Rank: Forum user
|
Hello, Im looking for some advice- Last stop saloon. I have a few employees who couldn't undertake face fit testing due to:
A) Medical reasons, Skin conition- HR Involved to refer them to Employee Assistance. B) Refused to shave off beard- Non religious reason.
We have two types of fitted face masks and a spray shop helment, powered assisted for the sprayers.
We already purchase these, and these are what are fitted to the lads. Its taken 2 masks to get everyones face shapes fitted to something, so not without trying.
Anyway my query is regards the guys who refuse to shave their beards, because its fashionable. These guys are not youngesters, So not as easy to persuade. The face fit tester i had in, said he remembered some internet advice where it said you can ask the employee to purchase their hood, because the choice of growing a beard was after they were employed. Does anyone remember this?
I get you can remove them from the task, But these guys are joiners. So not as easy
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
I think you would be on very sticky ground if you tried to get workers to pay for their PPE. The simplest solution is just to buy them the hoods. It will pay for itself in the time and trouble you save, not to mention the protection of their health.
|
1 user thanked Kate for this useful post.
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
I'd go further than Kate. You can't make them or even ask them to pay for hoods. That would be a breach of Section 9 of HSWA. Whoever told you could 'ask' them to buy their own hoods simply does not understand the requirements or principles of the HSWA or the PPE Regs. Given they were supposed to be providing a H&S service, I find this quite worrying! You can't force your staff to shave, or even be clean-shaven at work. It is the employer's legal duty to find and provide suitable PPE for their employees, not for employees to have to make changes to themselves to make the employer's preferred PPE suitable. Tony.
|
6 users thanked antbruce001 for this useful post.
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Taking it one stage further what actions have been put in place to eliminate the hazard without recourse to the last resort in the hierarchy of PPE? TBH I would prefer something that keeps possible contamination away from my eyes, skin & hair rather than something that just protects my airways.
If you consider these additional controls to fully protect the workers then maybe face fit testing for RPE is doing them a diservice by not providing hoods.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Taking it one stage further what actions have been put in place to eliminate the hazard without recourse to the last resort in the hierarchy of PPE? TBH I would prefer something that keeps possible contamination away from my eyes, skin & hair rather than something that just protects my airways.
If you consider these additional controls to fully protect the workers then maybe face fit testing for RPE is doing them a diservice by not providing hoods.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
Originally Posted by: Kate I think you would be on very sticky ground if you tried to get workers to pay for their PPE. The simplest solution is just to buy them the hoods. It will pay for itself in the time and trouble you save, not to mention the protection of their health.
Not as simple to get them hoods, they're joiners. Hoods restrict their vision, the operatives work head down. Their joinery isnt in their eye line all the time when working on furniture for example.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
On tool extraction / Extraction benches - more than one way to skin the proverbial
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
On tool extraction / Extraction benches - more than one way to skin the proverbial
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
Originally Posted by: Roundtuit Taking it one stage further what actions have been put in place to eliminate the hazard without recourse to the last resort in the hierarchy of PPE? TBH I would prefer something that keeps possible contamination away from my eyes, skin & hair rather than something that just protects my airways.
If you consider these additional controls to fully protect the workers then maybe face fit testing for RPE is doing them a diservice by not providing hoods.
We have a huge Dust extraction system which is linked to all machines apart from their work benches. The work benches aren't attached, as theyre not positioned in a way we could get Extraction hoses to them. (Imagine a big old work bench x12 in the middle of the workshop) Machinery all around the parimeter of the building. The RPE is for when they fine sanding down, as the furniture they build isn't all machined finished, has to be built by hand afterwards.
Maybe its a case of moving the work benches and attaching dust extraction to them all.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
Thanks for the responses, Originally I was trying to locate the old information which said after providing types of masks etc, Or see if anyone else remembers it.
Thanks for your responses
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
|
2 users thanked Roundtuit for this useful post.
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
|
2 users thanked Roundtuit for this useful post.
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Hi cerisa Without reading all the links that Roundtuit has so helpfully highlighted.... Many years ago there was research done that indicates that "clean shaven" policies are of limited value. Many workers would need to shave again during shift to maintain their face fit. However, now that you clarified the processes, I think you might want to look at how much dust is being generated in the breathing zone at the individual's worker's own personal station. IFF they are doing hand sanding (particularly if not with a powered sander) of bespoke furniture (at this stage largely to be put together in ye old fashioned way) then possibly the dust levels emitted are such as to expose the workers to levels that are so far below the Work Exposure Limits as to not justify much in the way of precautions - i.e. enforcing the use of RPE might not be reasonably practicable, enforcing a "clean shaven" policy even less so.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
Most handtools now, even small handheld sanders now come with a dust extraction connection for a vacuum type hoover hose, or have their own integrated dust bag attachment available. What I had to do where I am is instruct purchasing to purchase any dust extraction accessory whenever they purchase a tool. The guys wood , (see what I did there), just order a Sander etc, and not think about adding the associated dust control accessory at the same time).
Larger bench mounted machines certainly come with extraction connections of the hoover type
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Pirelli, that playne on words, was soft wood pineful.
Edited by user 05 October 2022 10:07:24(UTC)
| Reason: Typo
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
Just wondering has anyone used the hoods and how were they received? Our works are very transient and additionally we are exposed to dust created by others. I would be concerned that I pushed management to buy them only to find they were used no more regularly/correctly than the mask style protection is. They would have to be carried around, kept clean etc.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
Originally Posted by: emm.plant@me.com Just wondering has anyone used the hoods and how were they received?
We had to use them temporarily in our workplace after our LEV failed. They were very disliked and some employees decided to shave instead of putting up with the hoods for 2 weeks. Main complaints were the hood being too hot and always getting in the way.
Best of luck
Mathew
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
I've found hoods to be far more popular among users than face-fitting respirators. They are considered more comfortable because the positive pressure means you aren't struggling to breathe through a filter.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
Will put my tin hat on for this reply..... PPE needs to be supplied free of charge so you can’t ask them to buy their own. However, I was always under the impression that certain jobs you can write it into the employment contract that they are clean shaven if it’s that important, I.e. pilots as they need to land the plane in low oxygen etc.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Me too, as long as the requirement to be clean shaven is reasonable. In the case of an airline pilot, it might even be written into flying regulations. The problem is how do you police this? If you have largeish workforce it might be difficult to ensure that they all comply particularly if they are “trades” where the idea of a dress code and standard of appearance are quite alien. Hoods are better not least because you can wear them for a whole shift while close fitting negative pressure masks can’t be worn for more than an hour or two. The emphasis, far as the HSE is concerned, is to look at alternatives including LEV and on tool extraction.
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.