Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
philb  
#1 Posted : 27 February 2023 09:19:40(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
philb

Is there a correct way to cite amended regulations where an amendment has altered the original ones slightly. For example PPE regs 1992 amendd this year - is it correct to say PPE regs 1992 (as amended).

Cant seem to source for this

Kate  
#2 Posted : 27 February 2023 09:54:43(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Kate

Yes it is correct, or at least universal.  I am sure there was an earlier thread on this topic.

thanks 1 user thanked Kate for this useful post.
philb on 27/02/2023(UTC)
A Kurdziel  
#3 Posted : 27 February 2023 11:08:03(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
A Kurdziel

What often happens is that a regulation is amended by a Statutory Instrument with a completely different name to the original regulation.  So rather than quote a whole series of regulations whose sole purpose is to amend another regulation it is much clearly to simply add “as amended”.  

 

peter gotch  
#4 Posted : 27 February 2023 11:21:08(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
peter gotch

Morning Phil

This is one of those QQ that keeps the ISO auditors excited when they ask about your legislative register and want you to be able to cite chapter and verse about the 17 amendments to a particular item of legislation.

Which is completely unnecessary, at least in the UK, if you simply keep defaulting to the current version on legislation.gov.uk.

I can assure you that when I worked for the HSE many moons ago and wrote a prosecution report about e.g. a defective scaffold, I did not write Regulation X of the Construction (Working Places) Regulations 1966 as amended by SI 1970 No 1457, SI 1974 No 1975, SI 1984 No 235 or whatever - including whichever code of regulations it was that said that instead of 6 feet 6 inches you were to read 2 metres.

I wrote Regulation X of the Construction (Working Places) Regulations 1966.

It might have occasionally have been Regulation X(A) where an extra requirement had been added and given the number X(A).

Keep it simple!

Please do NOT look up all those Statutory Instruments - they were probably made but they were just numbers off the top of my head which bear absolutely no relevance to the long since revoked Working Places Regs (RIP).

thanks 1 user thanked peter gotch for this useful post.
A Kurdziel on 27/02/2023(UTC)
A Kurdziel  
#5 Posted : 09 March 2023 09:45:53(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
A Kurdziel

Can I sue for plagiarism? 

thanks 1 user thanked A Kurdziel for this useful post.
peter gotch on 09/03/2023(UTC)
Users browsing this topic
Guest (3)
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.