Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 30 November 2004 05:58:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By David Wallington Hi gang just a little question re: Safety People, titles and professional use. Im just curious how many names companies can give to staff who manage safety in the work place. Im have the title of, Occupational Safety and Health Officer/Fire Safety Officer. How ever I seem to be misinterpreted as being my employers risk manager, a task I corrected with the Executive recently. I deal specifically with occupational safety risk, not coporate, clinical, information, communications risks and so on. Im am interested in what names the corporate world give to safety proffessionals out there. And if there is a perception of OSH being all emcompassing of every risk in industry. OH its a laovely 24 degress celsius in sunny perth western australia today. Gday to all in the homeland UK :) Dave
Admin  
#2 Posted : 30 November 2004 07:35:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Richard Spencer Dave We can do better than that on the East Coast, we recorded 44 degrees C today Tuesday 30 Nov 04. I am at home now following a refreshing dip in the pool and sitting in the Aircon sipping my first glass of Chardonnay – Margaret River of course. Life is hard mate - what do they say "you've got one life, make the best of it". C'mon all you poms we need your skills over here. UK emigration topped Asian migration for the first time since the demise of that hated SOB Paul Keating. So get your applications in. Richard
Admin  
#3 Posted : 30 November 2004 08:18:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Ian Stone Is that a job offer Richard??? Ian
Admin  
#4 Posted : 30 November 2004 11:34:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Merv Newman My first title was Risk Management Coordinator, again only referring to HSE. After that I was "Safety Engineer" which I wasn't. Then i was Manager, HSE department. Finished up as Safety Management Systems Consultant. Right now I'm The Boss. (ok, Senior SMS consultant) The French did a survey a few years back and came up with about 150 job titles for people doing what the english call, traditionally, "Safety Officer" (which I think is an ok title if you are in the forces, but is a bit off in civilian life) Merv It's a bit early for a glass right now, but come the evening I'll be on the terrace watching the sun go down with a glass of real jura chardonnay - they make it just up the road from here.
Admin  
#5 Posted : 30 November 2004 12:42:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Mike Craven In response to David's original question, titles are fairly meaningless - it's what's in the job description that matters. In the past couple of years, I've been Safety Officer, Health & Safety Manager, Health & Safety Adviser and Health & Safety Manager again with little change to what I actually do. The most recent change was a "regrade" from "Adviser" to "Manager", which was my employer and manager's way of raising the profile of health and safety! and justifying my successful request for a pay rise - and who I am to argue with that! My job description hasn't changed too much, except that the position gets "talked-up" a bit more in the narrative, and I have line manager responsibility for the modern apprentice - having lost responsibility for the deleted post of Assistant H&S Adviser. I think they sell Australian chardonnay at Sainsburys. Mike
Admin  
#6 Posted : 30 November 2004 16:46:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Lisa Eldridge some organisations -particularly smaller care/health establishments combine h&s as part of overall risk management. I am currently - get this for a long title - Health & safety & Quality manager - a bit of a mouthful really.
Admin  
#7 Posted : 30 November 2004 17:26:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Merv Newman If they ofer you QHSE (quality, Health, Safety and Environment) be careful you don't get the security guards as well. Australian chardonnay is 2 for 1 at tescos this week. Great stuff, but needs thorough chilling.
Admin  
#8 Posted : 30 November 2004 19:28:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Stuart Nagle Dave. I hope you get sunburnt - you git !! Stuart
Admin  
#9 Posted : 01 December 2004 17:00:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Derek Rooney MIOSH MIIRSM My current title is Health, Safety & Environment Officer after previously being co-ordinator, advisor & Manager (Personally titles don't mater to me) What does matter is i'm freezing my b@lls off in glasgow & you gits are soaking up the sun. Send me that application! You can keep your wine though. Dez
Admin  
#10 Posted : 01 December 2004 18:47:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Raymond Rapp Dave I agree job titles can be confusing at times but more so for those who are unfamilar with h&s. Perhaps IOSH could establish a protocol for titles when they have sorted out their own members status and titles. On the other hand...My job title is really quite simple - Health and Safety Representative, 'cause I'm a TU rep. Meanwhile, I would love to work 'down under' but the money is crap. Rather get a job in Dubai. G'day Ray
Admin  
#11 Posted : 01 December 2004 19:45:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jeff My intuitive response would be to say that if you call yourself a H&S 'Officer' you are putting yourself at risk of being regarded as being responsible for H&S. But if you use the term H&S Advisor it properly describes the job role and, hopefully, shows employees and managers that yours is an advisory post only. The term officer seems to me to be outdated and comes from the days pre '74 (and for 10/20 years afterwards) when the Safety Officer was perceived to be responsible for H&S.
Admin  
#12 Posted : 18 December 2004 15:15:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jack Health and Safety Officer grates with me too. I don't think it infers that the post holder is 'responsible' for h&s though; I see it as a throw back to an internal enforcement role rather than an advisory one. I have some concerns about 'Health and Safety Manager' too. There should be no problem with it if everyone perceived it to be the person who managed the h&s function. Unfortunately many perceive this role, too, to be the person responsible for h&s. So I tend to also favour 'adviser'.
Admin  
#13 Posted : 18 December 2004 18:30:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Don Harrison We should have a prize for the longest or the daftest title. I would win on both counts. I'm currently "Responsible Care, Quality & Training Manager" I've even been "Responsible Care Process Owner" once, which was utterly meaningless. The Safety Advisors who work for used to be called "Responsible Care Facilitators" in our madly-named workplace. The joke is we almost called the scaffolders "Erection facilitators" but that has to be apocryphal. Doesn't it? Don, Teesside
Admin  
#14 Posted : 18 December 2004 20:12:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Laurie I started in the 80s as COSHH Advisor - believe it or not that is all I did - COSHH advice, assessment and training. The rest of H&S was looked after by a different guy, and we reported to different managers! Then I became H&S Co-ordinator, then H&S Officer, then H&S Advisor and then back to H&S Officer. About ten years ago there was some public discussion about the difference, if any, between the terms officer and advisor. Legal opinion suggested that an "Officer" would be regarded as an officer of the company, and had certain legal responsibilities. An "Advisor" was just that, and whether people took the advice or not was their responsibility not his/hers. Would be interesting to know if that legal opnion remains the same in 2004. I'm not aware of any case law precedent. Laurie
Admin  
#15 Posted : 19 December 2004 21:22:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By kevin reynolds hi there. I am currently struggling with an application for "safety and Risk manager" and what an employer expects as opposed to advertising for a safety officer,advisor,manager etc. any guidance appreciated.
Admin  
#16 Posted : 20 December 2004 09:46:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Seth Pierce At present my job title is: Health, Safety and Environmental Adivisor. Redcently added to this was Fire Safety Manager but due to business cards only being approx 85mm long we couldn't fit it all on. If there's a job going in Austalia I'd be more than interested. I do have immediate family in Auz so obtaining a visa shouldn't be too much of a problem. Seth
Admin  
#17 Posted : 20 December 2004 15:30:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By John Mackessack Mine's a bit different: Health & Safety Specialist. The jury is out on this one but I don't care what I'm called as long as it's not 'officer'. Chilean Merlot for me tonight. John
Admin  
#18 Posted : 20 December 2004 15:57:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By J Knight I've twice been an Adviser and am now a Manager. I don't object to the Manager bit, as I do manage the process here, and when people (inevitably) think that I'm the guy wot does the risk assessments I just tell them I'm not. We also intend to use 'H&S Lead' for the non-specialist in the workplaces (we have just over 400 nationwide) who will be trained to do the RAs and will also produce the returns and actually administer the SMs on the ground, my previous employer calls them H&S Links, John
Admin  
#19 Posted : 20 December 2004 15:58:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By J Knight PS, Yes, I also object strongly to Officer for all the reasons stated here
Admin  
#20 Posted : 21 December 2004 10:01:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Hilary Charlton My title is "Environmental, Health and Safety Advisor" in my capacity for all things EH&S. I like a nice Bulgarian Merlot myself. Hilary
Admin  
#21 Posted : 21 December 2004 11:26:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Ron Young Group Safety Manager for all things safety, we also have a Group Health Manager who manages Occ. Health. We have regular meetings for the crossover issues and it works well. A fine Margaux or Barolo
Admin  
#22 Posted : 21 December 2004 11:59:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Dave Richardson I started out as a H&S Facilitator, part time.. Then I was promoted to full time and given the role of HS&E Officer. I am now H&S Specialist. What's in a name Merlot, Chardinay, advisor, officer, specialist.... anything above 13% alcohol vol will do for me. Merry Xmas
Admin  
#23 Posted : 21 December 2004 14:23:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By John Mackessack Dave Anything above 13% is sherry isn't it? Creme de Menthe anyone?
Admin  
#24 Posted : 21 December 2004 16:28:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By J Knight PPS Wine is good, though white is favoured currently over red. Pale Rider (beer, from Kelham Island brewery Sheffield) is a cracker, though since it has flavour it won't be to Oz tastes :) John
Admin  
#25 Posted : 22 December 2004 13:32:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Tony Birchall No-one's touched on the difference between "Adviser" and "Advisor"! Check the theasaurus. Mind you, you probably don't give a Four x do you?
Admin  
#26 Posted : 22 December 2004 13:49:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Rob T Just about to come on to that point Tony. Adviser is American - Advisor is UK. I have variously been Safety Officer (with local authority), H&S Advisor, H&S Manager and Safety, Health, Environment & Fire (SHEF) Team Leader. Someone once told me that Officer meant you had the power to enforce matters whereas Advisor didn't. That may have been partly true in the old days (early nineties) but I don't think that applies in any way today. I prefer a good South African Pinotage. Where's Bryn Maidment - I thought that as he is the most recent emigree to Oz (that regularly uses this site) would have piped up with some Oz/Welsh "so much hotter, better sheep" type stuff by now.
Admin  
#27 Posted : 22 December 2004 14:32:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Ken Taylor I'm quite happy with 'Health and Safety Officer'. I'm not regarded as managing all H&S or simply one of the management and also not seen as just an adviser/or (I thought 'er' was English and 'or' Latin). Then I predate 1974 and so may be old-fashioned in that respect. We managed 7 degC on the Isle of Wight on Monday whilst those on the South East mainland tell me it was below zero - but perhaps they were exaggerating. We grow grapes and produce wine on the Island too and have been told that it's generally better than the French equivalent - if not the Australian version. I suppose this to be because they suffer from too much sun down there.
Admin  
#28 Posted : 23 December 2004 16:41:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jane Ling I've been finding this an interesting debate. After 10 years as Admin Manager with health and safety as part of this role I have just been appointed to a full-time health and safety role in the organisation. Interestingly they have chosen the title Health and Safety Controller (and yes I've already had all the jokes) which I notice nobody has yet mentioned on this thread. Personally I would have preferred co-ordinator or adviser for all the previously mentioned reasons. Jane
Admin  
#29 Posted : 26 December 2004 20:46:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Stuart Nagle It is interesting to note in this discussion that the term 'Officer' as in 'Health and Safety Officer' has not been recognised as only being adopted into general employment, but originated in Local Government. The term 'Officer' as in 'Local Government Officer' Arose to identify those who where paid a 'salary' above a certain 'spinal column point' in the local government pay scale structure and distinguished them from those who were tradesmen (on the tools), and which harks back many years to the days when the Borough Engineer was God and the Highways/Drainage/Waste etc Superintendants were next to God. it is also interesting that in our supposed classless society, even the most left wing of local authorities appear not to have noticed this and overlooked what can only be described a 'class distinction' based on the identity of those who obeyed orders and those who gave them... The 'Officers'
Admin  
#30 Posted : 27 December 2004 16:28:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Ken Taylor If we also term the Human Resources Officers, Finance Officers, etc, etc as advisers/ors to whom will the advice be given and who will issue instructions for its implementation? I suppose this will be the 'managers' - but wait a minute, isn't that term even more 'class-ridden'. Perhaps, then, we should all just advise each other and let everyone decide whether to take the advice or not? Perhaps it will be safer to just consider 'officer' as someone who has an office in which to work?
Admin  
#31 Posted : 04 January 2005 12:49:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Gary Hallett I've just read with interest the responses, within our company dependant who you speak to I'm refered to as that anoying pom(m), rooi-nek the safety guy/ officer/ manager/ adviser/or - I am based in Dubai had christmas lunch out side coldest it been was early in the Morning 19c.Quiet fond of the Old Jacobs Creek preferably red.
Admin  
#32 Posted : 04 January 2005 14:35:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By garyh You poor saps. Employers often give people in SH&E fancy titles designed to inflate the ego, whilst dumping any non glamarous responsibilities on them at the same time. So instead of a decent PROFESSIONAL Salary we tend to accept rates a good tradesperson can get, but then again a fancy title is such good compensation! The bottom line is, YOUR TITLE DOESN'T MATTER. What you are paid does.
Admin  
#33 Posted : 04 January 2005 15:27:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Ken Taylor I'd have to say, Gary, that, once you've sorted out the salary, it's also worth having a title with some credibility and a position in the organisation that enables you to exercise some influence. I still remember the advert for a Safety Officer/ Car Park Attendant!
Users browsing this topic
Guest (2)
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.