Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Baron  
#1 Posted : 08 June 2023 17:50:31(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Baron

Chums. Would you consider that a case of HAVs Stage 1 or 2 should be recorded in the Total Recordable Injury Rate (TRIR). HAVS is of course an occupational disease. Naturally formal HSE Reporting under RIDDOR is not in question, rather do you record an occupational disease in your TRIR or equivalent, where it is not a lost time (injury). Ta.

Edited by user 08 June 2023 18:18:02(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

Kate  
#2 Posted : 08 June 2023 18:10:41(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Kate

TRIR stands for ...?

Baron  
#3 Posted : 08 June 2023 18:22:52(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Baron

Originally Posted by: Kate Go to Quoted Post
TRIR stands for ...?
Total Recordable Injury Rate
Kate  
#4 Posted : 09 June 2023 09:55:28(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Kate

Is this a rate based on OSHA criteria? (I ask because 'recordable' is an OSHA term.)  If so then you would need to check what OSHA consider to be a recordable injury and whether or not it could include HAVS.  OSHA have a bottomless FAQ about which things are recordable and which are not, so the authoritative answer is likely to be either in their definition or in the clarifying examples.

It's not like RIDDOR where as standard we debate different opinions about whether a given incident is reportable or not - in the US, there is little scope for doubt because the regulator (OSHA) has a history of engaging with questions about what is recordable and publishing the answers on its website, to an alarming degree of precision.

Elfin_Safety  
#5 Posted : 09 June 2023 11:29:42(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Elfin_Safety

Can't comment on OSHA or other territories where reporting such a rate is a regulatory requirement, but for internal reporting it would likely depend on how you have chosen to define injury.

As a disease, the symptoms may have been triggered by a particular task but the damage is not caused by one identifiable incident, so I would not record it as an injury and so not include it in that stat. 

Previous workplaces have combined lost time injury and (occupational) illness as a single statistic, but if there is a need to track both I believe it is more useful from a risk reduction perspective to treat them seperately as the causes are often quite different.

Edited by user 09 June 2023 11:30:12(UTC)  | Reason: typo

Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.