Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Crispy12  
#1 Posted : 20 October 2010 22:37:33(UTC)
Rank: New forum user
Crispy12

Been reading this really useful forum for a while but never posted. However I've just seen this from DWP re cuts and thought it worth posting DWP statement • The Government remains committed to a health and safety regime that is fair, balanced and proportionate. Sensible health and safety at work helps to maintain a healthy and productive workforce and contributes to economic prosperity. • In the current economic climate, it is appropriate that HSE should be asked to reduce its costs in the same way as the rest of the public sector. In seeking to achieve savings of at least 35% over the SR10 period, we will share more of the cost with those businesses who create risks, while reducing burdens on low-risk businesses. • We will consider the recommendations of Lord YoungÂ’s review and design a streamlined health and safety system that is fit for the 21st century while remaining true to the core principles set out by Lord Robens in 1972. This looks like bad news.
firesafety101  
#2 Posted : 20 October 2010 22:41:57(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
firesafety101

While I don't know where the money raised from prosecutions actually ends up, surely if the HSE were allowed to be more visible at more workplaces they may manage more prosecutions to raise more for their budget? This would potentially end up with a healthier and safer workplace.
johnmurray  
#3 Posted : 21 October 2010 00:54:51(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
johnmurray

"we will share more of the cost with those businesses who create risks, while reducing burdens on low-risk businesses." Those who are more likely to have accidents will pay, while those who do not; will not. Reality break: Single-person companies and small employers, those who are more likely to have accidents (more of them) will not have the money to pay fines and costs.
peter gotch  
#4 Posted : 21 October 2010 13:11:23(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
peter gotch

Chris The fines go back to the Treasury. Roughly one third of HSE's overall budget is from charging for e.g. safety cases etc. The 35% cut will be from the other two thirds. Difficult to see how the intention to increase charging against those who create risks will be translated into a dividing line between risk creators and low-risk businesses. P
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.