IOSH forums home
»
Our public forums
»
OSH discussion forum
»
Ewan says that Health and Safety is out of control...
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Brigham What's happened to this post? Am I missing something?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Paul Duell It's vanished!
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By James Perry Those Jedis and their mind tricks eh?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Mark W Dont know where the post went but my response....
If Mr McGregor appears so happy to live life risk-free then I wonder if in the future he will no longer be using stunt doubles in his movies?
He has used stunt doubles in the past in such films as Star Wars and The Island and rather ironically in Stormbreaker when he used a stunt man to ride a motorcycle for him!
So it would appear that in reality Mr McGregor is not always so keen in taking all the risks himself in his own workplace!
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Brigham I had just posted a response when the thread was removed but as I've not quoted from other sites, here's my response again
Everyone no matter what their persuasion is, is entitled to an opinion. I actually agree with Ewan on several of his comments, especially this nanny state we live in when we literally have to request to breath by ourselves. And yes, I do think we have too many rules and regulations in place to allow us as adults to make reasoned choices without pillory. With the upsurge in safety related legislation, have we actually succeeded in reducing accidents in proportion? I don't think so but that is MY opinion... Does anyone really think that the plethora of H&S legislation makes their job easier? In reflection, it helps to make it a damn sight harder and it is on this issue that the bonkers, conkers brigade wipe the floor with us
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By R Joe I'm sure that Ewan's widow would shrug sympathetically had he been incinerated whilst chin wagging to the garage attendant smoking as he filled his bike up in Africa. There's absolutely no way that her solicitor would have contacted the BBC to ask for their risk assessment prior to suing for negligence.................
On a more serious note, we are too risk averse at the expense of the things that are a real danger and shifting the balance of individual responsibility too far away from the individual - Ewan, with full knowledge of the risks, should be free to ride without a helmet, no day time headlight, a T shirt and shorts, and drain his petrol tank whilst smoking - I personally don't, not because of the nanny state but because my experience (including the deaths of several acquaintances) tells me its somewhat risky to do so!
RJ
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By J Knight Sorry folks don't get the nanny state bit at all. I don't feel excessively constrained in anything I do or want to do, but perhaps that's because I'm a non-smoker who happens to feel that the Highway Code is a good way to regulate road traffic?
John
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Kite Mark The fact that Mr McGregor does not do is own stunts may not totally be down to him it would be in is contract that he has to use stunt doubles for insurance reasons,
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By andrew pickup I don't think the real issue here is the relation to health & safety, but more so the nanny state which we do currently live in and to which i would be inclined to agree with Ewan.
I am fully aware of the positive impact health & safety rules & regulations have on the general quality & sustenance of life, where previously these were lacking. However, does nobody else think that the general nanny state goes too far???
It gets to the point were we cant go anywhere without being watched, we cannot think for ourselves without being told what to think and our freedom of speech is only allowed if it fits in with certain political correctness. We are no longer a free country, but one where we are controlled on every aspect of what we do.
We are no longer allowed to discipline our own children in any way, shape or form (i am not advocating physical violence under any circumstances), but if you are honest, how many of us have done things when we were younger & got a clip round the ear, injured etc because of it? I bet you never made the same mistake again! We are no longer able to learn from our mistakes because every aspect of living is governed to the extreme.
As mentioned in a previous response, we shall be at the point were we have to request permission to breath!
The reduction of risks is of great value, until a certain point. Certain risks require to be taken in order to grow, mature, learn etc. If we lived in a totally risk free society we would never even get out of bed in a morning.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By J Knight Point of information; we can discipline our children and the government has ruled out a smacking ban. And could you explain which thoughts you are not allowed to think for fear of accusations of political incorrectness?
John
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By R Joe The problem with the so called nanny state, in my view, is not that it's restrictive (I don't feel restricted) but that it's understanding of risk is completely out of kilter. We (society) now have a specific set of WaH regs for a (relatively) small number of accidents that could have been controlled within existing legislation with better enforcement and where according to the public 'stepladders are now banned' (TOTALLY predictable response and fuel for the ‘elf and safety’ brigade) whereas day-in day-out people will be exposing themselves unwittingly to ACMs and REAL danger as a result of the DIY and property boom obsession but complete lack of focus on this, and there is a growing iceberg of HIV positive young people waiting to explode when the govt finally realises it has completely taken its eye off the ball in this area of REAL danger for the last 20 years.
RJ
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By andrew pickup John,
My point on the thinking of our own thoughts may be a bit cynical and are were not meant literally. Although the way the nanny state appears to move you never know what may happen in the future.
Political correctness is, however, i feel out of control and encroaches on the freedom of speech which we allegedly have. Im sure we could go tit-for-tat all day long over the intricacies of such a debate.
However we shall never get away from differing opinions.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Pete48 Please get a life. I meet a hundred real people with the same views every month, you will never change their approach to life. Their experiences may change them but you never will. If he doesn't want to live here, he can always leave and go live in Africa or wherever he feels the country is run in a manner he feels is more appropriate. Or better still, do something really positive about changing this country for the better instead of riding about on a bike pontificating for the popular press.
Ooh that feels better. Time for lunch.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By J Knight R Joe,
I agree with your points, actually. Nice to see some reflective ideas on this compicated matter.
Thing is, its all politics, innit? When we have an ellgedly left-wing government in power we get people complaining about nanny states (this goes back to before WWII as it happens); when we get right wing governments in we get lefties (like me) complaining about Police states (10,000 uniformed police on Campo Lane in Sheffield was quite a sight, believe me).
But on the whole my life is relatively free, and I wouldn't for a minute give it up for the 'risk-free' life Mr McGregor was extolling. I wonder, did he actually get off his bike and talk to people about the risks they are forced to take while earning their pay? I did, when I was in Africa, and on the whole I found that people are very aware of the danger, and would like some protection, thank you very much,
John
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Bob Shillabeer Just a little aside to all those who sem to opose the improvement in health and safety. Just imaging working for an employer who has such a disregard for H&S legislation that he does his own thing. What would be his position should an employee or anyone else be seriously injured or killed as a result of his actions. Would he be honest and say yes it was his fault and pay up the compensation and possibly go to jail? I think not because he will run straight for cover under the H&S legislation he so clearly dismisses as molly coddling.
Yes there may well be some areas where the law is somewhat OTT but this is being addressed with the help of the RR order legislation and yes it will take a long time. But, the HASAWA sets out a basis for managing the risk from such activities, in short it requires you to identify and assess the risks from any action undertaken while at work, etc and put in place ways of reducing the risk to as low as reasonably practicable.
Far from being out of control safety is only just becoming a controlled thing and that controll is very delecate because hwenever people tink the risk is under control is when it bites you.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Brigham Sorry Bob, not sure where you're going there. you mention bad employers ignoring the law, so in effect, for him/her the law might as well not be there. Then you speak of the law making a difference! Is it possible that our "higher" regard(?) for safety is more driven by higher moral standards and what is acceptable than being swamped with endless dictat from the EU, where in many of the places now in the EU, safety is a total joke. I'm not against a legal framework but it has to be a framework, not a complete build.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By J Knight Brigham,
Its not the EU you know; really the main thing the EU has done is the Management Regs, and all that did was make explicit the implied duty to assess risk which has been in UK law since HASAWA in 1974. Yes, I know that lots of bits of law have originated in EU directives (WAH, DSEAR etc etc), but by and large they have merely been particular variations on the themes set out in MHSW regs.
UK H&S law has a long and honourable history, and the fact that EU initiatives are implemented well here speaks volumes for that history. If other EU countries don't implement EU law well, doesn't that make a good argument for making the EU more responsive, democratic and giving it greater teeth? Oh I see, its a reason just to knock it instead, sorry,
John
|
|
|
|
IOSH forums home
»
Our public forums
»
OSH discussion forum
»
Ewan says that Health and Safety is out of control...
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.