Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
susan safety  
#1 Posted : 29 April 2021 11:59:59(UTC)
Rank: New forum user
susan safety

When inspecting a system type scaffold, such as cuplock.  What ratio of fittings should be checked to ensure the inspection is sufficient?

peter gotch  
#2 Posted : 29 April 2021 14:33:30(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
peter gotch

Hi Susan

I don't think there is any specific recommendation as to the answer to your question!

But if you stand away from the scaffold, e.g. on the other side of a road, you should be able to see whether all the standards are vertical and all the ledgers are horizontal - if they look wrong, they are. Your eyesight can tell without any equipment whether things are within tolerance as regards verticality and horizontality.

If you take the first of the common systems to be mass marketed in the UK, i.e. Kwikstage, then each connection is dependent on its "banana" and "wedge". If the banana doesn't sit properly in the wedge, then the tube is unlikely to look right from a distance. SImilar principles apply to Cuplok or the more sophisticated systems that subsequently came on the market.

Rather than concentrate on this aspect, I would give closer attention to any components that are tube and fitting, e.g. to fill in gaps where a system scaffold is erected alongside a structure which is not completely straight, e.g. at oriel windows on a building + whether the footings, ties and bracing are in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions.

....and since system scaffolds are easier to erect (and thence sometimes put up by people who have not had full scaffolder training), I would be putting close attention to checking that the recommended proportion of ties have been subject to pull out tests.

If you were talking about tube and fitting scaffolds I would add overhanging boards or the lack of intermediate transoms but this is less of an issue with systems as the boards fit neatly within the system. Always assumes that the system is built with its proprietary units!!

P

Users browsing this topic
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.