Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
RayRapp  
#1 Posted : 03 August 2012 14:09:25(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
RayRapp

In a office environment with about 30 staff what would be an acceptable frequency for the cleaning of urinals and cubicles, eg, once per week, two or three times per week, everyday...? I have checked HSE guidance and regulations but nothing specific to my query. Thanks for you comments in advance - Ray
JJ Prendergast  
#2 Posted : 03 August 2012 14:18:28(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
JJ Prendergast

What does life experience suggest to you? Daily seems the normal in my work experience.
MaxPayne  
#3 Posted : 03 August 2012 14:29:49(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
MaxPayne

RayRapp wrote:
In a office environment with about 30 staff what would be an acceptable frequency for the cleaning of urinals and cubicles, eg, once per week, two or three times per week, everyday...? I have checked HSE guidance and regulations but nothing specific to my query. Thanks for you comments in advance - Ray
Ray, I've seen you posting on this forum for ages, and with the greatest respect I can't believe you've had to ask that question.
User is suspended until 03/02/2041 16:40:57(UTC) Ian.Blenkharn  
#4 Posted : 03 August 2012 14:32:55(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Ian.Blenkharn

Ask your Mum, she will know best!
RayRapp  
#5 Posted : 03 August 2012 14:47:22(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
RayRapp

Max, a pretty basic question - granted, but needs must...LOL!
Davies36197  
#6 Posted : 03 August 2012 14:47:48(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Davies36197

We have come a long way since OSR and Factories Act proscriptive requirements WHSW Reg 9 Para 68 -72 (Efective and Suitable) and Reg 20 2 (b) Clean and orderly But dont eat your "Friday Chippy Tea" in there
smitch  
#7 Posted : 03 August 2012 16:31:35(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
smitch

Davies36197 wrote:
But don't eat your "Friday Chippy Tea" in there
Must be made of Money, I could only run to "pea wet and scraps"
Graham Bullough  
#8 Posted : 03 August 2012 18:57:53(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Graham Bullough

As an aside regarding Ian.B's response at #4, some of us no longer have mums around to consult about such matters. In view of this, perhaps there's scope for some enterprising person to set up an "ask-a-mum" website for advice regarding matters about which mums tend to be knowledgeable! Though I rarely go to cinemas, as a fiftysomething orphan I might find such a service useful if perchance I wanted to see a film with a "PG" (parental guidance) rating! :-)
Canopener  
#9 Posted : 03 August 2012 19:40:13(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Canopener

Fantastic idea Graham, sadly my Mum is no longer with us and I have resorted to asking the girls in the office to tie my shoe laces for me. I refuse to wear 'slip ons'. It just wish they wouldn't tie those double knots! Daily doesn't seem unreasonable?
GeoffB4  
#10 Posted : 04 August 2012 08:58:30(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
GeoffB4

We clean ours once a year, whether it needs it or not.
Graham Bullough  
#11 Posted : 04 August 2012 11:41:07(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Graham Bullough

GeoffB4's response reminds me of an acquaintance who once commented that he always changed his underwear once a week whether it was necessary or not! Evidently he'd either lost his mum earlier than most men or she wasn't an especially diligent mum. One definition of a mum is a woman who always hopes that her offspring, irrespective of age, wear reasonably clean underwear just in case they ever need to be taken urgently to hospital! When I mentioned this to friend with experience as an A&E consultant, he said that hospital staff were too busy focusing on what treatment a newly admitted patient needed to notice the state of his/her clothing. However, if sufficient numbers of mums campaigned for it, perhaps the NHS could be persuaded to amend its patient admission record sheet to include an underwear rating scale ranging from 'commendable' to 'tut tut/deplorable' ! :-) Ray - As your thread hasn't been treated with sufficient gravitas so far (and for which I plead guilty regarding my earlier jocular responses), here are some thoughts regarding your initial question: As with many topics which appear on this forum, the answer depends on the circumstances at the actual workplace involved. If the employees appreciate the facilities and use them in a reasonable manner, the facilities obviously won't need to be cleaned as often as ones which quickly become smelly and visibly mucky. I've had a quick look through my copy of "Redgrave's Health and Safety in Factories" to see if Section 7 of the now obsolete Factories Act 1961 contained any stipulations about cleaning frequency. It simply says that 'sufficient and suitable sanitary conveniences ...should be provided, maintained and kept clean..." Section 7 is accompanied by "The Sanitary Acccommodation Regulations 1938". However, these simply deal with design aspects and numbers of urinals and WCs in relation to numbers of employees, and are 'silent' (to use a posh legal expression) about cleaning frequency. Perhaps suitably knowledgeable forum users can advise about what sort of germs proliferate on what surfaces at urinals and WCs, with what speeds and whether or not they pose significant health risks. (Apparently scientists have advised that computer keyboards are notably dirtier in this regard than many surfaces in toilet facilities.) Also, appropriate advice about such matters ought to be available from members of the British Institute of Cleaning Science (BICS).
david leniewski  
#12 Posted : 04 August 2012 12:34:33(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
david leniewski

an office with 30 staff, mixed sex, different toilet facilities, surely if its found to be in a bit of a state, is there no one to report it to, I have just audited a construction site, the welfare facilities were in a bit of a mess, regarding floors (muddy conditions ect) I have recommended the guys designate a person to check the facilities prior to use, In the olden days on site we had a cabin lad, as its perks. Garage welfare facilities can be messy due to types of hand cleaners, I would have thought office staff should have enough common sense, to sort this out or are they all to important, and if you have a tounge in your head use it, (not to clean the tiolets) report them
User is suspended until 03/02/2041 16:40:57(UTC) Ian.Blenkharn  
#13 Posted : 04 August 2012 14:03:15(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Ian.Blenkharn

Now that we have reached unanimous agreement that Mum does indeed know best, it remains that some of her offspring did not learn at her apron strings and cannot now manage to deal with this toilet cleaning issue without the tick-box approach that gives the H&S professional such a bad name. No doubt the journalists are laughing all the way to the news desk. I despair!
Canopener  
#14 Posted : 05 August 2012 09:09:47(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Canopener

It is difficult not to have some empathy with Ian's response. On the one hand 'we' complain about excessive 'red tape' and over regulation, and on the other there seems to be an 'expectation' for there to be specific guidance on something as routine and mundane as loo cleaning. Surely most of us cope with far more complex decisions (even outside of our work) on a daily basis without the need to be led by the hand by some Whitehall Bureaucrat all the way to the, in this case, rather obvious answer.
messyshaw  
#15 Posted : 05 August 2012 09:46:56(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
messyshaw

Daily might not be enough. We had a new cleaner employed to do just that, but found within a couple of weeks, that although the building was relatively clean & tidy, the loos were very, very smelly. Plumbers came and went and said there was no blockage or air gap in the drains. It was all a bit of a mystery until a member of staff was using the urinals and saw the new cleaner wetting his mop by plunging it down the toilet bowl before proceeding to give the tiled floor a good old clean. So just because you clean the loos at your place of work daily, do not automatically think it will be clean !
chris42  
#16 Posted : 05 August 2012 10:33:02(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
chris42

Why not look at your options:- 1) Clean them daily 2) Clean them say 3 times a week ( Monday night, Wednesday night and Friday night) 3) Clean them once a week ( Friday night) The cleaning will probably be done by someone earning minimum wage so £6.08 an hour and lets say for 30 people two toilets ( Male and Female), so two WC’s, floors, wash hand basins and perhaps one urinal (1 hours work the lot?). We then get :- Option 1 5x 6.08 = £30.40/week Option 2 3x 6.08 =£18.24/week Option 3 1x 6.08 =£6.08/Week Starting with option 3, this just does not seem enough and would you get someone to do just one hour a week? Either option 1 or 2 could work, but is the organisation in such a financial state that it needs to save £12.16 a week, run the risk of annoying its staff and or visitors (Customers). Times are hard, but there has to be better business savings, so I would opt for every day if it were my company. I was curious to see if there was any guidance out there. There was no HSE guidance I could find, other than for construction sites where it suggests daily may not be enough, even found some OSHA documents, but also didn’t say much, all as you would expect.
User is suspended until 03/02/2041 16:40:57(UTC) Ian.Blenkharn  
#17 Posted : 05 August 2012 16:48:05(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Ian.Blenkharn

And by the time you've worked all that out you could have cleaned the toilets, washed your hands then made a cup pf tea, then got on with something useful!
Canopener  
#18 Posted : 05 August 2012 17:49:40(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Canopener

Strangely enough I drafted a reply earlier and decided not to post it, but I will try and reconstruct the gist of it from memory. I wonder if the recent responses will do little more than add to Ian's despair. That anyone, let alone a health and safety 'professional' should require or even expect specific guidance, complex matrices or other help rather than make limited use of that organic thing between their ears, escapes me. I didn't manage to recapture my previous draft but I know that Ray is sometimes known for trying to baffle us with Latin, so I'll try a not dissimilar approach "For to a folysshe demaunde behoueth a folysshe ansuere"
chris42  
#19 Posted : 05 August 2012 18:38:14(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
chris42

Ian, the above took longer to write than to think, it only took seconds. Even the maths could be done in the head, without the use of fingers and toes. Sadly my mum died when I was young, so was taught to think things through logically for myself, apologies if this has wasted valuable seconds of your ( or anyone else’s) life. Having seen the answers RayRapp normally provides on this forum, I feel there is a spot of devilish fun taking place here on his part, but others read these posts too.
User is suspended until 03/02/2041 16:40:57(UTC) Ian.Blenkharn  
#20 Posted : 05 August 2012 20:15:28(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Ian.Blenkharn

quote=chris42] Having seen the answers RayRapp normally provides on this forum, I feel there is a spot of devilish fun taking place here on his part, but others read these posts too.
That may now form the basis of a late rejoinder from the IP, but individuals must decide for themselves. Certainly the journalists that view us all with such disdain - I know, for the vast majority it's mutual - will draw their own and a very clear conclusion, and then tell the world. And you can't blame them for that. I despair, stil
Phillips20760  
#21 Posted : 06 August 2012 12:21:44(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Phillips20760

Oh dear. #14 spot on. Surely Mr. Rapp has resorted to the pastime of "Trolling"....?
Invictus  
#22 Posted : 06 August 2012 14:13:41(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Invictus

Common sense yet again!!!!!!
User is suspended until 03/02/2041 16:40:57(UTC) Ian.Blenkharn  
#23 Posted : 06 August 2012 14:25:27(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Ian.Blenkharn

Regrettably, it's not in plentiful supply is it?
Jeff Watt  
#24 Posted : 06 August 2012 19:03:57(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Jeff Watt

What are those 30 blighters doing away from the desk in the first place. Sarnt(sic) major voice Steady lads wait for it...wait for it...hold...hold
Zimmy  
#25 Posted : 06 August 2012 19:20:10(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Zimmy

How many at your home? How often is yours cleaned? Then workout the ratio re numbers using the one in work. It may work. On the other hand... :-)
Zimmy  
#26 Posted : 06 August 2012 19:20:50(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Zimmy

You is one cool dude Ray
Canopener  
#27 Posted : 06 August 2012 19:32:32(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Canopener

I can almost sense Ian's despair from here !!!!
Victor Meldrew  
#28 Posted : 06 August 2012 20:09:05(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Victor Meldrew

OMG - plenty of material here for Ben Elton :-)
RayRapp  
#29 Posted : 07 August 2012 10:50:54(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
RayRapp

Oh dear, how such a basic question can elicit so many different kinds of responses...it's bizarre! Indeed, if I still had a mum I might have asked her the same question and perhaps I lived a sheltered life. However, sometimes what might seem a simple question to one person is not quite so simple to another. There is no definitive document or guidance which I am aware of for the frequency of toilet cleaning and before I hit someone over the head (metaphorically speaking) I needed to gauge the opinion of others. So, thank you to all those who have taken the time and trouble to respond.
A Kurdziel  
#30 Posted : 07 October 2021 08:57:32(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
A Kurdziel

eh?

Roundtuit  
#31 Posted : 07 October 2021 09:51:16(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Roundtuit

Clickbait - no one ressurects a 2012 post for any other reason

thanks 2 users thanked Roundtuit for this useful post.
peter gotch on 07/10/2021(UTC), peter gotch on 07/10/2021(UTC)
Roundtuit  
#32 Posted : 07 October 2021 09:51:16(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Roundtuit

Clickbait - no one ressurects a 2012 post for any other reason

thanks 2 users thanked Roundtuit for this useful post.
peter gotch on 07/10/2021(UTC), peter gotch on 07/10/2021(UTC)
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.