Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 14 March 2005 18:56:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Mike John Jones What is the 'norm' when you have contractors on site that are performing daily work that is categorised as work permit type works and the length of the contract can run into weeks, do you feel that the one general permit linked to excavation etc is sufficient, it seems a mega job to keep issuing them, I am referring to ground works that are going to take months to complete, I actively monitor the works on a daily basis, do you feel this is sufficient? Any reactive advice greatly appreciated!
Admin  
#2 Posted : 14 March 2005 19:43:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Robin B Hi Mike Whilst I don't have any direct involvement/hustory over this type of task what does the planning supervisor say about it? Some of the major construction companies may also be able to advise. Personally I have used long term permits for regular contractors coming on site but found that any controls were really non-existant Robin
Admin  
#3 Posted : 14 March 2005 20:02:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Laurie I used to issue a new permit once a week. If nothing else it made sure that standards didn't slip (including mine!) since they knew I was fully involved. If it's a really long project you could go to monthly Laurie
Admin  
#4 Posted : 15 March 2005 18:31:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Frank Hallett The real issue here is the issue of a PtW for activities that warrant a rather different approach. Routine isuuing of a PtW for ongoing work as descrobed actually devalues the whole PtW system and leads to a form of complacency that is extremely diffivult to deal with. Draw up a system for ensuring that those who are doing the work take primary control and they will then be responsible for issuing PtW's to their own and other staff. Remember the Octel experience though! Frank Hallett
Admin  
#5 Posted : 15 March 2005 19:21:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Stuart Nagle Mike. A permit to work for excavation works is a fairly new joiner to the traditional permits to work, only having been around for about 10 years or so to my knowledge. Excavations can pose all kinds of problems, based on the type of excavation being undertaken (hand, machine or mixture of both), what the ground type (chalk, clays, soft sands/silt etc) is, how deep (and how wide/long) the excavation will be, what lays in the ground (e.g. buried underground services, contamination from previous use land use etc) and what the weather conditions are (rain, freezing conditions, hot weather etc). Personally, I would base the issue of a permit to work on a decision (risk assessment) based on all of these factors, and also the competency of the persons undertaking the work, and additionally what type of work is being undertaken. Freezing of pipes on a water main to install a new valve or make a repair in an excavation may be of considerably higher risk than, for example, installing a ready made cess tank or excavating for a water service pipe, as additionally hazards are introduced by the work itself, not just the excavation. However, all conditions as mentioned above should be used to weight your decision. Normally, permits to work should not be issued for a period longer than a job will take or a shift of work (e.g. maxiumum 8 hours), whichever is the longer. For other high risk tasks this may be even more limited and involve lesser working times and change-over of persons undertaking the work ect. Something else you might want to consider! If, in your case you can justify issuing a permit to work for longer periods on a health and safety basis, following your assessment, fine.... just don't fall into the trap of issuing permits for longer periods just because writing them is a bore or a task you don't cherish!! .... This can be a domino that if it falls can lead to accidents or worse!!... it's all to easy to die in a hole in the ground if you are not working safely. In addition to the issue of permits to work, ensuring that persons are competent and that the safe systems of work (e.g. CAT and Genny use, location of buried underground services by hand excavation, protection and support of existing services where exposed and correct trench support are things that must be followed), as well as removal of spoil so as not to overburden trenches and prevention of plant, equipment and vehicles from edges of trenches to prevent trench collapse is also vital. Further to this, regular and routine monitoring and inspection of the works, as well as trench supporting structures is necessary (and maintenance of records of inspections) for excavation works of the type where such equipment is employed. Hope this provides a little more insight for you... Regards Stuart Nagle
Admin  
#6 Posted : 15 March 2005 20:27:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Chris Pope I have heard of contractors who issue excavation permits on the basis of chaneage: a permit for a given stretch of pipeline where all the relevant drawings are attached and the CAT scan of the area and the markings made on the ground can survive for the length of the permit, and the same staff are employed on the given task
Admin  
#7 Posted : 16 March 2005 09:01:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Terry Smyth Mike I had this problem also, regarding constant issuing of PTW certificates, my solution was to liaise with the contract Planning Supervisor and establish if the contract came under the CDM Regs. If the contract did come under CDM Regs then there was no need to issue any permit to work. Smaller contracts outside this remit were issued with a permit to work for the estimated duration of the contract. Additional specific permits were also issued in respect of Confined Spaces and Hot Work, only when it was established that the contract fell within the CDM Regs or when the contract was of short duration, then a PTW was issued. Specific permits could not be issued without one or the other being in place. Such specific permits were issued on a time factor of 4 working hours and renewed after consultation of progress with contractors. I hope this is of help. Regards Terry
Admin  
#8 Posted : 16 March 2005 09:57:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Richard Mathews Our permits are renewed daily this is so a check can be made that there are no changes to the circumsrtances in which the permit was issued. We use the same permit but there is a section for the update to be signed off with amedment that may be necessary added. However you do it, it isn't the permit itself that makes the job safe, it's the compliance with the required controls set out in the permit, so monitoring is essential. Richard
Admin  
#9 Posted : 19 March 2005 06:47:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Mike John Jones Thanks very much for all the suggestions and general advice, I very much appreciate it, I guess its a conflicting subject after all!
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.