Rank: Forum user
|
Hoping someone can help and perhaps point me in the direction of authoratative references? Are there any 'standard' ranges of quoted Minimum Ignition Energy - at what point do you get concerned and at what point do you say 'no thank you?' to a substance whose SDS lists MIE under the physical parameters? I'll be honest this is not a topic I have dealt with before, so all help appreciated - and yes I know that if I am out of my depth I really need someone with the expertise to help me - just want to know what that expertise would be?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Don’t we look at flashpoints? You can’t really say that below a certain flashpoint or MIE you should avoid a particular substance. Its down to the risk assessment and how you apply the principles from DSEAR.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
There are no generic MIE control bands for the dusts or solvents/vapours presenting an explosion hazard. How to control depends upon the material in your process in your facility:
- engineering controls may negate dust or vapour cloud formation
- you may have DSEAR rated equipment - the quantity generated from use may be minimal Presenting an MIE value on a Safety Data Sheet is quite unusual, certainly not one of the specified headings under Section 9 of EU 2020/878 amending Annex II of REACH
|
2 users thanked Roundtuit for this useful post.
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
There are no generic MIE control bands for the dusts or solvents/vapours presenting an explosion hazard. How to control depends upon the material in your process in your facility:
- engineering controls may negate dust or vapour cloud formation
- you may have DSEAR rated equipment - the quantity generated from use may be minimal Presenting an MIE value on a Safety Data Sheet is quite unusual, certainly not one of the specified headings under Section 9 of EU 2020/878 amending Annex II of REACH
|
2 users thanked Roundtuit for this useful post.
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
That was what puzzled me - can't honestly say I've encountered this before and wonder why someone has gone to the trouble of measuring this and then quoting it on the SDS? I was thinking somebody MUST have felt this was important information for the substance in question, hence my query in the first place. I'm still wondering why someone did measure and then quote this information. I suppose I could always go back to the supplier and ask why its on the SDS
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
|
1 user thanked A Kurdziel for this useful post.
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
MIE is interesting to know, but not vital. Its very difficult to enesure any electrical energy is below MIE values, e.g. static electrical current. So in practice its of limited usefulness other than knowing how sensititve a substance is to ignition.
As others have said Flash Points are used for assessing DSEAR substances and hence determining hazardous area zone classifications - Zone 0/1/2.
|
1 user thanked Ian Bell2 for this useful post.
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
Further to my original post - The supplier's SDS was the document that raised my initial 'curiosity' as there was a good deal more information about handling the product and fire / explosion issues in the text of the SDS than I might have expected looking at the numerical data and H phrases etc listed. This caused us to pause and reconsider what we were going to do with the product in question, ans whether or not we had the appropriate facilities to handle it safely. What has since been discovered is that this SDS seems to be an 'outlier' - none of the other SDS from alternative suppliers examined so far mention as many hazards in use. So, should we a) go back to the original supplier and ask why they are more 'risk averse / cautious' than everybody else seems to be, or b) work from multiple SDSs and make our decision based on mutiple sources or c) stick with the suppliers SDS and not carry out the work as we don't have the full capabilities required according to our original supplier?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Personally I tend to check SDS information against the ECHA database using the search function at the top of the landing page https://echa.europa.eu/ Whilst it only contains information on substances (rather than mixtures) it does give a second opinion to the data being presented by your supplier especially where there is a registered substance fact sheet present. Trying to stack up various supplier SDS you are comparing the authoring software, how up to date the classification information is, how diligent the suppliers staff are and whether you have the correct market document.
|
4 users thanked Roundtuit for this useful post.
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Personally I tend to check SDS information against the ECHA database using the search function at the top of the landing page https://echa.europa.eu/ Whilst it only contains information on substances (rather than mixtures) it does give a second opinion to the data being presented by your supplier especially where there is a registered substance fact sheet present. Trying to stack up various supplier SDS you are comparing the authoring software, how up to date the classification information is, how diligent the suppliers staff are and whether you have the correct market document.
|
4 users thanked Roundtuit for this useful post.
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
Thanks Roundtuit, had a look and there doesn't seem to be much information on the ECHA website in relation to this substance - basically just a headline H phrase as far as I can see. Though to be honest I'm not familiar with using this website, so may have missed something
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Its not unknown for SDS to be in error. Another source to the ECHA database is a technical standard BS60079-20 Material characteristics. This standard does what is says it gives flamambility data for a whole variety of flammable substances.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
I may have missed this in the trial but what product are you looking for an MIE ?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
Stevedm, Apologies, but to avoid identifying the two companies involved - my curent employer and the manufacturer / supplier of the material - I'm not able to go into further details. We have 'resolved' the matter by taking into account all the other information we can publicly access on the material .. .. I know this isn't a perfect answer, but I'm not in a perfect world Thanks to all for comments and advice. P
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.