Rank: New forum user
|
I need to calculate the Accident Frequency Rate for my employer over each of the years 2019 to 2022, seperately. I know there is a formula: Number of reported accidents x ??? / Hours worked My question is, how do I find the correct ??? figure for the manufacturing industry in UK?
I came across a website that quoted 200,000 as the ??? but it was generic, didn't refer to a year or an industry sector.
Edited by user 27 September 2023 12:54:19(UTC)
| Reason: spelling mistake
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
That depends. When I was in construction we could never benchmark against our competitors as we all used differnt way to calculate. The hours worked we used was 100,00 where as some used 200,00. Plus there is the factor of who you included and excluded.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
200,000 is a significant sweat shop 100,000 hours at 8 hours is 12,500 days, at 5 days is 2,500 weeks, at 50 weeks is 50 years
If we get educated until 18 and retire at 68 (current ages) then 100,000 hours is circa one persons working life
https://www.hse.gov.uk/statistics/lfs/injury.htm
|
2 users thanked Roundtuit for this useful post.
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
200,000 is a significant sweat shop 100,000 hours at 8 hours is 12,500 days, at 5 days is 2,500 weeks, at 50 weeks is 50 years
If we get educated until 18 and retire at 68 (current ages) then 100,000 hours is circa one persons working life
https://www.hse.gov.uk/statistics/lfs/injury.htm
|
2 users thanked Roundtuit for this useful post.
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
HSE https://www.hse.gov.uk/statistics/adhoc-analysis/injury-frequency-rates.pdf uses 1,000,000 (i.e. one million, 1E6) - see page 2 of the document. So that's what I use. But you can use whatever you like - it's one of the reasons why tender questions that just ask 'what is your incident rate' with no other detail are so meaningless. Next question is do they want rate of serious injury? RIDDOR or more? lost time or more? first aid or more? or do they want to know the rate including every last paper cut and 'stapled-my-own-thumb' case? Whatever number you give them it will need a statement about what it is anyway, so pick your own number. (That HSE document uses 100,000 when calculating the rate per worker, not the rate per hour. The Labour Force Survey reports injury rates per 100,000 workers, so if you want to compare with per hour figures you need to use e.g. the ONS data about average hours worked by sector.)
|
1 user thanked achrn for this useful post.
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Hi Paul The 200,000 hours probably came from someone working to US OSHA standards (whether or not in North America). ...and it got taken into the method of reporting set out in Global Reporting Initiative GRI 403 - see page 20 at gri-403-occupational-health-and-safety-2018.pdf (globalreporting.org) But in the UK probably most organisation which bother to count probably still opt for the method recommended by HSE which looks at workers rather than the hours they work. As has already been said if you want to do any "benchmarking" you need to be very careful to check that people are comparing apples with apples.
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.