Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Kevinmo  
#1 Posted : 27 March 2023 11:24:06(UTC)
Rank: New forum user
Kevinmo

Hello all,

Whilst lifting a bin of feed with a hoist, a link on the chain broke and the bin fell to the ground. No one was injured. 

RIDDOR regs state that a chain is an accessory and It does not cover the failure of ancillary equipment, such as electric operating buttons or radius indicators, or failures of lifting accessories, such as chains and slings.Grey area.

Can someone advise if this incident falls under dangerous occurrance and is reportable under RIDDOR?

Appreciate your response.

Kevin

Edited by user 27 March 2023 12:53:32(UTC)  | Reason: Spelling mistake

M.cooper.99  
#2 Posted : 27 March 2023 12:33:41(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
M.cooper.99

Hi Kevin,

I'm currently an apprentice in OHS so I can't give any experienced advice im afraid, but since there have been no replies so far I think your best bet would be to contact the HSE and ask. You can find their details here: Ask about health and safety - Contact HSE

I think opinions would vary on this, especially after looking at an old thread from 2006.

Regards

Mathew

thanks 1 user thanked M.cooper.99 for this useful post.
Kevinmo on 27/03/2023(UTC)
chris42  
#3 Posted : 27 March 2023 12:41:37(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
chris42

You have answered your own question, so not sure why you think it is a grey area? A chain is an accessory and accessories are specifically excluded in RIDDOR Dangerous occurrence Schedule 2.

So no it is not reportable to HSE, just your own inhouse recording and investigation.

Edited by user 27 March 2023 12:42:30(UTC)  | Reason: extra t

thanks 3 users thanked chris42 for this useful post.
Kevinmo on 27/03/2023(UTC), M.cooper.99 on 27/03/2023(UTC), IanSmith on 06/04/2023(UTC)
achrn  
#4 Posted : 27 March 2023 13:58:16(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
achrn

I don't think it's quite as simple as a chain is always (and by definition) an accessory.

The RIDDOR regs require reports of "failure of any load-bearing part of any lifting equipment, other than an accessory for lifting" and the HSE guidance (as quoted above) says " It does not cover ... failures of lifting accessories, such as chains and slings."

If it's a link in a set of lifting chains, I'd agree that's a lifting accessory and not reportable (though I've never really understood why not - a dropped load is a dropped load, as far as I'm concerned, and it's no less dangerous if it was an accessory that failed).

If it's a link in a chain-hoist chain, then I think that's a primary part of the lifting equipment, and that does require a report.

thanks 2 users thanked achrn for this useful post.
M.cooper.99 on 27/03/2023(UTC), Kevinmo on 28/03/2023(UTC)
Holliday42333  
#5 Posted : 27 March 2023 14:05:29(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Holliday42333

I agree with achrn.

If the chain is part of the hoist mechanism its reportable.

If the chain attaches the load to the hoist, its an accessory and is not reportable.

thanks 2 users thanked Holliday42333 for this useful post.
Kevinmo on 28/03/2023(UTC), Hallijay on 02/04/2023(UTC)
Kate  
#6 Posted : 27 March 2023 16:49:05(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Kate

Presumably you can tell the difference from the LOLER inspection schedule, which will almost certainly be 6 monthly if it is an accessory and otherwise annually.  (I realise this is backwards as it is whether it is an accessory that determines the inspection schedule and not the other way around!)

thanks 1 user thanked Kate for this useful post.
Kevinmo on 28/03/2023(UTC)
chris42  
#7 Posted : 28 March 2023 07:35:57(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
chris42

My response was due to the OP referring to the chain as an accessory. As Kate notes if the hoist and chain have separate reports then then the chain is not an integral part of the lifting equipment (or due to time interval). Perhaps the OP would confirm if it is a chain hoist we are talking about. I’m sure in the dim and distant past though a HSE inspector told me they were not interested in chains full stop, but opinions change.

I have always found it a bit odd that chains are considered an accessory and not reportable if they fail also. The only reason could think of is that if a chain or sling etc failed the load would come down and no one should stand below a suspended load. However, the DO is about collapse and overturning, which means it is possible for it not to go straight down. Don't know if this thought is right though.

peter gotch  
#8 Posted : 28 March 2023 11:22:52(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
peter gotch

Hi Kevin

The scope of what should and should not be reportable as a Dangerous Occurrence is a fine line decided by civil servants but the lines drawn in RIDDOR are historic.

Before RIDDOR, there was the previous RIDDOR. Before that NADOR, before that various requirements depending on sector IF covered by health and safety law.

So, in Factories, as far back as The Dangerous Occurrences (Notifications) Regulations 1947 (and probably earlier!) where the Schedule included:

"2. Collapse or overturning of a crane, derrick, winch, hoist, or other appliance used in raising or lowering.......or any part thereof (except the breakage of chain or rope slings)......."

As you concluded in your posting, not reportable under RIDDOR assuming that the chain is attached to the lifting appliance as an accesssory.

The accessory forms part of the LOAD to be lifted!

Users browsing this topic
Guest (3)
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.