Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
kazhod  
#1 Posted : 10 February 2011 16:16:08(UTC)
Rank: New forum user
kazhod

Hi, I'm doing a COSHH Assessment for a dental practice, what is the most up to date regulations that I should following when doing the assessments? Thanks
Kate  
#2 Posted : 10 February 2011 16:23:47(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Kate

Kesh  
#3 Posted : 10 February 2011 16:25:04(UTC)
Rank: New forum user
Kesh

The most up to date regulation is the Control of Substance Hazard to health Regulations 2002, and associated ACoP L5. Also depending on material or process the risk assessment will also be covered in if there are any regulations governing this for example Risk assessment (COSHH) is covered in Control of Lead regulations.
HSSnail  
#4 Posted : 10 February 2011 16:25:09(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
HSSnail

Kazhod With the greatest of respect if you don't know the regulations are you sure you are competent to do this work? If you decide you are then it's The Control of Substances Hazardous to Health Regulations 2002(as amended) Sometimes you will see these wrongly described as COSHH 2004 as that was when the amendment's were made. Brian
Kate  
#5 Posted : 10 February 2011 16:39:57(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Kate

I don't see what's wrong with asking what the current regs are with the intention of following them - sounds sensible to me.
Barrie(Badger)Etter  
#6 Posted : 10 February 2011 16:53:17(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Barrie(Badger)Etter

quote=brian hagyard]Kazhod With the greatest of respect if you don't know the regulations are you sure you are competent to do this work? Brian
One of the prime directives we are taught when setting out on the path of safety (My wife's a Trekkie and yes I've been brainwashed) is when you don't know / not sure is to ask and if its' outside our field of knowledge to say so. So Kaz has asked = following protocol, what has not been indicated is the knowledge side. Until we know this we should not criticise. Badger
kazhod  
#7 Posted : 10 February 2011 17:15:07(UTC)
Rank: New forum user
kazhod

Thank you for your feed back, I did know the regulations but there has been alot of new guidance lately with regards to Dental Practices and I just wanted to be sure that what I thought was current - still was. Asking for confirmation was just my way of checking whether these changes had affected the regulations as there is always going to be people out there with more experience than me. Kaz
HSSnail  
#8 Posted : 11 February 2011 08:19:09(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
HSSnail

To those posters who have questioned my comment. Which is why I said "with respect" as I had no Knowledge of Kazhos' expertise you will also note that I supplied the information requested. I personally feel that COSHH is one of the hardest pieces of legislation for a general practitioner to follow. We frequently see reports of issues with Hazard Data sheets and the fact the many are inaccurate and are actually designed for Chip and not COSHH. I would direct anyone to the excellent post by such people as Chris Packam on this forum about the dangers of not actually understanding COSHH. I frequently ask for guidance and I have no issue with that, but Kazhod in your reply you state there has been a lot of new guidance with regards to Dental Practices, I would offer no advice on dental practices as I have never dealt with them. But your original question was "I'm doing a COSHH Assessment for a dental practice, what is the most up to date regulations that I should following when doing the assessments", not about guidance on applying this in a dental practice. For me I just find it a concern that people don't even know the basic regulations when undertaking work. Brian
Kate  
#9 Posted : 11 February 2011 08:48:56(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Kate

Not knowing the regs before undertaking the work would indeed be a problem - hence, presumably, the wish to get the current regs, so eliminating that problem.
chris.packham  
#10 Posted : 11 February 2011 10:24:44(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
chris.packham

Take a look at the following for a start: http://www.hse.gov.uk/skin/faq/dental.htm http://www.hse.gov.uk/sk...ploy/highrisk/dental.htm However, don't necessarily follow the HSE approach on latex as this is now out of date. There is nothing wrong with single use latex gloves providing they are low free protein and unpowdered. Chris
bob youel  
#11 Posted : 11 February 2011 10:29:39(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
bob youel

Don't forget to evaluate the replacement regs for CHIP and some REACH areas; as some signage and terminology has changed and is to change I feel that all the comments made herein are valid especially about competence as for too long none H&S people have been picking brains without realising the consequences / nor caring in some circumstances
ptaylor14  
#12 Posted : 11 February 2011 11:36:28(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
ptaylor14

cant a man ask a simple question anymore?
HSSnail  
#13 Posted : 11 February 2011 11:51:06(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
HSSnail

Quote=kazhod]Hi, I'm doing a COSHH Assessment for a dental practice, what is the most up to date regulations that I should following when doing the assessments? Thanks
Now this may just have been a badly worded question, and I freely admit to doing that myself at times, but for me it could be read that someone had already agreed to do a COSHH Assessment but did not even know what the regulations were. This is a great site for advice I use it all the time, but for finding out what the current COSHH regulation are I can think of better ways. Or lets put it another way. I know about the existence of the Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 2007, I have even read Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 2007. (CDM) Approved Code of Practice, L144 and looked at the appropriate pages of the HSE web site. Does that make me competent to offer my services as The CDM co-ordinator? I have not even had to ask what the regulations were but as I have never worked on a building project in my life I would say NO! Brian
Guru  
#14 Posted : 11 February 2011 12:05:02(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Guru

Chris.Packham wrote:
However, don't necessarily follow the HSE approach on latex as this is now out of date. There is nothing wrong with single use latex gloves providing they are low free protein and unpowdered. Chris
Hi Chris, would you mind explain this for me please? I've always been under the impression that any latex gloves powdered or not should be avoided due to the potential of adverse skin reaction, particularly for those persons already sensitised? Thanks :)
chris.packham  
#15 Posted : 11 February 2011 12:30:44(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
chris.packham

Guru To explain in detail I would have to make an extremely long posting, so I suggest that if you PM me with your e-mail I will be happy to send you the information that shows quite clearly that the so-called latex allergy epidemic was limited to the powdered, high free protein single use natural rubber latex gloves and that unpowdered, low free protein single use glove represent no significant risk of latex allergy. As far as reusable natural rubber latex gloves, e.g. those that cleaners, dish-washers, etc. might wear, there has never been any significant risk of type I allergy to latex proteins. Chris
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.