Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
clane  
#1 Posted : 25 March 2022 13:01:37(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
clane

Good Morning All,

Apologies if this had been previously asked.

I am currently dealing with a manager of a nursery who has ongoing concerns surrounding the safety of the little ones who have on occasion accessed (2) fire doors, one being a push bar and the other being a turn key fire exit door. I am due to visit the nusery next week for the first time and I do not have any floor plans for the building to hand so I am currently going on what I am being told is in place. 

The manager has said that on opening the (1) fire door it leads to a main road which can be accessed in a matter of seconds. The second fire door in the reception classroom leads to a pathway leading to a car park and then to the main road. I will only be able to determine if either are a safe place when I get there next week. 

A fire risk assessor has already visited the nursery and deemed that all necessary controls in place in relation to fire are both secure and appropriate, however the manager believes we should be doing more to prevent the kids from escaping the building, even to the point where they have said they will consider putting bolts on fire doors unless we take further action. (Yes I have pointed out this is in serious breach of regs etc). An alarm does sound on opening but manager thinks this isn't sufficient as little ones could still come to harm in the time it would take to get to them.  For me whilst she might be eliminating one hazard she's creating another one, but her thinking is that there is a greater chance of a child getting knocked down than there is of a fire. 

Can't help thinking this is more of a managing traffic flow/segregation issue more so than fire but I'd rather be pro-active than re-active. 

My options I've come up with to date include;

  1. Add mag locks to doors (previously suggested but rejected due to budget restraints)
  2. Re-position push bar/turn key higher up the door to prevent unauthorised access by kids. (would this affect the structural integrity of fire door in any way?) Is it even a consideration? This would obviously need to be factored into FRA as would require adult to always be available to access the door. 
  3. Manager rethinks traffic management plan
  4. Manager rethinks staff allocation, i.e. teacher/student ratio

Is there anything I haven't considered/forgotten?

Thanks

Roundtuit  
#2 Posted : 25 March 2022 15:01:39(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Roundtuit

If you alter a fire door the whole thing needs re-testing - they are only certified "as supplied" and fitted in accordance with manufacturer instruction.

If you move the mechanism "out of reach" would it also be out of reach for example to a wheel chair user?

For the pathway a gate could be fitted to prevent direct evacuation on to the car-park.

The first fire door spilling directly on to a main road sounds like a case of poor design (re-purposed building?).

Unfortunately little Houdini's will find ways round a lot of provisions even from secured car parks.

thanks 2 users thanked Roundtuit for this useful post.
clane on 25/03/2022(UTC), clane on 25/03/2022(UTC)
Roundtuit  
#3 Posted : 25 March 2022 15:01:39(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Roundtuit

If you alter a fire door the whole thing needs re-testing - they are only certified "as supplied" and fitted in accordance with manufacturer instruction.

If you move the mechanism "out of reach" would it also be out of reach for example to a wheel chair user?

For the pathway a gate could be fitted to prevent direct evacuation on to the car-park.

The first fire door spilling directly on to a main road sounds like a case of poor design (re-purposed building?).

Unfortunately little Houdini's will find ways round a lot of provisions even from secured car parks.

thanks 2 users thanked Roundtuit for this useful post.
clane on 25/03/2022(UTC), clane on 25/03/2022(UTC)
Connor35037  
#4 Posted : 25 March 2022 16:18:55(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Connor35037

Is there any way to create a secure perimeter between the final exit and the main road?

Kate  
#5 Posted : 25 March 2022 16:54:22(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Kate

But aren't these fire exits rather than fire doors?

clane  
#6 Posted : 25 March 2022 17:31:32(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
clane

I am keen to see why the idea of a secure perimeter fence hasn't already been suggested as this would seem the most reasonable solution, maybe I'll find out next week. 

Sorry for confusion, yes they are all final fire exits not fire doors.

Messy  
#7 Posted : 26 March 2022 14:06:18(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Messy

Its not unusual to have buildings which are occupied by people being cared for or otherwise where it is not desirable to permit them to leave the premises in an uncontrolled manner Some care homes, mental health units, police custody units, prisons, children's homes and nurseries all have reasons to restrct and control egress In such cases it is wholly acceptable to consider altering the means of escape doors for use by approved persons only. Mental health units often use key locks as do many of the other premises on my list. Of course it needs careful assessment and consideration to make sure whilst restricting or slowing the escape of vunerable persons, others aren't placed at risk - particularly the disabled In this case, perhaps a chain on the door (simple domestic door chain) might do the trick. They may have to be installed high on the door away from a childs reach. Or a chain and sprung loaded hook fastened to an eye. Both ideas are low tech, low cost Staff training, induction instruction and signs would support this idea. Perhaps painting the door yellow behind the chain would make it more visible Or do what you considered in your OP which is install door bolts at a high level. Similar control measures would be required (training /signs etc) along with regular checks on the door bolts as they can tend to get very stiff if the door warps or swells even a small amount in wet or dry weather I am suprised the fire risk assesor wasn't more helpful. To say current infrastructure is compliant when it creates another and more likely risk is only doing half the job So to sum up, you can restrict fire exit doors subject to a business case (why you're doing it) and a risk assessment (how you are intended to do it safely). Good luck
thanks 1 user thanked Messy for this useful post.
clane on 29/03/2022(UTC)
mihaibertea  
#8 Posted : 28 March 2022 15:46:31(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
mihaibertea

Hi Clane, have you visited the nursery? Would be interesting to see your findings. From the info provided it seems the fire door (1) is the final exit so might not be a fire door. Maybe they could consider installing the mag lock, the risk of having a child run over is greater than the cost of installing one. 

The second fire door in the reception area, usually has a child gate to keep the little ones if it's accessed by children. 

Users browsing this topic
Guest (3)
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.