Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 03 July 2006 11:18:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Is Kismet This morning an NHS safety officer has visited one of our site where kitchen cupboards are being fitted. He has ordered three employees off site because they are wearing shorts. The temperature where they are (were) working was 31 degrees. When, oh when, is our profession going to see the light.
Admin  
#2 Posted : 03 July 2006 11:43:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By JAI Totally agree with you we have a large construction site, where my lads only wear flip flops, shorts and hanky for a hat as it is far to hot for them to wear the normal gear Your men should have questioned the decision of the safety officer allowing him to explain his reasons for the rash decision his time would have been spent looking at the bigger risk from heat exposure
Admin  
#3 Posted : 03 July 2006 12:18:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Philby' There again, what exactly were they doing? I spent some time in the motor trade, 14 years as a electrical diagnostition, and we used to cut off our overall sleeves and cut the legs off just below the knee, still wwith the safety boots!...its amazing where hot swarf, melted plastic and the occaisional brush with a recently used and, therfore, a very hot drill bit, gains access! I for one, still have a burn scar on my scrotom. I'd check the circumstances first, then act/react Philby'
Admin  
#4 Posted : 03 July 2006 12:37:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Mark Bywater JAI, I think you've got to do a risk assessment and decide whether the greater risk comes from dropping something on your head or your foot, or from getting heat stroke etc. I can just hear the wife and family of some poor guy on your site now saying "Why did he die from a brick falling on his head?" and your response being "Well to be honest luv it was too hot to wear a hard hat!" The HSE would be all over you like a rash...and you know it. Personally though, I think you're winding us up here...flip flops as opposed to proper safety boots? Surely not! Mark
Admin  
#5 Posted : 03 July 2006 12:54:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By garyh I have a degree of sympathy with the guy who made the decision. You either have standards, or you don't. (However work environment surely comes into the RA for this job - do they really need to be covered up?) Anyone ever seen the "Rememeber Charlie" video? I paraphrase......"If you think wearing overalls in the hot weather is uncomfortable..........try being burned on 60% of your body". I had to laugh at this one; consider my boys. They work in a molten metal environment, erecting scaffolds. So.........we require............Overalls. Molten metal suits on top. Harness. Twin lanyards. Molten metal boots. Safety specs. CO monitor. Gloves. All in a very hot environment! So no sympathy for your shorts wearing guys!
Admin  
#6 Posted : 03 July 2006 12:54:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Is Kismet They were fitting kitchens.
Admin  
#7 Posted : 03 July 2006 13:09:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Patrick Burns CMIOSH - SpDipEM - MIQA I would have thought that there was in place a current generic risk assessment for fitting such kitchens. A specific site assessment would then be done detailing all relevant safety precautions, like isolation of electrical supplies etc etc. The safe system of work would also detail the requirements for PPE to mitigate against residual risk. This would be the first starting point of the debate. H&S Officer asks for risk assessment, reviews the detail, checks compliance of the fitters with it and then makes a decision. If no risk assessment has been provided then prohibit the work until the assessment has been supplied for review. Fitting kitchens involves mains electricity, power drills, jig saws and other portable tools. depending upon the size of the kitchen there may also be manual handling issues, noise dust etc, I would suggest that before one goes to town on the poor guy doing what is his/her job people look at the bigger picture. That's what happens when it all goes wrong and someone is seriously hurt and given some of the hazards I have referred to above there is a potential risk present.
Admin  
#8 Posted : 03 July 2006 13:25:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Is Kismet Could someone come up with a scenario where wearing shorts whilst fitting kitchen units is a significant risk. I'd prefer we stuck to the issue/scenario of wearing shorts whilst fitting kitchen units please, if that is possible. Thank you.
Admin  
#9 Posted : 03 July 2006 13:30:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By J Knight Hi Folks, While I have some sympathy with the more thorough responses, such as Patrick's, I do find it hard to envisage bare legs as a dreadful risk in fitting kitchen units. Is Kismet; were they plumbing? Or wiring? I'd guess from the tone of your last post they weren't, in fact you make it sound like they were just screwing flat packed or in any event pre-formed bits of conti and wood into place. If that's all they were doing, then I can see your point, John
Admin  
#10 Posted : 03 July 2006 13:44:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Peter Moran There should be some company policy that exists regarding the wearing of shorts taking into account the risks involved. Is there a policy stating the clothing that should be worn during working time in addition to PPE? On most sites in the construction industry shorts are not allowed especially road surfacing for obvious reasons....however this is often relaxed this for certain delivery/collection drivers not actually alighting from their vehicles at any time during working especially in hot weather. The first action would be to reduce the temperature for the guys working which would obviate the desire on their part to minimise their clothing. This rarely happens of course as it often involves spending money heaven forbid!! I see postmen wearing shorts in hot weather so presumably a risk assessment has been done cover the risk of injury from householder's dogs etc so why not for a moderate task in a kitchen?
Admin  
#11 Posted : 03 July 2006 13:47:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Is Kismet They were fitting kitchen units only. Thank goodness for the last two responses.
Admin  
#12 Posted : 03 July 2006 14:30:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By John Webster Had the fitters been female and wearing skirts, would he have made the same decision?
Admin  
#13 Posted : 03 July 2006 15:06:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Glyn Atkinson If I were doing the same job at home, (no that wasn't a dream, I just HAVE done the same job at home,) I still wear safety trainers if only for stubbing of toes and manual handling problems. Not a pretty sight but no top and just some shorts with tool pockets - perfectly acceptable to my mind and no reason to think of any higher protection inside a kitchen. Goggles for drilling out sink apertures, and also a dust mask? Now if other trades are working at height or with scaffolds directly outside this kitchen, on a typical housing estate new build site, then I may think again.
Admin  
#14 Posted : 03 July 2006 15:11:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Philby' Is Kismet, I dont think any of the posts diagreeing with you were being intentionally antagonistic, its just your original posting didn't make it clear as to the extent of the activities. I think most posts were reasonable in assuming that kitchen fitting can and does involve electrical, plumbing (water & gas), chemical, and sharps hazards, and that, although the cupboard carcas builders were not involved in that, there could have been others in the vacinity that were. I'm sorry you feel agreived, but you asked and we gave.... Philby'
Admin  
#15 Posted : 03 July 2006 15:31:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Is Kismet I wasn't aware of being aggrieved, but I would suggest you reread the original post. I'd say the word 'surprised' was more appropriate, that wearing short would appear to need method statements, risk assessment, input from Uncle Tom C...... etc. You won't mind if I stick by my original comment about over enthusiasm?
Admin  
#16 Posted : 03 July 2006 16:21:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By jackdaw We had some workmen working in our offices. Amongst other things the work included some electrical work and plumbing - and yes they were wearing shorts and t-shirts. I can't recall whether their risk assessment mentioned wearing shorts or not. I watched them for a short time, thought about hazards and risks, and thought "looks okay to me", and left them to it. Am I too laid back about these things? Seems to me that some people must have thousands of written risk assessments, and site rules covering every conceivable eventuality. As we don't appear to have any more accidents than other similar companies, we are either just lucky or many risk assessments are done simply as a paperwork exercise. Getting back to the original thread, it does seem over enthusiastic to me to send them off site for wearing shorts. Maybe we should be a bit more pragmatic about situations that arise.
Admin  
#17 Posted : 03 July 2006 16:38:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By John Battye nobody seems to have tackled the issue of working in hot environments. How about taking steps to reduce the temperature, befoire removing protection given by PPE
Admin  
#18 Posted : 03 July 2006 16:58:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By jackdaw I don't think the issue was about removing PPE, it was about having uncovered legs by wearing shorts. When I said that I think maybe people should be more pragmatic, the sort of thing I meant was - workmen are fitting kitchen units; its very hot; realistically nobody will pay for air con units; workmen wear shorts to keep a bit cooler - is this a problem? If yes, why is it? Even if site rules say shorts can't be worn why can't this particular job be looked at and an exception made? Surely it is part of a safety professionals job to be able to assess situations and make appropriate decisions - simply sticking to rules rigidly doesn't seem appropriate to me. Or again, am I too laid back about these things?
Admin  
#19 Posted : 03 July 2006 17:01:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Gary IMD(UK) And we then wonder why we get a bad name! And before people start e.mailing and leaving messages saying, 'Gary, I think you're missing the point here, we need to cover every eventuality'... please refer to the handbook of Common Sense! Yes, adhere to the reg's but each and every case on its merits, surely! Take care! I'm now off to have a BBQ! But please, no-one worry, I have spent all day drawing up my risk assessment, method statement, hot works permit and have interrogated everyone to turn up in flame-retardent suits, just incase an ember becomes airborne!
Admin  
#20 Posted : 03 July 2006 19:35:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Cathy Ricketts Poor guys - let them wear their shorts - my other half works a gas fitter/plumber both him and my son wear work shorts - they are very smart and worn with polo shirts look very professional. They have sourced some knee pads that they can wear with them to protect their knees, they have safety boots/trainers where required - the risk would be higher if they were too hot in the environment they were working in and failed to give the job their 100% attention - they get lots of complimentary remarks about their legs too (which they thoroughly enjoy)!!!!
Admin  
#21 Posted : 03 July 2006 19:43:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By JayJay Is Kismet when the NHS safety officer turned up did he ask them to leave site straight away or did he look at their M/S & R/A first ? We Safety officers all know how hard it is to please everybody on site, especially when you allow some contractors to wear shorts and not others ! You get the old chestnut of 'well he's not wearing them so why should i ?' I agree you have to look at the task and make sensible decisions on your findings, but when the contractors finished their task of installing kitchens, would they have put long trousers on to leave site assuming they have a distance to go and not be affected by other hazards on site ? I know it sounds a hard decision but did he explain himself fully on his decision ?
Admin  
#22 Posted : 03 July 2006 20:48:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Denver Chalmers It is as usual down to suitable and sufficient risk assessment remember that the defined meaning relates to risks NOT present in every day life. Even if we asume the guys involved were only screwing together and fitting a basic kitchen it is forseeable that some manual handling is involved in positioning worktops and units etc therefore leg covering or overalls although strictly speaking not PPE may reduce the severity of injury caused by scrapes drops scuffs etc. Good manual handling technique often requires getting close to the load and making contact with the items being handled. I have investigated manual handling injuries caused by a combination of factors including someone holding a load at arms legth because they had changed into their glad rags and literally minutes before they were to leave a package was delivered that had to be put on a shelf, failure to keep the load close to the body caused a back injury. I can understand why in some circumstances it may be acceptable to take a pragmatic view of certain situations and whilst I am all for portreying the profession in a good light I can see circumstances where shorts are not appropriate workwear for kitchen fitting. Our role in the workplace is to prevent injury and often that involves saving people from themselves. Look at the whole scenario from the NHS guys perspective he may have been involved in investigating accidents where the severity of injury could have been lessened by a simple cloth covering and he was giving these guys the benefit of someone elses harsh lesson.
Admin  
#23 Posted : 03 July 2006 21:03:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Kieran J Duignan Kismet Is the purpose of your posting is to establish that the incident provides a platform for campaigning for programmes of behavioural safety management in the NHS? Or to what extent is your intention to simply moan and groan? I venture to hope you may now choose to educate the Safety Officer of the more cost-effective options available to him and you.
Admin  
#24 Posted : 04 July 2006 07:40:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Ron Young Spot on Gary, what a bunch of anoraks we are! I really despair about those PR negatives and our ability to shoot ourselves in the foot by being so bloody minded and holier than thou all the time. Chill out
Admin  
#25 Posted : 04 July 2006 09:46:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By 9-Ship Even if doing plumbing work, why are some people assuming 'hot work' was involved? Plumbing does not always mean soldering/brazing was taking place. Indeed for the DIY market, I would have thought manufactuers will avoid such types of joints, as being perceived as being too difficult for DIYers. Please don't jump on my back if you are a competent DIYer!! Many plumbing joints are now either plastic pipes/fitting - hand tight joints. Or copper compression joints, requiring simply tighting with spanners etc. So having taken away the risk of hot work - would it be such a disaster to get wet legs!! The water should be shut off anyway. Really can't see any great argument between shorts and long trousers when using basic hand tools - if you slip with a screwdriver or indeed power tool/jigsaw, I really don't think long trousers would make any difference to the injury. In my view, the main issue is one of presentation - a smartly turned out plumber wearing a company provided shirt and trouser + logo etc, looks more professional than a guy in shorts and tee shirt. This particular point is not a H&S issue. Seems to me this is heading into the 'bonkers conkers' direction.
Admin  
#26 Posted : 07 July 2006 16:23:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Ali Was it his/her personal preference or were they acting on company policy ? If there is no policy on this, you may be able to appeal against their decision. Ali Moderate Safety Adviser
Admin  
#27 Posted : 07 July 2006 16:39:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Gilles27 We are a Local Authority and our housing works operatives are allowed to wear shorts (even the ones who use sharp pointy things). It upsets the bin men though... Risk assessment? Whats that then?
Admin  
#28 Posted : 15 August 2006 09:19:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Antony McManus Judging by a lot of the previous responses it sounds like a lot of people are missing the point in a big way. It sounds like the safety officer who said this was the type who said something and then wouldn't admit that he/she was wrong. Lets be honest..,.we've all come across them and it is these people who get the industry a bad name. But, lets look at the big picture here....the guy was wearing shorts.... hardly high risk or life threatening is it... Is it just me or are people taking things too far.... answers on a postcard to the usual address... ony Mc
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.