Hi all, I wondered if I could gauge opinion on the above in relation to fire risk assessments of communal areas. I am working on behalf a client who manages several hundred social housing communal areas, but they are unaware of the flame retardant standard of any of the paints which have been used to decorate communal areas (most of which have been in place for several years). They are aware that the escape routes etc should be class 0 under the current building regs, and have a process to achieve this standard when redecoration works are carried out. However, it this their view that it is not reasonably practicable to retrospectively test the existing paint in the communal areas throughout the housing stock. They will instead consider alternative risk reduction measures to prevent fires starting and spreading within the common areas. Do you think that this sounds like a reasonable approach, given the volume of housing stock involved? Any opinions/feedback would be appreciated. James

James, my view is that the prevention of ignition, complete absence of readily combustible materials in common areas, clear and protected exits with adequate warning is a reasonable approach. They are aware of the need to comply when the next redecorating is done. This is the stance I have taken with my similar clients. Local site management is crucial in maintaining the "combustible and obstruction free" common areas. I fully agree that retrospective testing in not reasonable in the circumstances you describe.