Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
donnaf  
#1 Posted : 01 March 2011 23:29:13(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
donnaf

Good Evening All, I am doing a presentation on Thursday morning in relation to the importance of managing the supply chain and part of the presentation is in relation to legal consequences: "Under civil liability, clients are usually only liable for the negligent acts or omissions of their own employees. However they can also be held liable for the "torts“ of both their contractors and their contractor's employees such scenarios including: - Where a statute makes the occupier liable even though the contractor is at fault - Where the work is carried out near a public highway - Where the client is held to be liable for negligence of contractors engaged - Where an employee of the client is injured by contractor's negligence but overall control rests with client - Where the client ratifies the tort of the contractor - Where the client does not exercise reasonable care in selecting a competent contractor Do any "real life" examples or cases spring to mind with any fellow forum users that would fall into the above category or could point me in the direction of a website I could search? I always prefer to outline such information with an example that people can relate to - the audience is mixed industry. Thanks in advance, assistance always appreciated. Best Wishes - Donna
RayRapp  
#2 Posted : 02 March 2011 08:34:40(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
RayRapp

Donna Big question! I will start the ball rolling and hope others contribute. The seminal Court of Appeal case of Viasystems (Tyneside) Ltd v (1) Thermal Transfer (Northern) Limited and Ors [2005] springs to mind. Prior to this case only the employer could be held vicariously liable for the negligent act of an employee. However, the Viasystems case found that two 'employers' were both entitled to exercise control over the relevant act, so both were vicariously liable for the employee's negligence. The Court of Appeal also held that the measure of control was equal in this case and therefore both employers should contribute 50 per cent of the total award. Ray
RayRapp  
#3 Posted : 02 March 2011 08:35:57(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
RayRapp

SteveL  
#4 Posted : 02 March 2011 09:31:16(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
SteveL

donnaf Try these and the link at the bottom may help you. Where an employee of the client is injured by contractor's negligence but overall control rests with client Mersey Docks & Harbour Board v. Coggins & Griffiths (Liverpool) Ltd. [1947] Where the client ratifies the tort of the contractor R v British Steel Plc [1994] Where the client is held to be liable for negligence of contractors engaged Wilsons & Clyde Coal Co. Ltd v English [1937] Where the client does not exercise reasonable care in selecting a competent contractor R v Associated Octel Co Ltd (1996) http://www.safetyphoto.co.uk/subsite/index.htm
donnaf  
#5 Posted : 02 March 2011 13:38:26(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
donnaf

Thanks very much fellow forum users information much appreciated as always! Donna
russpc  
#6 Posted : 02 March 2011 14:59:30(UTC)
Rank: New forum user
russpc

Donna, Also have a look at McDermid v Nash Dredging Co 1987
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.