Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 13 August 2004 12:05:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Tony O'Keefe Good Day Learned Folks, Having recently embarked on a series of asbestos surveys within the company I work for, I have started to label up areas where asbstos was found to be present. After one day the scare mongering has began, I try to explain the reason why the company is doing this, and the likelyhood of anyone in the past actually being affected. Though a couple of labourers have just visited me voicing their concerns, saying that they have sometime worked in some of the areas that had been identified as having ACM's and performed the tasks that could release fibres in to the air. My question is which would be the best way forward with regard to setting these employees mind at rest? Kind Regards Tony
Admin  
#2 Posted : 13 August 2004 12:39:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Ron Hunter A very difficult one this - it can be almost impossible to alter mindsets and preconceived notions no matter the amount of competent advice or counselling given. We gave over a similar problem to our occupational health provider, who provided "counselling". Those in the building trades, or from an engineering background (like me) have probably all been exposed several times over the years, but few of us are going to spend our lives fretting about the possibility of contracting mesothelioma, etc. At the very least, any exponents of the 'single fibre' theory should be driven out of town, and otherwise explain that unless exposure is repeated or gross, then the likelihood is extremely small?
Admin  
#3 Posted : 18 August 2004 20:00:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Stuart Nagle I belive the corect procedure for employees who may have been exposed to asbestos, under the regs and guidance, is medical surveillance and maintaining records for 40 years. being in the area alone however is not a criteria for intervention by medical suveillance etc, unless the asbestos is/was in such a condition that fibres were being released into the air due to its condition or due to normal operations in the area... Stuart
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.