Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 23 April 2002 09:27:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Maddy McMahon Hi Does anyone have any experience of packaging systems using MDI (isocyanate)based foam that they are prepared to share? I know that this stuff is a respiratory sensitiser but I am not certain on the health surveillance requirements. Thanks Maddy
Admin  
#2 Posted : 23 April 2002 10:15:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Paul Leadbetter Maddy I assume that you are referring to the two-pack foam systems where the components are mixed in the nozzle immediately before the foam is used to fill a package. If so, I have carried out personal monitoring in such a situation and found no airborne isocyanate. Even static samples taken immediately over the developing, warm foam found no isocyanate. Regards Paul
Admin  
#3 Posted : 24 April 2002 13:51:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jim Walker I have similar experiences to Paul. Basically it is a matter of keeping the equipment is good repair. Please contact me direct if you want detailed help. I am responsible for a number of different types of MDI foaming plant.
Admin  
#4 Posted : 24 April 2002 23:28:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Simon Ayee A few years back I investigated a RIDDOR reportable case of occupational asthma attributed to use of this type of packaging system. The suppliers carried out air monitoring (not personal monitoring) for short term exposure but I was not happy with the accuracy of the colorimetric results - had exposure been reduced to as far below MEL as reasonably practicable? More detailed sampling was carried out following an Improvement Notice (potentially requirng provision of LEV or repositioning of the equipment). This monitoring indicated extremely low levels of isocyantes (far below MEL) so no further action was taken except requiring health surveilance for those persons using/near equipment.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.