Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
John _Dobson  
#1 Posted : 30 June 2020 08:44:30(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
John _Dobson

Morning all

Can anybody help / advise

I am doing a COSHH RA for a substance 'V-San sanitiser', unclassified under chp and apparently harmless. This solution is the only solution used in a portable 'Fogging' machine that is used to disinfect vehicle cabs after suspected covid 19 contamination.

In doing the COSHH RA I asked the supplier about the effectiveness of the fogging process against coronavirus. They sent me a product specification document that contained another MSDS for a chemical called Bardac 22. The supplier advised that it is the Bardac 22 that effectively disinfects coronavirus

This raised further questions that I hope you can help me with;

Basically the suppliers are telling me that the substance Bardac 22 is part of the solution 'V-San' but that because the quantity of Bardac 22 is small there is no requirement to note its presence in the V San MSDS.

My questions are;

1. The substance Bardac 22 is classified as a corrosive and as being dangerous to the environment. Is it right that this product can be part of the solution V-San without it being detailed on the V San MSDS?

2. Is there a standard quantity (percentage) of a solution at which there is no need to detail on an MSDS?

3. If I do not know the quantity of Bardac 22 contained in the V San mixture how can I know if it is effective against coronavirus?

Thanks in advance for any help

Kate  
#2 Posted : 30 June 2020 08:50:22(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Kate

1. Yes, this is possible.

2. There are thresholds but I don't know off the top of my head what they are.  They would be defined in REACH, I think.

3. Search me.

thanks 1 user thanked Kate for this useful post.
John _Dobson on 01/07/2020(UTC)
A Kurdziel  
#3 Posted : 30 June 2020 09:17:26(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
A Kurdziel

Is this an actual SDS? https://oversiz.ru/f/bardac22piseng0203.pdf

 

Bardac22 is described as effective against enveloped virus and Covid 19 is an enveloped virus but strictly speaking they are ASSUMING that it is effective against Covid 19. For example the Defra approved list of disinfectants for use  in farming actually have to be tested against the specific pathogen- http://disinfectants.defra.gov.uk/DisinfectantsExternal/Default.aspx?Module=ApprovalsList_SI

Snice Covid 19 is new disease it might be acceptable to have evidence that it is effective against another coronavirus (there are at least dozen to choose from most of which are harmless to humans) but there is no evidence of that either.

Then there is of course the fact what you are buying is not Bardac22 but STURDY VSAN Sanitising Machine. There is as far as I can see only on UK supplier. The blurb seems to emphasise that is gets rid of odours as much as pathogens. I have no idea where it comes from and what its effectiveness actually is. The ad implies that it “our V-SAN's special agents attack and destroy all germs, bacteria, viruses and spores in its path. Replacing them with a long lasting freshness and leaving you with a much cleaner, safer environment.” Which sounds too good to be true. I’d expect data saying how effective is at what concentrations, in what conditions: Fogging systems re very temperature and humidity dependent.

You still need an SDS telling you what this V-SAN Vehicle Sanitising Solution actually is. If it is “harmless” , it would be the first disinfectant that I have ever come across that is totally harmless.

thanks 1 user thanked A Kurdziel for this useful post.
John _Dobson on 01/07/2020(UTC)
Roundtuit  
#4 Posted : 30 June 2020 09:37:56(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Roundtuit

AK - that is a product data sheet from the US manufacturer Lonza.

John - MSDS/chp are expired terms (June 2017). An SDS classified according to CLP has lower declaration thresholds for substances particularly active substances covered by the Biocidal Products Regulations due to the possibility of reaction at trace amounts. Under the old CHiP regulations many ignored substances less than 0.1%

Whilst the active substance named may appear on the BPR list supply and use within the EU should be for approved active substances sourced from EU based suppliers. The US has different regulations on chemical substances despite using (a version of) the Globally Harmonised System.

thanks 2 users thanked Roundtuit for this useful post.
John _Dobson on 01/07/2020(UTC), John _Dobson on 01/07/2020(UTC)
Roundtuit  
#5 Posted : 30 June 2020 09:37:56(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Roundtuit

AK - that is a product data sheet from the US manufacturer Lonza.

John - MSDS/chp are expired terms (June 2017). An SDS classified according to CLP has lower declaration thresholds for substances particularly active substances covered by the Biocidal Products Regulations due to the possibility of reaction at trace amounts. Under the old CHiP regulations many ignored substances less than 0.1%

Whilst the active substance named may appear on the BPR list supply and use within the EU should be for approved active substances sourced from EU based suppliers. The US has different regulations on chemical substances despite using (a version of) the Globally Harmonised System.

thanks 2 users thanked Roundtuit for this useful post.
John _Dobson on 01/07/2020(UTC), John _Dobson on 01/07/2020(UTC)
Roundtuit  
#6 Posted : 30 June 2020 09:45:20(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Roundtuit

Plus, at the same time our V-SAN's special agents attack and destroy all germs, bacteria, viruses and spores in its path.

Someone is making false claims to market and I suspect may be totallly ignorant of the supply chain regulations.

Ask them for the results of their testing e.g. BS EN 13697 for Covid

thanks 2 users thanked Roundtuit for this useful post.
John _Dobson on 01/07/2020(UTC), John _Dobson on 01/07/2020(UTC)
Roundtuit  
#7 Posted : 30 June 2020 09:45:20(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Roundtuit

Plus, at the same time our V-SAN's special agents attack and destroy all germs, bacteria, viruses and spores in its path.

Someone is making false claims to market and I suspect may be totallly ignorant of the supply chain regulations.

Ask them for the results of their testing e.g. BS EN 13697 for Covid

thanks 2 users thanked Roundtuit for this useful post.
John _Dobson on 01/07/2020(UTC), John _Dobson on 01/07/2020(UTC)
peter gotch  
#8 Posted : 30 June 2020 11:34:43(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
peter gotch

I would thank Roundtuit's 2 or 4 postings, but that would multiply the number of thanks!!

Other discussions here about the dubious effectiveness of fogging systems re Covid-19 worth reading.

thanks 1 user thanked peter gotch for this useful post.
John _Dobson on 01/07/2020(UTC)
Users browsing this topic
Guest (3)
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.