Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 21 August 2003 22:30:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Richard Webber Did I hear the news correctly this evening ? Did they tell us that a Football stadium was being developed close to a chemical plant which produces/utilizes significant quantities of ........something (Chlorine ?). And that as a result the Club has been obliged to design chemical shelters within the football ground in case of accidental release ?. It sounds implausible, but could be an interesting subject for a design risk assessment exercise ! "Planning supervision, Anyone?" Richard
Admin  
#2 Posted : 22 August 2003 08:41:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Smurfer About ten years ago i was involved in a study modeling the dispersion of an accidental ethylene oxide release from a plant adjacent to a proposed football stadium. The stadium had open corners and wwe reckoned this was conducive to lettin gthe chemical roll into the ground, slowly filling the stadium with toxic gas. The main recommendation was to fill in the corners - didn't happen until five years after the ground was built!
Admin  
#3 Posted : 22 August 2003 15:19:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Andy Petrie Would that be the Riverside stadium perchance? There is no way that a stadium can provide chemical shelters for 30,000+. You simply have to rely on the fact that the chemical works is managed correctly (i.e. COMAH etc.) With regards to your example, a release from the nearby chemical works is going to be of such a magnitude that 'filling in the corners' would provide little, if any protection.
Admin  
#4 Posted : 22 August 2003 15:35:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Stewart Dean Think the ground in question is the TRAINING ground that Everton FC are proposing to build. There will not be as great a crowd present there than would be at Goodison Pk for their competitive games.
Admin  
#5 Posted : 22 August 2003 16:18:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Mark J. Jones I hope I am allowed a rather flippant response on a Friday afternoon: Crowds will not be a significant issue if it involves West Ham United! The changing room would be an ideal chemical shelter.
Admin  
#6 Posted : 22 August 2003 16:49:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Nick House Hmm. Chemical plant next to Everton's training ground. Perhaps chemical saturation may make them play better??
Admin  
#7 Posted : 25 August 2003 15:35:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Garry Campbell Could be the new stadium currently being built by Falkirk Football Club, between Falkirk and Grangemouth. Apparently, the site of the new stadium is in the "blast zone" of Avecia? Sygenta? Zeneca? or whatever they call the old ICI now. Really has not been a good year for Falkirk FC, first they are refused entry to the Scottish Premier League because they do not have a 10,000 all seater stadium and then it is decided to build the new stadium in an area which is likely to be taken out if something goes wrong at Avecia? Syng... etc....etc...
Admin  
#8 Posted : 25 August 2003 19:23:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Richard Webber Would it be a case of ".....they think its all over..........IT IS NOW !" ? How are the risks balanced in this type of commercial development ? Does the designer have to consider the prohibitive cost of viable land within the risk assessment? Any thoughts?
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.