Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Melanie Harrison
A number of Centre Managers are now asking for Water Risk Assessments for Retail Stores. Does anyone have any experience regarding this?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Jonathan Breeze
Melanie,
Can I ask what the context of the question is?
Is it business continuity risk following a flood event, or a COSHH Risk Assessment etc...
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Melanie Harrison
They are asking about how water is plumbed in the staff rooms apparently because of the risk of legionella bacteria etc.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Peter Longworth
If that is the case your risk assessment will need to look at the likely temperature of the water (20C to 45C is the range in which legionella is active), the possibility of an aerosol being generated that could be inhaled, the cleaning of fixtures and fittings to minimise rust or other contaminants that might be nutrients for legionella. You will need to look at areas where water can stagnate such as rarely used fittings or deadlegs, will the water need some sort of treatment (not very likely if it is mains water that is regularly used). You will need also to consider who could be exposed eg maintenace staff, shop assistants, customers etc.
Having said all this, if the water is mains water that is regularly used the risk of providing a breeding ground for legionella will be quite small I would have thought.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By steve e ashton
Melanie:
Are you sure the concern is being raised in relation to legionellae -and not 'general' bacteria?. Legionellae should only really be an issue in places where water is aerosolised - turned to droplets/mist e.g. in showers / cooling towers etc.
A far more common concern is simply whether the water at the tap in the sink in the staff room is 'potable' (i.e. drinkable)
If this is the concern, then the response could be to trace the plumbing, and all cold taps fed direct from the mains can be labelled 'drinking water' - and all cold taps fed with water from tanked storage in the roof should be labelled 'not drinking water'.
Water from the mains can (normally) be assumed to be safe to drink. Water from tanked storage is of uncertain quality, may have any amount of any number of unknown organisms... It may be fit for bathing, laundry, wc flushing etc - but not for drinking (even after boiling.....).
In any 'new' commercial building, you may be able to get the information from the 'CDM H&S File'. The alternative is to have a plumber trace all your pipes or do a pressure test (which may or may not be conclusive....)
Bottom line - if there is a dead rat in your header tank, and someone suffers illness as a result of drinking the water... what are you going to say?
Hope this may help.
Steve
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Salus
Another one for Clarkson, do you think a national water service provider does not carry out checks to their supply.It comes from the same place as your household tap water
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Melanie Harrison
Thank you for the feeback - it is very helpful -
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By garyh
Don't you know that water is DANGEROUS? You can drown in it. In solid form it can crush you or pierce you (known as "icicles"). Large amounts can damage buildings. Excessive ingestion can kill you. Inadequate ingestion can kill you. Hot water causes burns. Exspoure to cold water causes hypothermia.
A STUDY SHOWED THAT 100% OF DEAD PEOPLE HAD IT IN THEIR BODIES!
(This shows how easy it is to spin information by misusing "facts")!
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Robert K Lewis
100% of the dead people had also previously been alive! Ergo the cause of death is life.
Or - If you don't live you don't die
Or - If you live you will die
It is a happy world of statistics isn't it.
On a more serious note the supply of non-potable water to welfare areas is a real problem as most people assume the cold supply is always from the mains, it is a thing called Perceptual Set and we need to make any deviation abundantly clear. In a regularly used welfare area the use of the taps is likely to obviate the growth of bacteria in the lines/tap heads but do look out for taps not used on a regular basis or for dead leg lines.
Bob
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Andrew Tudor
Don't forget the Water Supply (Water Fittings) Regulations 1999. You have a legal duty to protect against backflow and contaminating the mains water supply.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Tony Brunskill
Salus,
This may be one for Clarkeson but are you aware that none potable water is supplied to a number of taps in the workplace. Often as a result of the use of holding tanks that are contaminated. Drinking water shuold be direct to the tap from the rising main in most cases.
Oh and utility companies do get it wrong!! I recall an incident where they introduced sodium thiosulphate to the supply uetralising the residual chlorine (Available Free Chlorine) intended to deal with contamination after treatment.
Tony
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By anon1234
Bob,
I must disagree with you analysis of the available data.
More than half the people that have ever lived are still alive today - therefore it does not go that just because you are alive you will definetely die. Statistics prove this ;}
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Salus
exactly Tony, it is not the water that is the problem it is mechanics of storage and supply.
If a company has identified a significant risk of an employee or other contracting legionella (after they have ID how it is formed and transmitted)then that company should put in a maintenance policy to ensure the disease is prevented by recognised cleaning procedures
I recall that 1 incident as well, but it was of human error,where their procedures were at fault.
You cannot control everything, there is always a risk, you have to look at the problem then put in resonable and practicle control measures.
Petrol is highly flammable but that does not stop people from filling up
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Robert K Lewis
On an empirical basis I assert my view as correct. I have yet to find a person who has not physically, or will not, die. Living is the only known causal factor for death. The mechanisms for the actual dying process may be different but if you do not live you will not die.
Alternatively can you point me to a dead person who has never had life of any form?
Bob :-)
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.