Posted By John Webster
Firstly, let me refer you to the thread "Disabled Evacuation Procedures" posted by JOSEPH RAE on Monday, 05 November 2001, which, as we were about to embark on a programme of work to convert our headquarters building to conform with the 2004 requirements of DDA came as a timely shock.
The re-designers had planned for a stair lift to the first floor. When, in the light of the posting, I queried the evacuation arrangements (yes, and consultation with the H&S adviser is another issue) I was told the physically disabled would wait in a safe refuge for evacuation by the fire brigade!!
The project has now been re-assessed in light of the ACTUAL requirements of the DDA, not the often (ill-)PERCEIVED requirements.
With respect to Part III of the Act, we have managed to eliminate the need for the public to have access above the ground floor. Public meetings (formerly in the first floor Board Room)will now be held in a nearby, disabled friendly, facility. (As a bonus, the occasional rental works out cheaper than the stair lift).
A meeting/interview room will be available on the ground floor so that should a physically disabled person wish to meet with an employee on the upper floor, the employee can come down to them. This would also, of course, be available to able bodied visitors. These are permissible solutions under the Act.
With regard to employment provision, we have simply agreed that, should a physically disabled person be selected for a post, their office will located on the ground floor, and if this means a re-shuffle of some offices or departments, then so be it.
OK, it may be easier for us in a 2 storey office block than for those in multi-storey blocks without fire lifts, but we also have offices in a 3 storey listed building in a conservation area completely enclosed by a narrow street and surrounding, also listed buildings.
The DDA does not require that a disabled person have access to all parts of all buildings and premises. It requires that reasonable adjustments be made to ensure that they are not unjustifiably disadvantaged in employment and in access to goods, facilities and services provided by an organisation to the public. Sometimes we will have to be imaginative in finding alternative means to compliance with the Act.
John