Rank: Super forum user
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Hi Roundtuit Not entirely convinced by the narrative, but I think that an inquest is an appropriate decision, in the absence of signs of a public inquiry (on the broader issue of how the pandemic has been managed) being imminent. ...and to be fair to the DM (somewhat reluctantly!) it wasn't two other workers on public transport in the whole of London, but two others at Victoria.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Not sure what PPE would have prevented this. Given that face coverings are not supposed to protect the wearer, what exactly is being proposed? What PPE would have prevented this person from contracting COVID-19, even if we assume they did contract it at work? Should they have been supplied with a full hazmat suit? Is that reasonable?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Dont you just love Coroner's at times! The advice we have all been given unless working in lab or care situation is that PPE is not needed. If this is upheld then do we have to provide FFP2/3 masks for anyone who may be "spat at" during thier work activity? So anyone working with the public. And we would not be talking just about COVID but any virul disease. As i have said from day 1 this should be a public health situation not a H&S situation
|
1 user thanked HSSnail for this useful post.
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.