IOSH forums home
»
Our public forums
»
OSH discussion forum
»
Employer's responsibility to 'supervise' employees
Rank: Forum user
|
Wonder if anyone can help out quickly? Specifically, which pieces of H&S legislation require 'supervision'? Thanks. P
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Just to clarify, all employees require supervision, so far as is reasonably practicable. This is regardless of all other legislation. If another piece of legislation does not mention "supervision", it is over-ridden by the HASAW etc. act 1974, as this is the highest piece of legislation in relation to health, safety and welfare at work. You must supervise your employees, where it is reasonably practicable to do so, or you are not meeting your legal obligations.. end of...
|
1 user thanked CptBeaky for this useful post.
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
also management regs.
Health and safety arrangements5.—(1) Every employer shall make and give effect to such arrangements as are appropriate, having regard to the nature of his activities and the size of his undertaking, for the effective planning, organisation, control, monitoring and review of the preventive and protective measures. (2) Where the employer employs five or more employees, he shall record the arrangements referred to in paragraph (1).
While it does not use the word supervise i wonder how you can do any of those things without surevision being part of it. The ACOP that went with them used to make it very clear - but unfortunatly it was witdrawn under the drive to stop "gold plateing" safety
|
1 user thanked HSSnail for this useful post.
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
Although I agree with and understand the "legal requirement" - these legal documents were based to some extent on the Factories Act and the old assumption that everyone works in factor, shop or office environment.
In todays' working environment, there are home-workers and others in a geographical diverse workplace, where there is no very little opportunity for a worker to be supervised.
Therefore the "so far as is reasonably practicable" aspect is important for organistions with these issues
|
1 user thanked Evans38004 for this useful post.
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
There was a case some years back when Westminster Council (I think) prosecuted a lift maintenance company after one of their engineers fell down a lift shaft. One of the things they did them for was a “lack of supervision” but it was never explained how an employer is meant to supervise peripatetic staff unless they assign a manager to follow them around, which is of course ridiculous.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
The degree I am studying had a similar situation given to me for one of the assignments (I won't go ino detail for fear of breaking the rules of that degree). I suggested that random spot checks would be a reasonably practicable control measure to ensure that employees were vigilant and did not slip into bad habits. I was marked high and told this would be a good compromise.
|
|
|
|
IOSH forums home
»
Our public forums
»
OSH discussion forum
»
Employer's responsibility to 'supervise' employees
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.