Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 03 March 2006 23:41:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By snt Almost every adverts for H&S post stipulates NEBOSH. Is NEBOSH the only acceptable certificate? I need advice on this issues. Is anybod out there with Degree or Post Graduate Qualification? What has been your experience in the job market? I there anybody with T835 Integrated Health, Safety and Environmental Management? I owuld ike to know how you have fared in the job market.
Admin  
#2 Posted : 04 March 2006 18:07:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Keith E I did T835 via OU a few years back, as well as T862, and a couple of other courses ('Science Matters") I took the OU route to MIOSH/Grad IOSH, simply because I refused to pay the rip off prices of the DIploma etc etc. I have since gained Grad IOSH, would have been RSP by now if the membership rules hadn't changed for Chartered status etc (not just Tech SPs who feel p***** off about the membership changes etc of recent months!) I have found no problems having OU qualification recognised etc by employers and would recommend OU to anyone wanting to upgrade to Grad IOSH etc. Just gotta go through the silly CPD cycle now to get CMIOSH status etc - not that it will change my approach to the job etc - still the hoops you have to jump through to get the extra money etc - thats the only reason we all do it it - isn't it? Guess £45k a year isn't too bad, more than doubled my salary in the 10yrs I have been doing elf & safety.
Admin  
#3 Posted : 04 March 2006 18:19:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Charley Farley-Trelawney Keith Just a question; can a tech SP state Dip 1 osh after the name to establish dip status? It would seperate NGC from Dip one. CFT
Admin  
#4 Posted : 04 March 2006 19:13:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Keith E No idea
Admin  
#5 Posted : 04 March 2006 20:34:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Bill Fisher Charley Are you referring to NEBOSH Dip 1? If so I don't believe you can from a formal point of view. Bill
Admin  
#6 Posted : 04 March 2006 21:33:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By snt Thank you very much Keith, I pray OU and other routes candidates find you among the job panel, then they stand a chance. I attended interview sometime, the Senior Health and safety advisor was baffled when I mentioned MIOSH, and perplexed when I mentioned T835. All he was interested is my willingness to get NEBOSH General certificate. If a senior H&S officer is not conversant about the routes to qualification in their chosen profession, then I would then be able to make informed decision that hinges on their management capability. All qualification are valid and they all satisfied the requirement for IOSH membership. Employment should not be based on the so called popular route - NEBOSH, but on IOSH status. This trend is also evident in CDM as essential requirement for certain post. A construction engineer with PostGraduate route to MIOSH is put at a disadvantage simply for not having CDM certificate. T835 and other Postgraduate route cover CDM elements and other area such as environment, food safety, agricultural safety and other area such as pollution. It would be ideal if this issue is addressed as part of the CPD in form awareness for IOSH members.
Admin  
#7 Posted : 05 March 2006 10:09:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Charley Farley-Trelawney Yes Bill; I was in fact making reference to 'dip one'. I know its drifting off the post subject a bit but I just got to thinking that I am aware there is some animosity around from previous tech SP which if I am not mistaken will share the tech IOSH status with certificate holders that have signed up for CPD's. It just occurred to me that perhaps there was a justifiable way of differentiating the two qualifications, i.e. dip1 osh or tech dip, it may have been a way to show the dissimilarity; unless of course as per usual I have not read through the membership changes sufficiently! CFT
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.