Rank: Forum user
|
Hi all, when inducting contractors on site - what should we be asking for, public or employers liability insurance certs (or both!). Thanks.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
You should look for both, decide a level that is acceptable to you considering the risks.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Depends on what these contractors are doing at your site. In all cases you want to know they have cover for their employees. If they are conducting work that could impact your employees or site visitors e.g. construction or refurbishment works then you want to be able to lay any public claim at their door for their acts or omissions. So by example:
for a photocopier engineer I would want employers liability for someone re-surfacing the car-park I would want public and employers liability
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Depends on what these contractors are doing at your site. In all cases you want to know they have cover for their employees. If they are conducting work that could impact your employees or site visitors e.g. construction or refurbishment works then you want to be able to lay any public claim at their door for their acts or omissions. So by example:
for a photocopier engineer I would want employers liability for someone re-surfacing the car-park I would want public and employers liability
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
We ask for both, PI is a nicety unless providing advice, then we have a minimum cover to be met prior to approval.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
all - many thanks for your feedback. Seems both would be the overall answer; public as an add-on (where needed).
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Surely it would be the except rather than the rule for a business not to require SQ8ipublic liability cover. Quite hard to think when it wouldn't be need to be honest. Obvious but one to remember, employers liability is only required if there are employees, so single tradesperson or consultant wouldn't need it. Edited by user 23 December 2020 08:31:15(UTC)
| Reason: Typo
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Public Liability is not a legal requirement - but i do agree it would take a very brave person to run a company without it!
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Originally Posted by: AcornsConsult Surely it would be the except rather than the rule for a business not to require SQ8ipublic liability cover. Quite hard to think when it wouldn't be need to be honest. Obvious but one to remember, employers liability is only required if there are employees, so single tradesperson or consultant wouldn't need it.
I'm also sure that if you have employees and they are close family members you do. not require employers liability either.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Originally Posted by: Mark-W Originally Posted by: AcornsConsult Surely it would be the except rather than the rule for a business not to require SQ8ipublic liability cover. Quite hard to think when it wouldn't be need to be honest. Obvious but one to remember, employers liability is only required if there are employees, so single tradesperson or consultant wouldn't need it. I'm also sure that if you have employees and they are close family members you do. not require employers liability either. yep, they all have to be close - there is a list of course and it can't be a limited company.
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.