Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
firesafety101  
#1 Posted : 10 January 2011 18:13:07(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
firesafety101

Just a question perhaps for the experts. I know a very small dose of amps can be fatal but what are the different scenarios for fatal shocks? I'm thinking 110 V tools on construction sites.
Canopener  
#2 Posted : 10 January 2011 18:33:51(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Canopener

Perhaps one for Paul Skymes. My understanding of the 110v system is that the transformer is centre tapped to earth, so that theoretically, any shock should be limited to 55v, or thereabouts. I am sure Paul or someone else with more experience of 'wiggly amps' will be able to explain better.
RayRapp  
#3 Posted : 10 January 2011 19:46:32(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
RayRapp

I believe there is a correlation between the amperage and the voltage, however .5 of an amp or 50v can kill a person given the right (wrong) conditions. Impedance is the collective name for resistance and electric shock. That is about my sum knowledge on the subject!
paul.skyrme  
#4 Posted : 10 January 2011 21:30:19(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
paul.skyrme

Phil, Thank you for the vote of confidence! However, it is Skyrme, NOT Skymes! ;) Chris it is "volts that jolts" but "amps that kills". I have had many electric shocks over the years in the 10's of thousands of volts. If anyone "played with a Van De Graff generator at school, college or uni that could generate such voltages, however the current is minuscule. "static" shocks from the ignition systems of cars etc are also often thousands of volts but nano, micro or milli amps. Beware of the old magneto ignitions though they had some current behind the spark! My explanations may not be rigorously technically correct, however, I hope that I have "modified" them to explain the situation in a better manner. Ok as far as construction site supplies, Phil is correct the "normal" 110V a.c. on a "site" as supplied from a "yellow" transformer type supply is what is know in the trade as CTE, that is centre tapped earth. In this scenario you only achieve circa 55V to true earth potential, RMS that is. Below 50V a.c. is considered "harmless", think of it, if you put your hands across your car battery which is capable of delivering several hundred amps in seconds to drive the starter motor, however only at 12V d.c. you probably felt nothing, I know I did every time I did it! The joys of youth eh! OK, Ray is also correct that in the wrong situation a current at 50V a.c. can kill, certainly 0.5A can kill, a.c. or d.c. depending on how it is applied to the body. The reason we look at 30mA as additional protection against electric shock in general electrical installations is that "most" humans can withstand this level of current for half a 50Hz a.c. cycle IIRC. Thus it is a survivable shock, trust me it is! Please don't ask any more! If you are serious about getting "into" this you need to refer to IEC TR 60479 which is an IEC (International ElectroTechnical Committee) report on the physiological affects of electric shocks of varying currents and voltages on humans and animals. BTW 4 legged beasts are more susceptible as they have 4 points of contact and can have a larger voltage differential between their points of contact. Impedance is not the collective name for resistance and electric shock it is the collective name for the "resistance" to an a.c. electric current caused by resistive, capacitive, and inductive affects to the flow of said current. Chris, you DO have my mobile no. if you need it, already, else PM & I'll give it to you again as this may be a little difficult to explain on here, though I am willing to try, thus keep this discussion in the general body of info! Not sure at this stage what else to post? The risk of a shock from correctly maintained power tools even on a construction site is quite small really IMHO. Remember 240V a.c. supplies on construction sites should be protected by a 30mA RCD. These will then be supplying the 100V a.c. CTE step down transformers. Thus the energy at the 110V side will be limited to the 30mA incoming earth leakage current at 55V to earth, "not rigorous I know" also as the equipment is already in good condition the operator should not come into contact with the electrical supply should they?
Canopener  
#5 Posted : 10 January 2011 21:48:35(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Canopener

Sorry Paul, very much from memory! And to answer Chris's question "What piece of electricity actually kills?" Isn't it the bit that comes out of the end of the red or brown wire? KIDDING
Darach  
#6 Posted : 10 January 2011 21:49:37(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Darach

Hi Paul, Very informative post, cheers. Can you shed any light what the maximum length of extension lead (110v from source to power tool) should be?.....If any. thanks Darach.
paul.skyrme  
#7 Posted : 10 January 2011 21:55:13(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
paul.skyrme

Darach, This will depend on MANY factors mate sorry! Gis a bit more info & we can get to the bottom of it. Which limit are you thinking of, what size lead? See, not making fun of you but these are just 2 of the Q's! Paul
paul.skyrme  
#8 Posted : 10 January 2011 21:57:55(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
paul.skyrme

Phil, It could be, or it could also be the bit out of the Black, Grey Yellow, Blue or White bit! That depends on which phase and which version of the regs it was wired to. Also IF it is a machine it could be orange, violet,... I can't go on any more! Loosing the will to live! ;)
johnmurray  
#9 Posted : 11 January 2011 07:23:30(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
johnmurray

Far too simplistic. Whether the electricity kills depends on many more factors than the voltage. The points of contact that the electricity flows through for instance. Arm-to-arm flow is the most dangerous because the heart is in the middle. The impedance offered to the flow by the body as well......and if the body points-of-contact are wet is also a factor because that affects the resistance/impedance to the flow. Car ignition was mentioned.......modern car ignition systems are fully capable of killing a person, as are the xenon headlamp power supplies. Holding the plug cap to see if it sparks is highly likely to enable you never seeing anything again. Standing on a wet road, trying to find an ignition fault in a thunderstorm by light provided by a 12 to 230 volt inverter may well give you a bad day. This is what risk assessments are for.
paul.skyrme  
#10 Posted : 11 January 2011 07:47:46(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
paul.skyrme

John, I did say it was not rigorously correct, I also did say that it depends on how the shock is applied to the body. As far as the Xenon headlamp drivers go yep, I'd not want to get in the way of one of those! I must also say that the last time I had an ignition shock was from an old Bosch Motronic engine management system, it still had a single coil and a ht distributor, things have move on since then and the new coil per plug or 2 systems I have not worked on, if I understand things correctly we are still in the 10’s of kV range around the 50 to 60kV mark? Though I’m not sure what the current is. Motronic systems used to be around 30kV IIRC. However, the current does need a return path, so unless you are "touching" the return path also then the current would need to flow through the vehicle tyres, not much chance of that really? Same as birds sitting on a 400kV overhead line they get no shock unless they contact an earthed part or another live line at a different potential, it does happen, especially with 2 birds during the mating season! Mind at 400kV and with the current flowing it can jump considerable gaps! Don't quite get why you should be at more risk from a 230V inverter as you have no earth path from the live supply side of the 230 back to the true general mass of earth, unless you become that also, as the inverter earth would not be connected back to the general mass of earth as a mains installation would be. This type of isolation is the one of the principles behind safety supplies, earth free zones etc. often used for testing and repair environments.
teh_boy  
#11 Posted : 11 January 2011 08:36:04(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
teh_boy

JohnMurray wrote:
Far too simplistic. This is what risk assessments are for.
John I felt that was an odd reply to an informative post. Surly you need the information provided by Paul to carry out a suitable and sufficient risk assessment IMHO. No maths = No answers. Chris - Have you got the NEBOSH cert 'blue book' lying around? Mine = issue 3 and on page 145 explains some of the principles (ish) Hope that helps... I think the diploma books have more info but they are safely locked up at home :)
Jane Blunt  
#12 Posted : 11 January 2011 08:57:23(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Jane Blunt

While the original scenario was of a low voltage (centre tapped 110V), it also asked the question what are the different scenarios for fatal shocks. Here are some: If continued for a long time, a current in excess of the 'let-go' current can produce collapse, unconsciousness and death. Currents flowing through the chest, head or the centres controlling respiration can cause it to cease. When the current is interrupted, respiration may not start spontaneously within the timeframe required for life to continue (to artificial respiration here is crucial) Ventricular fibrillation is caused by moderately small cuurents of moderate voltage which over-stimulate the heart. If this is not halted, death can follow in a few minutes. Heart standstill can be caused by relatively high currents at moderate to high voltages. Relatively high currents can cause fatal damage to the central nervous system. Relatively high currents can cause burns to internal organs. If high enough to raise the temperature of the body death is instant. Electricity kills!
tabs  
#13 Posted : 11 January 2011 12:38:08(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
tabs

paul.skyrme wrote:
Phil, It could be, or it could also be the bit out of the Black, Grey Yellow, Blue or White bit! That depends on which phase and which version of the regs it was wired to. Also IF it is a machine it could be orange, violet,... I can't go on any more! Loosing the will to live! ;)
I am least confident with the physics of electricity than almost any other aspect of science - so I might be wrong, but does anything actually "come out" of wires? I thought it was a swap of charge or potential rather than a physical flow of matter. Sorry for the deviation from original post, but I saw it as a chance to better my understanding whilst we had some knowledgable folk looking on.
Jane Blunt  
#14 Posted : 11 January 2011 12:51:10(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Jane Blunt

tabs wrote:
.... but does anything actually "come out" of wires? I thought it was a swap of charge or potential rather than a physical flow of matter.
The answer to this is yes, and no - it comes out and it goes back. Electrons do wander around the electric circuit (not particularly fast, actually). They don't escape from the wires. Have a look here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drift_velocity
firesafety101  
#15 Posted : 11 January 2011 14:48:56(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
firesafety101

Wow wow wow, how clever am I in getting such an informative thread on here. I'm really happy I started this one. Thanks to all for the replies, now without getting into the "PAT testing isn't a requirement" argument can someone tell me what is the potential for serious harm to an individual resulting from using a portable tool that is in "not so good condition"? If you consider the supply is as above, a transformer supplied from the mains but the portable equipment does not get tested according to HSE recommendations. I know it's another guesswork scenario but it is something I need right now. PS Paul thanks for the most descriptive answer, you lost me again but it is good to know there are knowledgeable people looking in, that goes for you all by the way.
Jane Blunt  
#16 Posted : 11 January 2011 14:57:28(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Jane Blunt

Whether or not the shock is fatal is not the only consideration. The shock causes involuntary movements (don't forget that our muscles are activated by electrical impulses), and this can cause fatal accidents as well. I know someone who fell off a ladder as a result of an electric shock.
firesafety101  
#17 Posted : 11 January 2011 15:02:36(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
firesafety101

Jane, that's what I would like to know - what was that someone using at the time they got the shock on the ladder? Was it defective portable equipment? If so was it tested and was it in date as per HSE recommendations?
Paul Duell  
#18 Posted : 11 January 2011 15:06:48(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Paul Duell

You beat me to it, Jane, I was about to make exactly that point! Something else to consider with 110v equipment is that it's best to have the transformer (yellow box) as close as possible to the source of 240v, then make the "long run" with 110v. Better still, of course, is to avoid too long a run altogether. A friend of mine tells the story of someone who couldn't find a socket to plug in his 110v "Henry" style vacuum cleaner. So he cut the yellow plug off, fitted a blue one and plugged it in to 240. Apparently it worked very well, for a very short time...
Jane Blunt  
#19 Posted : 11 January 2011 15:07:47(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Jane Blunt

They touched a live conductor in a faulty piece of fixed electrical equipment. However, this is not relevant - touching a live conductor will have a similar effect regardless of whether it is from portable or fixed equipment. 110V equipment often has a hard life. I would like to see people inspect and test it regularly as per the HSE recommendations myself.
firesafety101  
#20 Posted : 11 January 2011 15:55:06(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
firesafety101

Jane your final sentence is the crux of the matter. There is a batch of Principal Contractors that are reluctant to follow the HSE advice, they want to test annually instead, and use cost as the reason. The Client is agreeing with them because he does not want the cost passed on to him. Your wording "would like to see" is the problem. we cannot instruct them as it is only guidance. Almost every time I see an item tested annually and near the end of that year, there is a defect or some damage with the equipment.
firesafety101  
#21 Posted : 11 January 2011 15:57:34(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
firesafety101

What would be the likely outcome if there was a lighting festoon with one or more broken or missing "lamps" and someone came into contact with the socket. If it was live? Same socket on the floor and a water spill in contact with the socket?
Users browsing this topic
Guest (4)
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.