Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
jess.little1990  
#1 Posted : 05 October 2021 09:38:39(UTC)
Rank: New forum user
jess.little1990

Hi all, this maybe a stupid question but where do we stand if we were to work fom home permanently? At what point do employers responsibilities stop? For example, if an employee tripped over their cat while working from home, where do we stand? Are we responsible for conductign home safety visits or are photos and questionnaires & risk assessments suitable and sufficient?

HSSnail  
#2 Posted : 05 October 2021 11:36:22(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
HSSnail

My understanding is you are responsible for the work activity - so any equipment you supply must be OK, and the person must be able to carry out the work activity safely. That does not mean that you are responsible for the fabrick or maintance  of the home - or for them falling over the cat (unless you happen to be a pet bourding establishment) as thats not part of the work activity. Bit like them tripping over thier own shoelace in the office.

Here is the HSE's stance

https://www.hse.gov.uk/toolbox/workers/home.htm?utm_source=hse.gov.uk&utm_medium=refferal&utm_campaign=coronavirus&utm_term=home_workers&utm_content=home-page-popular

You do read horror stories in the press - like the lady who sued McDonalds when she slipped on coka a cola on the floor - which she had just thrown at her boyfriend. But most of these silly claims get thrown out on appeal - just not good news so they dont report that!

 

thanks 1 user thanked HSSnail for this useful post.
jess.little1990 on 12/10/2021(UTC)
A Kurdziel  
#3 Posted : 05 October 2021 12:10:27(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
A Kurdziel

What most tabloids miss out that ANYBODY  can use for ANYTHING. It does not follow that these cases get anywhere let alone an appeal. Often, they get dismissed 10 minutes  after  they start but our esteemed journalist don’t mention that They just like to run stories about other people stupidity: never the stupidity of  their readers, just other papers’ readers. Of course the danger is that  people believe this rubbish and when the government decides to make it more difficult for ordinary people to go to court this is the sort of thing they quote, but then what to expect from a government that is lead by someone who started  his career writing made up stories in the Telegraph about EU regulations on bananas.  

thanks 1 user thanked A Kurdziel for this useful post.
peter gotch on 05/10/2021(UTC)
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.