Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Paul H11  
#1 Posted : 11 January 2011 10:54:18(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Paul H11

Am I the only person that has noticed that if an ambulance is called to the workplace then they are invariably accompanied by the police? In one recent example the police arrived and immediately contacted the Health and Safety Enforcement Agency (in this case the local authority), although the accident was not reportable. This has led to an enthusiastic investigation by the enforcement agency regardless of the minor injury and the fact that this was not a reportable incident. If this is happening on a routine basis then the Police are effectively side stepping RIDDOR and introducing a new category of reportable accident, that is if an ambulance is called then the authorities are informed immediately. My understanding is that the Police have no jurisdiction over workplace accidents and are not required to attend. I'm of the belief that we should object to this development if indeed it is widespread as I suspect. Am I alone in this experience?
boblewis  
#2 Posted : 11 January 2011 11:10:34(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
boblewis

Paul You are encountering here the protocol for Police- Enforcement Officer liaison. Police treat all knowledge of accidents at work as potential crimes until they know otherwise. They then decide to either pass it completely to enforcement or ask the enforcement authorities to assist them in their investigation dependent on whether they have a specific criminal interest. Either way they may ask for advice from the enforcement authority. The "size" of the accident is not a concern of the police only the circumstances and involvement of other persons. Bob
Andrew W Walker  
#3 Posted : 11 January 2011 11:11:09(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Andrew W Walker

At my last employer we had a police visit when both the ambulance and fire services were called, both for different incidents. The incident where the ambulance was involved wasn't even an accident; an employee was taken ill with a pre existing condition. The HSE were not contacted by the police on any occasion. We also had an occasion where the local hospital called the fire service to report a chemical spillage at our site. An employee had damaged a consignment of acetone and had somehow got this on his lips. He was sent to hospital as a precaution, where he was stripped, washed and had his clothes incinerated. The receptacle was 1 litre and the affected area was cleaned and washed. Everything was then put into a hazchem waste container. The FS closed the estate, had three tenders there and decided, after an hour, that they were not needed.
Jane Blunt  
#4 Posted : 11 January 2011 11:13:14(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Jane Blunt

I have experienced this in an accident that took place in the late 1990s. Where an ambulance is called to what appears to be a serious injury it is not a surprise that the Police arrive on the scene. On that occasion they interviewed (not PACE so far as I know) a Director. If a death occurs there is a written protocol, see http://www.hse.gov.uk/en...deaths/investigation.htm
bob youel  
#5 Posted : 11 January 2011 12:53:10(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
bob youel

Excellent postings to date; and it shows that various government departments are working together - The police arriving on site will turn a directors head more than anything else The more 'pips on the shoulder' that are present indicates the importance the police have given the incident and yes the word 'crime' does apply noting that most directors etc do not give H&S crimes a second thought unless the police are present! Good practice I think
Andrew W Walker  
#6 Posted : 11 January 2011 13:08:53(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Andrew W Walker

bob youel wrote:
Excellent postings to date; and it shows that various government departments are working together - The police arriving on site will turn a directors head more than anything else The more 'pips on the shoulder' that are present indicates the importance the police have given the incident and yes the word 'crime' does apply noting that most directors etc do not give H&S crimes a second thought unless the police are present! Good practice I think
When we did the incident reports and quoted the police reference number it did raise a lot of questions from further up the food chain- always a good thing in my opinion. It did focus their mind on prevention.
Bob Shillabeer  
#7 Posted : 11 January 2011 13:35:24(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Bob Shillabeer

I see no problem with this situation as the 999 call is monitored by the police as a routine issue. They attend and can quite quickly identify if there has been any criminal action that caused or contributed to the incident. If there is no evidence to suggest that a crime may have been committed they will withdraw often after speaking to a senior person of the company mainly to confirm thier view. As to contacting the local enforcement authority (whoever they may be) is seen as a routine matter. The fact it makes sure that senior management are made aware of the occurrence and take its investigation more seriously can only be a good thing.
RayRapp  
#8 Posted : 11 January 2011 13:36:25(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
RayRapp

Mmmm, not sure about this one. The police and/or HSE response should, surely, be proportionate to the incident? Anyway Bob, I thought the Police/HSE protocol was for work-related fatalities and not for all manner of accidents.
Jane Blunt  
#9 Posted : 11 January 2011 13:41:59(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Jane Blunt

Ray, since they appear to be monitoring 999 calls, they probably make an initial judgement on that. In our case the injury was severe. The Police do not have to confine their interests to fatalities.
Thundercliffe26308  
#10 Posted : 11 January 2011 13:47:20(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Thundercliffe26308

..i was lead to believe if an ambulance or fire engine is sent to a situation the police attended anyway?
David Bannister  
#11 Posted : 11 January 2011 13:49:40(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
David Bannister

Very many years ago I provided first aid to a member of the public and then went home once the ambulance personnel had taken charge. I was woken up in the middle of the night to be informally interviewed by the police. They told me then that they always respond to 999 calls unless they are sure that there is no possibility of a crime. I don't know whether this still holds true. Sadly it was a fatal heart attack as I later read in a local paper.
Zyggy  
#12 Posted : 11 January 2011 13:58:21(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Zyggy

To my knowledge, the current agreement with the HSE is only under the work-related deaths protocol, & does not cover all workplace accidents where an ambulance is summoned. However, there may be local arrangements where this happens as it may be that a non-H&S related crime could have been committed, & only the police have powers of arrest. In my experience, even with fatalities, the police are very quick & more than happy to pass the case over to the HSE!
Canopener  
#13 Posted : 11 January 2011 13:58:25(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Canopener

I have very recent experience of this in connection with an accident on the public highway. Ambulance called. Police attended scene before arrival of ambulance. HSE informed (by the Police?). I have no problem with this, all parties were professional, proportionate, and my overall impression of how we all worked together was very positive.
fsp  
#14 Posted : 11 January 2011 14:23:20(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
fsp

We had an accident about 18 months ago (reported under RIDDOR) where an employee ran into the front of a car just as it started to move - head down as it was raining hard - and his momentum caused him to twist round on 1 foot, breaking his ankle. Ambulance only called and about an hour later Police arrived. The accident was on our site (i.e. private property) so they had no interest but apparently are informed by the Ambulance service of anything like an RTA. Also, the HSE inspector who called (unannounced) about 2 weeks said that a "struck by" of this nature is something they always investigate. Also, some time ago now, a fitter was applying a special sealant sourced from the USA (no solvent, non-toxic & non-hazardous according to its msds) using a standard sealant gun outdoors in warm weather when he felt unwell and fainted - Ambulance was called as a precaution. The Fire Brigade arrived about 10 mins later, 2 tenders, chemical unit etc and immediately set about their chemical decontamination procedures - the message they received was "persons overcome by chemical fumes" - again coming through ambulance sources. No, I definitely am not criticising the Ambulance service in any way and agree that it is an excellent thing that they talk to each other, but perhaps demonstrates the need to be very clear and factually accurate when talking to emergency services?
Citizen Smith  
#15 Posted : 11 January 2011 15:19:05(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Citizen Smith

excellent points made above so I won't repeat those but just one point to clarify. The Police don't monitor the 999 system in the way that has been suggested. However if you dial 999 and ask for Fire or Ambulance the relevant controller will make decision as to whether other emergency services need to be involved. For instance if you call to report an Road Traffic Collision (RTC) and ask for an ambulance the police will always be asked to respond as well. If there appears to be a serious injury incident than again police will often be asked by Ambo to respond. With the new Airwaves comms system all three services (and others when required) can actually talk to each other without having to go through the different control rooms so communication between services, whilst far from perfect is now much better. Personally, I don't see the problem with plod arriving at the site provided the response from then on is reasonable and as has been said above it concentrates the minds of those further up the food chain.
boblewis  
#16 Posted : 11 January 2011 19:02:07(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
boblewis

I have had the HSE turn up to many non fatalities - They make a judgement call on attending but by no means do they attend fatalities alone. Bob
Steve Scotter  
#17 Posted : 11 January 2011 19:20:13(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Steve Scotter

Having worked as an Emergency Ambulanceman for over twelve years I can say, I have found Police were called to attend any RTA (Road Traffic Accident) or industrial accident by the ambulance control. The Police did not monitor the ambulance control (well during my service to the best of my knowledge). As for the three Emergency services communicating together, well .......................................
Phillips20760  
#18 Posted : 12 January 2011 09:54:13(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Phillips20760

Steve, Through similar experience I agree that communication between the Emergency Services could be improved to say the least! Nevertheless, it is now protocol for Ambulance Control to notify the police of ALL workplace accidents regardless of the severity. (as such the police do not monitor AC calls) If you think about it should we be ringing an ambulance for minor & non-reportable injuries anyway? Knowing the pressure our brilliant emergency services are under I would argue that recipients of most minor injuries could be transported by other means.... Regards, Ian
Paul H11  
#19 Posted : 12 January 2011 14:59:04(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Paul H11

Some great points raised however.....I'm alarmed at the number of people who meekly accept this extension of Police involvement, it's none of their business. The HSE have more Criminal investigation Powers in the Workplace than the Police and I would humbly add that your average PC is totally unable to identify a Crime under Health, Safety or Environmental Law. If here has been an act of violence or a crime associated with the event then we would ask for the police as well. By the way I believe it is mandatory that the Police are informed of road traffic accidents involving injury, road traffic accidents happen on Public Roads not Private Property. The responsibility for reporting is on the Employer or Occupier not the Police, Ambulance, etc There seems to be a busy body element to the whole thing. What makes anyone think that a Call Centre Operative has more intimate knowledge of a Chemical Spill Situation than the Site Management, if we need a Chemical Spill Response we will call for one or face the rather sever consequences. I would prefer that the Police focussed on tackling crimes that are under their jurisdiction rather than interfering in things that are not their concern. After all we keep hearing that budget cuts will result in fewer Police on the street, perhaps this is an area that they can reduce numbers without affecting their Front Line duties! When the Police become seen as agents of the State they will lose the goodwill of the people. Sorry if my view appear controversial!
Jane Blunt  
#20 Posted : 12 January 2011 15:13:57(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Jane Blunt

Paul - look at it another way. When an ambulance is called it is for an injured person. The Police have an interest in injuries, because they can result from many causes, which include assault and workplace accidents. In order to find out whether it is within their jurisdiction (assault) or not (workplace accident) they need to attend.
Ken Slack  
#21 Posted : 12 January 2011 15:18:54(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Ken Slack

Hi Paul, Not to sound codescending but you are well off the mark, the police have as much (or more) 'business' as other agencies. Very often the police service will prosecute under the HASAW act in liaison with the HSE. HASAW Crimes are exactly that, crimes and quite often serious ones at that. If you haven't got anything to hide then an inspector should be welcome.
wizzpete  
#22 Posted : 12 January 2011 15:40:51(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
wizzpete

Paul H11 wrote:
What makes anyone think that a Call Centre Operative has more intimate knowledge of a Chemical Spill Situation than the Site Management, if we need a Chemical Spill Response we will call for one or face the rather sever consequences.
They don't have that knowledge, granted, but what makes you so sure all Employers are responsible enough to request a Chemical Spill Response? I know it was a long time ago, but Allied Colloids in 1992? 50 minutes before they notified the Fire Brigade of their Chemical 'Incident'. As we can't assume all Employers will carry out their responsibilities for any number of reasons ranging from a deliberate attempt at a cover up to sheer ignorance or incompetence, that descision is not theirs to make. Facing the 'rather severe consequences' is a bit 'after the horse has bolted' and no consolation to anyone injured or killed due to a delay while the Employer dithered about what to do
Canopener  
#23 Posted : 12 January 2011 21:00:01(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Canopener

Yes, I have to say that I am rather surprised at the response at #19, and am not sure if I think it is controversial; perhaps odd. I wonder if you had a particularly bad experience? I suppose it depends on the circumstances, and I can only speak from my recent experience, I was grateful to have both the Police and the HSE there. Of interest is that 'crimes' are committed on private property, and that many road traffic offences can be committed on what most people consider to be private property and roads.
firestar967  
#24 Posted : 12 January 2011 21:40:05(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
firestar967

Interesting thread, a firefighter in charge of a crew, on a callout will have to decide what other services may be required at the incident. This is a judgement call, as if the incident reported sounded serious then having that backup in place quicker, is desirable. However, my experience on this was on attending a multiple car pile-up, as reported by a member of the public and calling for police and ambulance to be in attendance, to find out on arrival a two car shunt! I would say that the other emergency services employ the same tactics and it is really a judgement call. Sometimes it'll be right but most of the time?
djupnorth  
#25 Posted : 13 January 2011 09:22:06(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
djupnorth

Paul, You are not the only person. As a couple of people have already stated it has been policy for a few years now that when you dial 999 and ask for an ambulance to attend a serious incident at what appears to be a workplace, the Emergency Operator will alert the police. While there is no formal policy on co-operating on non-fatal incidents, there are agreements between the police and HSE that in any situation where a apparently serious incident has occurred that might lead to a fatality, the police will notify the HSE. However, watch this space as the 35% cutbacks that the HSE has to implement may well result in it not becoming immediately involved in some incidents (particularly those involving possible s.3 HSWA breaches) as opposed to s.2 HSWA breaches. I hope this helps. Regards. DJ
Jim Tassell  
#26 Posted : 13 January 2011 10:59:13(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Jim Tassell

As various posters have noted, it seems common practice for police to turn up along with ambulances. 'Twas ever thus, well since the 1970s. Practices vary around the country I suspect. It's understandable that they turn out because initial information may be extremely sketchy even in these high tech days. The police need to be satisfied that such offences as may have been committed fall to HSE/LA enforcement before they withdraw; they need to exclude other sorts of violent crime. I'm a bit surprised that no one has mentioned preservation of the crime scene and continuity of evidence. Once at site the police need to be mindful of these points, which is why they can sometimes seem to hang around being rather obstructive pending the arrival of HSE/LA inspectors when they thankfully depart. In the 1980s, before HSE got it's out of hours act together, I know my home number was on the noticeboard in Govan police office so they could pass responsibility on as soon as they could! Joking apart, continuity of evidence is a substantial issue that your average copper is well versed in.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.