Rank: Forum user
|
I have been asked to complete assessments, prior to the involvement of Occupational Health, to determine whether some Field Service Engineers still require automatic, in preference to, manual cars. Does anyone have a (work equipment) assessment format or criteria I could utilise
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Err..........they may only hold a licence for automatics?
In other respects, I'm curious Sharon. What sort of assessment is expected, and why?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
In my personal view 'automatics' allow you to concentrate on the road better than manuals and therefore reduces stress and the possibility of a crash - any body know of any research?
where a person has not driven a 'manual' for a long period there will be a period of adjustment which will bring with it a period of higher risk and thereafter, in my personal opinion, the risk will remain higher than for 'automatics'
However all my above comments do not matter as its probably a *cost cutting exercise and nothing else [* Cost in the vaguest sense; as its proved that auto gearboxes usually last much longer than manual boxes so are probably cheaper in the long run -However accounts do not usually address long term areas]
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Other than the obvious licence issue, you may find some staff just like automatic cars. Now that then is up to your company to decide if they want to pay the extra cost involved in the lease/purchase and running cost of these vehicles.
But if the driver is disadvantaged by having a manual over an automatic car due to a physical disability then you are on very sticky ground.
I am surprised your H.R department is not involved in this; as the D.D.A. will come into play and a decision as to the involve O.H. or the persons G.P. will require a written consent form for any information to be disclosed to your company. I know as I have been down this route with the company I currently work for.
I would defiantly talk to your company H.R. department and legal team before you get too far into this project.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
Thank you all for your responses. I have already considered the license issue, DDA and HR made the initial request before OH is involved - simply wanted info if anyone else had been down the same path
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
DDA now superseded by the Equalities Act.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
As a side note, Automatic Gearboxes are becoming more and more prevelant in the HGV world; indeed most of the big contracts and chains (think supermarkets) already have the majority of their trucks fitted with automatic gearboxes.
Better fuel economy, less wear on the drivetrain and consistent performance are the main drivers, although the more relaxed and less tiring (particularly in heavy traffic) benefits also help reduce driver fatigue and stress. Automatics can also contribute to a reduction in aggressive driver behaviour, although research in this area is in its infancy. I'm sure your OH will be aware of these areas.
It may be useful to consider the whole picture rather than just the up front costs of auto vs manual.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
A question to wizzpete and others: I have long thought that whilst the published fuel consumption for autos is higher than for the manual version, day to day use of the auto-box car is more likely to promote a smoother relaxed driving style, resulting in a more fuel-efficient drive, probably translating in to spending less at the pumps.
Does anybody have any hard evidence to support that view?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Only ever driven one automatic, and that was a Prius (yes the brakes did work). Terrific car, very very easy to drive, and of course quite ridiculous fuel economy,
John
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
I've been out the haulage (sorry, logistsics) industry for a few years now, so can't place anything defiinate. What the big chains figured is that whilst, in isolation, a manual gearbox truck was better in terms of mpg than an auto (a fact backed up my manufacturers' own figures) when you factor in inexperienced or different driver 'types' fuel economy figures varied greatly.
Introducing Automatic gearboxes levelled the playing the field, meaning that whilst a good driver of a manual would out perform an auto-truck every time, the worst driver in an auto would out perform even an average manual driver. With a heavy reliance on Agency Drivers, this gave them a better overall fuel return and as this was the second biggest running cost (behind wages) it did offer savings over the long term.
I do rememeber reviewing internal fuel performance figures which backed this up but clearly can't access them anymore. The Road Haulage Asscociation may be able to point people in the right direction.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
The resale value of 2nd hand automatics is pretty poor though isn't it?
There's also that fun experience of automatic vehicle 'creep' if you don't apply the brake - particularly exciting at bust T-junctions!
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.