Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 11 January 2006 16:57:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By David A Jones
We are in the process of reviewing our key performance indicators for health and safety.

Obviously we want a suitable mix of active and reactive measures.

I would be interested in what measures others use.
Admin  
#2 Posted : 11 January 2006 18:08:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jasonjg
Hi

I would have emailed you direct but here is a list I was cutting and pasting for a later date breakdown and elimination.

I am sorry that it may be repeated in places, some may also sound stupid etc.

I had not returned to this subject for some time and therefore just hope you get some ideas from it like I did. This is one area that I feel we could all benefit by sharing some tools and templates for other to get ideas from.

Good luck

Jason


Total number of injuries involving employees (especially, new employees), subcontractors or others on site:

Minor work-related injuries. For example, visits to first aid or medical facility;

Other work-related injuries which resulted in the worker taking time off work;I.e. Riddor reportable

Any work-related injuries that required a worker to undertake alternative work duties; and compensable work-related injuries.
Number of Incidents where there was damage to property (i.e. machinery, equipment, structures) or potential injury to employees, sub-contractors or others (i.e. near misses).

Cost of accidents

Cost of non injury accidents

Recurrence of incidents;

Number of injuries per body partNumber of injuries per area or department

Number of hazards identified through formal inspections

Number of improvement/prohibition notices from regulatory agencies
Number of poor working practices witnessed by management
Number of negative/warning comments/complaints from employees
Number of health & safety authority fines

Proactive or positive Indicators

Commitment by management to safety

Number of internal safety improvement notices

Percentage of people inducted

Number of inductions to industry standard

Number of tool box meetings held

Number of method statements signed off

Number of accidents/near misses investigated

Internal safety audit scores

External safety audit scores (if applicable);

Frequency of site safety meetings

Number of health & safety audits scheduled (internal and for sub contractors);

Number of health & safety audits completed (internal and for sub contractors);

Number of nonconformance reports raised on site

Number of nonconformance reports outstanding to date

Percentage of company employees observed performing a task correctly
Percentage of movement in attitude surveys

Number of employees attending training

Number of reported plant incidents

Number of contractor safety plans

Number of contractor plans audited

Number of contractor plans appraised

Number of safety committee meetings held

Number of safety committee inspections

Number of management workplace inspections

Percentage of actions closed out

Number of attendees at specific Health & Safety training courses
Number of weekly toolbox meetings held

Risk assessments revised, accepted and recorded

Number of clean up notices issued

Number of departures from safe work method statements

Number of issues identified on safety walks

Percentage of supervisor checklists not completed for week

Results of safety inspections, particularly continuing or repeated problems

Safety committee effectiveness

Audit of minutes of meetings

Annual culture survey

Annual performance reviews

Monthly audit of participation in the development of job safety analyses (JSA) as recorded on each JSA

Awareness of safe systems of work by employees and sub-contractors at toolbox meetings

Monitoring the involvement of the safety committee and site safety committee in the review of JSAs

Audit of inspection reports to check participants

Checking actual work performance against referees’ reports, interview results, evaluations.

Audit of accident investigation reports against hazard control reports
Audit of Health & Safety meetings to determine that problems are dealt with

Audit of actual state of plant and equipment against statutory requirements - monthly audits and random checks

Health & Safety performance of sub-contractors at tender evaluation stage and at completion of work

Number of JSAs conducted

Number of hazard inspections conducted

Number of Health & Safety training exercises held

Number of Health & Safety bulletins issued

Whether there is evidence that surveillance of sub-contractors is carried out (rated either yes or no);

The frequency of on-site inspections

The time taken to fix problems in accordance with the allocated timeframe

General attitude to safety on site (subjectively assessed by the Health & Safety coordinator);

Quality of records and documents related to Health & Safety (subjectively assessed by the Health & Safety coordinator);
Commitment to safety overall (subjectively assessed by the Health & Safety coordinator);

Percentage of injuries incurred for major hazards

Percentage of sub-standard conditions identified and corrected as a result of safety audits

Results of independent (by people in the same company but from different sites) and external audits. Measured as number, regularity, quality, outcomes and action taken to resolve non-conformances
Time taken to get hazards under control once they have been identified
Assessment of the availability and standard of PPE
Number of hazard reports and feedback from toolbox meetings
Return to work performance - to assess the effectiveness of rehabilitation

Content and, method of holding, chairing or presenting tool box meetings

Frequency and duration of tool box meetings

Participation level in tool box meetings

Worker assessment of supervisor/project management commitment to Health & Safety (but needs to be designed so as to be confident that responses are honest);

Assessment of the effectiveness of JSAs on site through audit of diary entries and discussions with site supervisors and workers

Assessment of effectiveness of on-site induction training (on basis of time taken to become a safe, independent worker);

Availability of equipment necessary to perform the job safely (assessed by audit/worker feedback);

Maintenance of equipment (audit of maintenance records);
An attitude shift amongst workers and clients measured by questionnaires or interviews. (Could be used at an enterprise and industry level.);

Workplace survey to determine levels of respect and a happy working environment. The survey would cover communication, consultation, participation in decision-making, and good human relations. (Could be used at an enterprise and industry level.);

Adherence to site rules - the number of punitive measures instigated on the job such as verbal alerts/warnings, infringement notices through to removal from site

Standard of housekeeping

Standard and availability of facilities and equipment

Amount of feedback from the ground up on Health & Safety matters
Reaction time to deal with issues that are raised

Independent feedback e.g. from Health & Safety agencies;
Reduction in the number of corrective actions required per inspection
Number of repeat problems occurring

Number of structured visits to site by corporate directors
Individual performance assessment and ratings

Number of Health & Safety committee/toolbox/team meetings attended by management;

Number of employees wanting to be part of committees and other participatory forums - taken as an indication of the effectiveness of the Health & Safety program;

Benchmarking - internal and external;

Inclusion of Health & Safety in tender specifications;

Sites develop and implement an Health & Safety improvement plan - this indicator is being tracked to ensure that plans are developed and implemented on all sites/projects;

Number of hazards controlled

Data from structured daily site observations

Planned observations of high risk activities - percentage of compliance

Monitoring local hazards

Level of improvement over time in audit ratings

Incident reporting frequency rate used as a positive indicator -
where the potential for accident or injury is reported,

opportunities to improve physical or behavioural safety increase;
Attitude surveys;

Number of equipment failures;

Level of industrial disputation related to Health & Safety issues.
Pre-placement health assessments;

Active participation and feedback from employees in toolbox/pre-start meetings etc;

Comparison of training provided against a benchmark or percentage e.g. 70% trained in welding;

Demonstrated use of appropriate work practices and preventative procedures;

Documented observations of compliance with housekeeping standards;
Using feedback from “weekly look ahead” meetings to identify risks and hazards;

Daily hazard reports.

Admin  
#3 Posted : 11 January 2006 18:09:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jasonjg
Sorry for bad layout, it looked ok on preview.
Admin  
#4 Posted : 11 January 2006 19:57:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Philip McAleenan
David,
have a look at Neil Budworth's paper, Indicators of Performance in Safety Management at this link, http://www.web-safety.com/Exchange/index.htm

Philip
Admin  
#5 Posted : 12 January 2006 09:55:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Ian Waldram
Also read the article in the current issue (vol. 03.2) of policy & practice in health and safety - a bit theoretical still, but good food for thought.

Step Change, the offshore industry best practice sharing initiative, have some helpful guidance, available on their website.
Admin  
#6 Posted : 12 January 2006 13:09:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By David A Jones
Thanks for the responses - generally along the same lines as my thoughts but a couple of useful extras.
Admin  
#7 Posted : 13 January 2006 13:24:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Philip McAleenan
David,

The OECD produce useful guides including
SAFETY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS,
Guidance for Industry, Public Authorities and Communities for developing SPI Programmes related to Chemical Accident Prevention, Preparedness and Response.

I have this as a pdf document. E-mail me and I will reply with a copy

Philip
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.