Rank: Guest
|
Posted By David A Jones
We are in the process of reviewing our key performance indicators for health and safety.
Obviously we want a suitable mix of active and reactive measures.
I would be interested in what measures others use.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Jasonjg
Hi
I would have emailed you direct but here is a list I was cutting and pasting for a later date breakdown and elimination.
I am sorry that it may be repeated in places, some may also sound stupid etc.
I had not returned to this subject for some time and therefore just hope you get some ideas from it like I did. This is one area that I feel we could all benefit by sharing some tools and templates for other to get ideas from.
Good luck
Jason
Total number of injuries involving employees (especially, new employees), subcontractors or others on site:
Minor work-related injuries. For example, visits to first aid or medical facility;
Other work-related injuries which resulted in the worker taking time off work;I.e. Riddor reportable
Any work-related injuries that required a worker to undertake alternative work duties; and compensable work-related injuries.
Number of Incidents where there was damage to property (i.e. machinery, equipment, structures) or potential injury to employees, sub-contractors or others (i.e. near misses).
Cost of accidents
Cost of non injury accidents
Recurrence of incidents;
Number of injuries per body partNumber of injuries per area or department
Number of hazards identified through formal inspections
Number of improvement/prohibition notices from regulatory agencies
Number of poor working practices witnessed by management
Number of negative/warning comments/complaints from employees
Number of health & safety authority fines
Proactive or positive Indicators
Commitment by management to safety
Number of internal safety improvement notices
Percentage of people inducted
Number of inductions to industry standard
Number of tool box meetings held
Number of method statements signed off
Number of accidents/near misses investigated
Internal safety audit scores
External safety audit scores (if applicable);
Frequency of site safety meetings
Number of health & safety audits scheduled (internal and for sub contractors);
Number of health & safety audits completed (internal and for sub contractors);
Number of nonconformance reports raised on site
Number of nonconformance reports outstanding to date
Percentage of company employees observed performing a task correctly
Percentage of movement in attitude surveys
Number of employees attending training
Number of reported plant incidents
Number of contractor safety plans
Number of contractor plans audited
Number of contractor plans appraised
Number of safety committee meetings held
Number of safety committee inspections
Number of management workplace inspections
Percentage of actions closed out
Number of attendees at specific Health & Safety training courses
Number of weekly toolbox meetings held
Risk assessments revised, accepted and recorded
Number of clean up notices issued
Number of departures from safe work method statements
Number of issues identified on safety walks
Percentage of supervisor checklists not completed for week
Results of safety inspections, particularly continuing or repeated problems
Safety committee effectiveness
Audit of minutes of meetings
Annual culture survey
Annual performance reviews
Monthly audit of participation in the development of job safety analyses (JSA) as recorded on each JSA
Awareness of safe systems of work by employees and sub-contractors at toolbox meetings
Monitoring the involvement of the safety committee and site safety committee in the review of JSAs
Audit of inspection reports to check participants
Checking actual work performance against referees’ reports, interview results, evaluations.
Audit of accident investigation reports against hazard control reports
Audit of Health & Safety meetings to determine that problems are dealt with
Audit of actual state of plant and equipment against statutory requirements - monthly audits and random checks
Health & Safety performance of sub-contractors at tender evaluation stage and at completion of work
Number of JSAs conducted
Number of hazard inspections conducted
Number of Health & Safety training exercises held
Number of Health & Safety bulletins issued
Whether there is evidence that surveillance of sub-contractors is carried out (rated either yes or no);
The frequency of on-site inspections
The time taken to fix problems in accordance with the allocated timeframe
General attitude to safety on site (subjectively assessed by the Health & Safety coordinator);
Quality of records and documents related to Health & Safety (subjectively assessed by the Health & Safety coordinator);
Commitment to safety overall (subjectively assessed by the Health & Safety coordinator);
Percentage of injuries incurred for major hazards
Percentage of sub-standard conditions identified and corrected as a result of safety audits
Results of independent (by people in the same company but from different sites) and external audits. Measured as number, regularity, quality, outcomes and action taken to resolve non-conformances
Time taken to get hazards under control once they have been identified
Assessment of the availability and standard of PPE
Number of hazard reports and feedback from toolbox meetings
Return to work performance - to assess the effectiveness of rehabilitation
Content and, method of holding, chairing or presenting tool box meetings
Frequency and duration of tool box meetings
Participation level in tool box meetings
Worker assessment of supervisor/project management commitment to Health & Safety (but needs to be designed so as to be confident that responses are honest);
Assessment of the effectiveness of JSAs on site through audit of diary entries and discussions with site supervisors and workers
Assessment of effectiveness of on-site induction training (on basis of time taken to become a safe, independent worker);
Availability of equipment necessary to perform the job safely (assessed by audit/worker feedback);
Maintenance of equipment (audit of maintenance records);
An attitude shift amongst workers and clients measured by questionnaires or interviews. (Could be used at an enterprise and industry level.);
Workplace survey to determine levels of respect and a happy working environment. The survey would cover communication, consultation, participation in decision-making, and good human relations. (Could be used at an enterprise and industry level.);
Adherence to site rules - the number of punitive measures instigated on the job such as verbal alerts/warnings, infringement notices through to removal from site
Standard of housekeeping
Standard and availability of facilities and equipment
Amount of feedback from the ground up on Health & Safety matters
Reaction time to deal with issues that are raised
Independent feedback e.g. from Health & Safety agencies;
Reduction in the number of corrective actions required per inspection
Number of repeat problems occurring
Number of structured visits to site by corporate directors
Individual performance assessment and ratings
Number of Health & Safety committee/toolbox/team meetings attended by management;
Number of employees wanting to be part of committees and other participatory forums - taken as an indication of the effectiveness of the Health & Safety program;
Benchmarking - internal and external;
Inclusion of Health & Safety in tender specifications;
Sites develop and implement an Health & Safety improvement plan - this indicator is being tracked to ensure that plans are developed and implemented on all sites/projects;
Number of hazards controlled
Data from structured daily site observations
Planned observations of high risk activities - percentage of compliance
Monitoring local hazards
Level of improvement over time in audit ratings
Incident reporting frequency rate used as a positive indicator -
where the potential for accident or injury is reported,
opportunities to improve physical or behavioural safety increase;
Attitude surveys;
Number of equipment failures;
Level of industrial disputation related to Health & Safety issues.
Pre-placement health assessments;
Active participation and feedback from employees in toolbox/pre-start meetings etc;
Comparison of training provided against a benchmark or percentage e.g. 70% trained in welding;
Demonstrated use of appropriate work practices and preventative procedures;
Documented observations of compliance with housekeeping standards;
Using feedback from “weekly look ahead” meetings to identify risks and hazards;
Daily hazard reports.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Jasonjg
Sorry for bad layout, it looked ok on preview.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Ian Waldram
Also read the article in the current issue (vol. 03.2) of policy & practice in health and safety - a bit theoretical still, but good food for thought.
Step Change, the offshore industry best practice sharing initiative, have some helpful guidance, available on their website.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By David A Jones
Thanks for the responses - generally along the same lines as my thoughts but a couple of useful extras.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Philip McAleenan
David,
The OECD produce useful guides including
SAFETY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS,
Guidance for Industry, Public Authorities and Communities for developing SPI Programmes related to Chemical Accident Prevention, Preparedness and Response.
I have this as a pdf document. E-mail me and I will reply with a copy
Philip
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.