Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Chuck the Puck  
#1 Posted : 25 January 2023 14:40:48(UTC)
Rank: New forum user
Chuck the Puck

Hello

Newcomer seeking advice.

Our company (precision engineering) has embarked on a programme of health surveillance, specifically respiratory and skin testing from exposure to metalworking fluids.

We are imminently to enter into a relationship with an Occupational Health provider. The provider in question has set the frequency of recall for new employees at commencement of employment/3month/6 month & annnual.

Can anyone tell me if this frequency is simply advisory on the part of the OH provider? I cannot unearth any reference to such a frequency of recall for respiratory testing from HSE publications. I can appreciate the commencement of employment testing in order to establish baseline functioning, but the addition of 3 and 6 month repeat testing would be a costly undertaking.

In 2022, the first round of annual testing undertaken across approx 35 employees in like for like roles found no evidence of work related compromise in lung function. Might such evidence act as justification for eliminating the three and six month intervals?

A simple symptoms questionnaire will also be circulated for completion, and could arguably inform actions and decision making around referral onwards, should an employee report negative symptoms.

Opinions please...

Kind regards

peter gotch  
#2 Posted : 25 January 2023 17:29:23(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
peter gotch

Hi Chuck the Puck

Like so many things this is down to what is reasonably practicable in all the circumstances.

So, perhaps ask the OH provider why their recommendation is as it is.

May be they do such work with lots of companies using metal working fluids and have good reason to think that for the time being 3 and 6 monthly reviews are sensible.

You could even get somebody else to make proposals and give a quote. 

As with any selection of an outside provider it is about getting confidence that they know what they are talking about and not upping the specification without good reason.

thanks 1 user thanked peter gotch for this useful post.
Chuck the Puck on 26/01/2023(UTC)
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.