Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

2 Pages12>
Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Philip Neal  
#1 Posted : 09 March 2022 15:03:11(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Philip Neal

It would be interesting to hear what companies are doing now that COVID guidelines have changed? and legally there is no need to self isolate.

So are you still allowing staff to come in with a postive test or do you send them home anyway?

If you allow staff in do you put controls in place, e.g seperate them from the rest of the team, ask them to wear a face covering and open windows for ventilation?

Kate  
#2 Posted : 09 March 2022 15:06:32(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Kate

I'm curious to hear what is the point of doing a test if no action is taken on a positive result ...

A Kurdziel  
#3 Posted : 09 March 2022 15:24:31(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
A Kurdziel

We have just been told that we can issue the stock of Department of Health lateral flow test kits(we are an educational establishment)  to people. A few weeks ago we were told that we were to stop issuing them and that the government might want them back. Today we can issue them out again but only if the person receiving them  passes one of two criteria; If they are working with vulnerable  people  or if they want to confirm that they are clear of infection after testing positive for the virus BUT we are not allowed to issue them for people who have not had a test yet but might have an infection ie day one people. So as we cannot issue them for day one people, so  there will not be any day 5 people but we could issue them on day 5  if there are day 1 people  but there aren’t so we can’t! I think that’s Catch-22!

thanks 1 user thanked A Kurdziel for this useful post.
peter gotch on 09/03/2022(UTC)
Andrew W Walker  
#4 Posted : 10 March 2022 09:32:08(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Andrew W Walker

Originally Posted by: A Kurdziel Go to Quoted Post

We have just been told that we can issue the stock of Department of Health lateral flow test kits(we are an educational establishment)  to people. A few weeks ago we were told that we were to stop issuing them and that the government might want them back. Today we can issue them out again but only if the person receiving them  passes one of two criteria; If they are working with vulnerable  people  or if they want to confirm that they are clear of infection after testing positive for the virus BUT we are not allowed to issue them for people who have not had a test yet but might have an infection ie day one people. So as we cannot issue them for day one people, so  there will not be any day 5 people but we could issue them on day 5  if there are day 1 people  but there aren’t so we can’t! I think that’s Catch-22!

My head hurts...

melrogers  
#5 Posted : 10 March 2022 13:03:21(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
melrogers

At the minute we are encouraging staff to follow the guidelines to isolate and are planning to continue to do so after the 1st April, though it will be much harder at this point. We have only just removed the requirement to social distance and still have other controls in place. 

It is such a challenge to get this right, but once people can't get hold of free tests I think that is when everyone will see the real challenges as people will not buy tests and will say it is just a cold and carry on!

kc1a06  
#6 Posted : 11 March 2022 13:28:47(UTC)
Rank: New forum user
kc1a06

we have a similar issue, at University approach is a 'sensible one,' stay at home if ill or suspect Covid-19, we are all expected to wear coverings, expected continue to test (we have seperate funded test prgram).

Its hard as the Goverment has legally lifted the restirctions and most people are following Government advice rather than the Uni advice

to be honest I have decided not to get wound up when people are not wearing coverings... and back in December and January I lost count of the number of close contacts I had and touch wood was not infected

I would have thought, employers must find out who has a serious medical condition, disability, long Covid  and takes all reasonable steps to prevent harm on that person 

allanwood  
#7 Posted : 18 March 2022 12:39:12(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
allanwood

As a construction company we are following the guidance from Build Uk which states that following a positive test the individual should undertake another lateral flow test on day five and if this is negative undertake another  test on day six, if this is again negative return to work.

My daughter has recently tested positive and she works in the banking sector and the above was also applied by her employer.

Hope this is of assistance.

Allan 

Cathy1975  
#8 Posted : 18 March 2022 15:17:27(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Cathy1975

With isolation not being mandortory anymore I'm unsure you can ask staff to stay away from work premises, if they test positive.

Most companies I'm sure will have their own procedures in place which hopefully majority of staff will adhere to.

It will be interesting how many people do attend work after the 24th march when isolation ssp ends.

A Kurdziel  
#9 Posted : 18 March 2022 15:52:21(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
A Kurdziel

Of course you can ask staff to stay from work if they think they have an infectious disease be it covid, flu or norovirus. There is to much presentism in this country, where people turn up just to be counted.  

Cathy1975  
#10 Posted : 18 March 2022 16:00:59(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Cathy1975

You can advise them to be at home but with no law in place to isolate it's very grey area to make them stay away, if people feel they are well enough to be at work (covid or any illness) I presume that's what a lot will do unfortunately. 

Roundtuit  
#11 Posted : 18 March 2022 17:23:19(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Roundtuit

Originally Posted by: kc1a06 Go to Quoted Post
I would have thought, employers must find out who has a serious medical condition, disability, long Covid  and takes all reasonable steps to prevent harm on that person

and step straight in to litigation by going Over The Top (remember the miss-management of English care workers & front line NHS staff with the mandatory vaccination policy to "protect the vulnerable") or not doing enough

you can't ask and you can't force despite what the baying mob were spouting at the end of last year

Roundtuit  
#12 Posted : 18 March 2022 17:23:19(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Roundtuit

Originally Posted by: kc1a06 Go to Quoted Post
I would have thought, employers must find out who has a serious medical condition, disability, long Covid  and takes all reasonable steps to prevent harm on that person

and step straight in to litigation by going Over The Top (remember the miss-management of English care workers & front line NHS staff with the mandatory vaccination policy to "protect the vulnerable") or not doing enough

you can't ask and you can't force despite what the baying mob were spouting at the end of last year

chris42  
#13 Posted : 18 March 2022 19:36:20(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
chris42

Originally Posted by: kc1a06 Go to Quoted Post

I would have thought, employers must find out who has a serious medical condition, disability, long Covid  and takes all reasonable steps to prevent harm on that person 

The employer can’t insist the employee provide them with medical information (there may be a couple of exemptions to this), but generally no. Therefore, you may not know who the vulnerable are and more importantly who may have covid.

Nope it’s just a cold, honest guv, no not lying, I like to cross my fingers behind my back its comforting. If I would get sick pay, I might have covid, but I’m not paying for or taking a test and you can’t make me. Even if I have taken a medical test, I don’t have to tell you the result. It’s just a cold I can’t afford to have covid because you don’t pay me enough.

So as far as I can see anything a company puts in place around this is unenforceable. The only ones who will comply are the genuine honest people who can afford to be off and those wishing to skive.

Chris

HSSnail  
#14 Posted : 21 March 2022 07:58:40(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
HSSnail

So as far as I can see anything a company puts in place around this is unenforceable. The only ones who will comply are the genuine honest people who can afford to be off and those wishing to skive.

Chris

I agree Chris (dont know why your sentrance is not showing as a quote) - had a bit of a sore throat this morning so thought i would do the decent thing and test. Came back posative so its working from home for me for the next 5 days at least. But im lucky i can do this, and if i become two ill to work i will get full sick pay. I have felt worse with a "common cold". Not sure people who are unable to work from home or onlt get SSP would feel the same way. I have informed my employer but as far as i can see there is no legal duty to do so.

Edited by user 21 March 2022 08:00:07(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

Kate  
#15 Posted : 21 March 2022 19:43:38(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Kate

There was a legal duty to inform your employer but this is one of the measures that have recently been abolished.

matelot1965  
#16 Posted : 26 March 2022 20:33:27(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
matelot1965

After April 1st when you no longer need it within your risk assessments are we worried - No Hazard, No Risk, No Control (It does not mean I agree with it)

pseudonym  
#17 Posted : 28 March 2022 08:44:58(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
pseudonym

Except that in Wales a site-specifc Covid risk assessment is still a legal requirement until at least the 14th of April, when the situation is next due for review 

“From Monday, face coverings will no longer be required by law in retail settings and on public transport, though they will continue to be recommended in public health advice.

And the requirement to self-isolate will also move into guidance. A £500 self-isolation payment to support people will continue to be available until June.

However, 2 key legal protections will remain in place as coronavirus cases have risen sharply in recent weeks, driven by the BA.2 sub-type of the omicron variant.

Face coverings will remain a legal requirement in health and social care settings and coronavirus risk assessments must continue to be carried out by businesses, with reasonable measures put in place in light of those assessments." ​​​​​​​https://gov.wales/coronavirus

A Kurdziel  
#18 Posted : 28 March 2022 11:42:39(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
A Kurdziel

“coronavirus risk assessments must continue to be carried out by businesses, with reasonable measures put in place in light of those assessments.”

Exactly which piece of legislation (Welsh or otherwise) states that employers must include the risk from a public health matter in workplace risk assessment?

Furthermore what is the point in a ”risk assessment” , where you have manage a risk which is a) out of your control and b) you cannot apply the effective controls.

thanks 1 user thanked A Kurdziel for this useful post.
RVThompson on 28/03/2022(UTC)
pseudonym  
#19 Posted : 28 March 2022 11:49:58(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
pseudonym

Regulation 16 of the Health Protection (Coronavirus Restrictions) (No.5) Wales Regulations 2020, as amended

I knew someone would question it, thats why its a direct quote from last weeks First Minister's press statement and link to the Welsh Government website to check up 

chris42  
#20 Posted : 28 March 2022 12:36:07(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
chris42

However, reg3 was amended in the amendment regulations and is now

Expiry

3.  These Regulations expire at the end of the day on [F128 March 2022].

 

But then the latest Gov guidance dated 3 days ago still has a requirement for RA ?

Not sure they have all their dragons in a row!

Chris

pseudonym  
#21 Posted : 28 March 2022 12:48:30(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
pseudonym

You could try looking at ammedment no 8?

And yes guidance nearly always follows on (slowly) from the regulatory changes

If you're based in Wales you of coursee have the option to disregard the quote I've supplied - like you can ignore any legislation / regulation - you just look awfully stupid when you get caught out! 

As for me, I'm making sure that there is a document that refers to covid for our new location (in Wales) when it is formally handed over to us at the end of this month

Already on record as saying much the same as others, that this is a public health matter and not H&S, but unfortunately, here in Wales our legislators see differently 

A Kurdziel  
#22 Posted : 28 March 2022 13:01:21(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
A Kurdziel

There is list of possible measures included in step 3 but it does not make it clear when these are “reasonably”. So if you say that we have not done anything  and we have not had an outbreak is that good enough or were you expected to send your employees home until you had completely rebuilt you premises to make them “covid safe” , or was this just window dressing like it was in England?

 

chris42  
#23 Posted : 28 March 2022 14:13:39(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
chris42

Originally Posted by: pseudonym Go to Quoted Post

You could try looking at ammedment no 8?

The amendment number 8 does not appear to amend reg 3. The last change to reg 3 was as below which changed it to 28/03/2022, when it states these regulation expire ?

F1  Words in reg. 3 substituted (18.2.2022) by The Health Protection (Coronavirus Restrictions) (No. 5) (Wales) (Amendment) (No. 5) Regulations 2022 (S.I. 2022/142)regs. 1(2)2(2)

 What are you referring to in amendment 8 ? I have a couple of sites in Wales, so this is of interest for me. Are you are saying that that The Health Protection (Coronavirus Restrictions) (No. 5) (Wales) regulations 2022 is still in force.

Chris

pseudonym  
#24 Posted : 28 March 2022 14:36:28(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
pseudonym

Folks - don't blame the messenger .. .

Welsh First Minister's statement cut and pasted directly from Welsh Govenrment press release - now it could be that the Welsh Government have got things wrong, but check it out for your self. .. 

As far as I am aware, at least until the next three weekly review, all business premises in Wales are still required to have a covid risk assessment - what you put in it (like any risk assessment) is your business.

Wales was always more zealous in the implementation of the Covid Regs (2m social distance actually was in the Regs in Wales, and suggesting that employees could be fined if they set out for work this January if the could have worked from home, for example). You could also have a look at "Together for a safer future: Wales' long-term Covid 19 transition from pandemic to endemic" document from earlier this month - dropped big hints about covid risk assessment in there as well

chris42  
#25 Posted : 28 March 2022 14:57:29(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
chris42

What are you referring to in amendment 8 ? I have a couple of sites in Wales, so this is of interest for me. Are you are saying that that The Health Protection (Coronavirus Restrictions) (No. 5) (Wales) regulations 2022 is still in force.

Not having a go Pseudonym, just trying to get to the bottom of the issue, through the nightmare of amendments and thought you spotted something I missed.

As I noted earlier the guidance from 3 days ago still has the requirement to risk assess and it states this is under the HASAWA, which is contrary to that the English Government think as they have removed the requirement.

And I agree with the others was never really part of HASAWA or any of the legislation that comes under it as far as general workers or public are concerned.

This is a pain in the 8u77 for me as we have one office where the only real control, we could implement was 50% have to work from home, but now getting complaints about mental health. However, if I bring them back, we have zip other significant controls, due to age of building and its layout. So my RA will be short and along the lines of “no worse than going to the pub!” Despite rates rising again everywhere.

Chris

pseudonym  
#26 Posted : 28 March 2022 15:07:21(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
pseudonym

Chris - not all of the Regs - just the bits about the risk assessment and face masks in health and social care settings - all the other parts have been binned - check the BBC Wales website for more accessible information - the Welsh Government's website is a bit of a pain to navigate around and find things. I ended up setting up my mobile phone to get email alerts whenever they actually published anything (rather than said or announced it)

Like you I wish it was otherwise, and not sure I trust the FM and his minions to repeal everything on April 14th either. Devolved adminsitrations, eh? Not sure this was what people wanted when they voted

Try https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/uk-wales-60861963 for details of FM's statement

Edited by user 28 March 2022 15:25:02(UTC)  | Reason: added something useful?

pseudonym  
#27 Posted : 29 March 2022 12:20:23(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
pseudonym

As an addition the Welsh Govenrment have just, today issued their updated guidance to the general public - Alert Level 0: guidance for the public - though still no sign (yet) of any simalar guidance document for business

achrn  
#28 Posted : 30 March 2022 07:50:47(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
achrn

English government have made an announcement saying new 'rules' from Friday, and they'll tell you what they are on Friday:

https://www.gov.uk/government/news/government-sets-out-next-steps-for-living-with-covid

Some parts of the new guidance are in that announcement, including:

From 1 April, updated guidance will advise people with symptoms of a respiratory infection, including COVID-19, and a high temperature or who feel unwell, to try stay at home and avoid contact with other people, until they feel well enough to resume normal activities and they no longer have a high temperature. Until 1 April individuals should continue to follow the current guidance.

From 1 April, anyone with a positive COVID-19 test result will be advised to try to stay at home and avoid contact with other people for five days, which is when they are most infectious.

and

Principles that employers can follow will also be published on 1 April to help them decide how to reduce risks in their workplace

Because obviously no-one actually needs to know what the rules are before the game starts, do they.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Calvin_and_Hobbes#Calvinball

Edited by user 30 March 2022 07:51:47(UTC)  | Reason: link formatting

Cathy1975  
#29 Posted : 30 March 2022 09:27:49(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Cathy1975

Originally Posted by: achrn Go to Quoted Post

English government have made an announcement saying new 'rules' from Friday, and they'll tell you what they are on Friday:

https://www.gov.uk/government/news/government-sets-out-next-steps-for-living-with-covid

Some parts of the new guidance are in that announcement, including:

From 1 April, updated guidance will advise people with symptoms of a respiratory infection, including COVID-19, and a high temperature or who feel unwell, to try stay at home and avoid contact with other people, until they feel well enough to resume normal activities and they no longer have a high temperature. Until 1 April individuals should continue to follow the current guidance.

From 1 April, anyone with a positive COVID-19 test result will be advised to try to stay at home and avoid contact with other people for five days, which is when they are most infectious.

and

Principles that employers can follow will also be published on 1 April to help them decide how to reduce risks in their workplace

Because obviously no-one actually needs to know what the rules are before the game starts, do they.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Calvin_and_Hobbes#Calvinball

That's typical goverment...clear as mud...do but don't....should but shouldn't....can but can't
chris42  
#30 Posted : 30 March 2022 14:31:04(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
chris42

However the good news is that the HSE are to review their web page on this tomorrow, are we all holding our breath?

https://www.hse.gov.uk/coronavirus/working-safely/risk-assessment.htm

thanks 1 user thanked chris42 for this useful post.
Monika R on 30/03/2022(UTC)
pseudonym  
#31 Posted : 30 March 2022 14:57:42(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
pseudonym

And Chris42 - the very latest Welsh Guidance for business is available at

https://gov.wales/alert-level-0-guidance-employers-businesses-and-organisations-html

but not yet in downloadable pdf format

chris42  
#32 Posted : 30 March 2022 15:28:19(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
chris42

The way I now see this is that the Welsh Gov are now relying on the HASAWA and the legislation that comes under it to get people to do a risk assessment for the corona virus. Welsh specific legislation has now expired. But like others I consider this a public health issue (they even use that term) and not a workplace one. Therefore, as H&S legislation is policed by the HSE (for both England and Wales), the moment they officially state that a RA is not required – then its not required anywhere not just in England.

So, it will be interesting to see what they put on their updated web page or will that page just disappear from the face of the earth, with no further comment.

The guidance document from the Welsh Gov is just guidance, who would enforce it?

Chris

HSSnail  
#33 Posted : 31 March 2022 07:11:23(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
HSSnail

Originally Posted by: chris42 Go to Quoted Post

However the good news is that the HSE are to review their web page on this tomorrow, are we all holding our breath?

https://www.hse.gov.uk/coronavirus/working-safely/risk-assessment.htm

fortunatly before i moved into safety i was a SCUBA instructor - so I can hold my breath for a long time.

pseudonym  
#34 Posted : 31 March 2022 08:23:00(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
pseudonym

Sorry Chris42 - I have to disagree, not all the Wlesh Covid legislation has expired - the FM explicity said that and the guidance also re-states that, as does the BBC and the Western Mail - they could all be wrong or lying, but perhaps not.

As for your fatalistic comments about who enforces the law ... just because it won't be enforced doesn't make it any less the law, or have I m issed something. Might be a 'bad' law, might not make any sense, might never be enforced .. .. like I said we all do what we see fit under the circumstances

chris42  
#35 Posted : 31 March 2022 08:54:19(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
chris42

Hi pseudonym, no problem with you disagreeing this is after all a discussion forum. So, then I have to ask the question which piece of legislation calls for us to do a risk assessment specifically for Covid which is not a workplace hazard.

The legislation referred to in the posts above specifically in Wales have expired – no longer in force -so not law.

If you follow the links in the Welsh guidance document, we have both referred to, they take you to the general HSE web site and to the Management Regulations which is what calls for Risk assessment for workplace hazards. The Welsh Government are implying that it is covered by this legislation. I don’t think it is. However, if it is then it also applies in England. Then we have the situation that the English Government have stated it is not required anymore.

If the existing H&S legislation covers this issue, then why did the Welsh Gov create separate legislation calling for it and put a time limit on it.

So, the question which has been much debated on this web site is does everyone think that public health issues such as covid are covered by normal H&S legislation?

If it is, then we all have to have a risk assessment covering it, otherwise none of us do (both England and Wales). So, what are people views.

Chris

A Kurdziel  
#36 Posted : 31 March 2022 08:55:01(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
A Kurdziel

pseudonym

‘Bad’ laws do exist and the powers that be know they are bad laws and choose not to enforce them.

The classic example is what happened in the aftermath of  Summers (John) & Sons Ltd V Frost (1955) 1 A11 ER 870.  Basically Frost  was injured when a grinding wheel  he was using shattered. His employer argued that they had done everything reasonably practicable to prevent the accident and so they were not negligent. Frost’s lawyers argued that under the Factories Act 1937 the employer was required to guard are dangerous machine parts. There was no qualification on that duty and since Frost was injured the grinding wheel was evidently a dangerous machine part, which needed guarding. Of course, if you fully guard a grinding wheel it becomes useless, but that was now the legal requirement until the factories Act 1961 changed the law. The Factories Inspectorate (precursor to the HSE)  did not suddenly order all grinding wheels to be enclosed; they simple chose not to enforce this impractical law.

A more modern example is that there is nothing in the Health and Safety at Work Act that prevents the HSE investigating work related RTA’s on public highways. They choose not and leave it to the police to deal with them under other legislation. 

pseudonym  
#37 Posted : 31 March 2022 09:14:04(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
pseudonym

Chris42 - we are agreed on everything except  whether or not a site specific coronavirus risk assessment is legally required in Wales

A Kurdziel - thanks for the reference, but my point is that it is my view, having read an awful lot of the specifically Welsh guidance, FM statements and what bits of the law I can face on an empty stomach, that the legislators in Wales - the Welsh Government have actually kept this part of the legislation in force - as to whether anyone is every brought to account for breaching this legislation - in Wales Local Authority Inspectors have closed premises and brought fines for pubs and a cinema that I can recall - the HSE may or may not bother, we will find out in the fullness of time. But until it stops being the law, it is the law (at least until April 14th when the next review is due to take place)

chris42  
#38 Posted : 01 April 2022 08:04:50(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
chris42

Originally Posted by: chris42 Go to Quoted Post

So, it will be interesting to see what they put on their updated web page or will that page just disappear from the face of the earth, with no further comment.

alert! Sorry we couldn't find that page (404 error)

What a surprise

Pseudonym and I disagree on if there is any actual legislation opposed to guidance or drivel coming from the First Minister, still requiring a formal risk assessment. No clarification from the HSE, so we are left on our own as normal.

Chris

pseudonym  
#39 Posted : 01 April 2022 08:25:28(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
pseudonym

Coronavirus (COVID-19) – Advice for workplaces (hse.gov.uk)

Quote from above -

"HSE no longer requires every business to consider COVID-19 in their risk assessment or to have specific measures in place. There is a requirement to protect those who will come into contact with the virus due to their work activity.

There is advice for people who may be at higher risk such as those who are immunosuppressed.

There is currently a specific public health requirement for a risk assessment and reasonable measures in Wales but this is not regulated by HSE."

So we are both "right" Chris -but as I said before - we're all free to do what we want to do. Since we are occupying a newly refurbished building next week and were visited by HSE earlier in the pandemic at our original site, I think it is prudent to have a site specific risk assessment in place for the new building. Do I think it makes sense - no

Holliday42333  
#40 Posted : 01 April 2022 08:46:01(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Holliday42333

I think its insightful that the HSE have dropped Covid as soon as possible but .gov have not changed their website guidance as promptly

thanks 2 users thanked Holliday42333 for this useful post.
HSSnail on 01/04/2022(UTC), Kate on 01/04/2022(UTC)
HSSnail  
#41 Posted : 01 April 2022 09:37:19(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
HSSnail

Originally Posted by: Holliday42333 Go to Quoted Post

I think its insightful that the HSE have dropped Covid as soon as possible but .gov have not changed their website guidance as promptly

I agree - like a lot of us I think HSE always felt it was a public health issue but were backed into a corner - also interesting to see they are now also quoteing that COSHH only applies to viruses when in a lab setting etc and not to respitory infections passed between collegues at work - its almost like they have been reading this forum!

thanks 2 users thanked HSSnail for this useful post.
A Kurdziel on 01/04/2022(UTC), Kate on 01/04/2022(UTC)
Users browsing this topic
Guest (3)
2 Pages12>
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.