Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 03 August 2006 11:11:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By john heath Does anybody have a smoking policy for the whole of its premises including outside. As the company wants to enforce a whole ban on its premises. Regards john Heath
Admin  
#2 Posted : 03 August 2006 13:22:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By George Wedgwood Have a look at http://www.easybreathing...ample_smoking_policy.doc for a smaple policy and at the Norther Ireland site - http://www.healthpromoti...e%20smoking%20policy.pdf There are lots of other on the web but do use the IOSH document as a reference (http://www.iosh.co.uk/index.cfm?go=news.item&id=606).
Admin  
#3 Posted : 03 August 2006 15:00:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Rob T Hey John, Since when have your company owned the air outside their building. Personally I'd tell them to shove it or make it a management decision not a safety one. Then staff will see that it's got nothing to do with health, just management being petty to the n'th degree.
Admin  
#4 Posted : 03 August 2006 15:04:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By The toecap Whilst we are on the subject. OUr policy waffles on about looking after the interests of our employees etc. But what gets me is the policy fails to look after employees who work in occupied premises, namley houses, where the occupier smokes. Can anybody give me sensible ideas of how this can be addressed. I don't think a mask is sensible, although i have suggested asking the occupier to leave the building or smoke in another room. What other suggestions are there?
Admin  
#5 Posted : 03 August 2006 15:05:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Steven Rob Any place that there are smokers having a puff on work premises either outside or in, is a safety issue - a fire safety issue Our company bans smoking on site for fire safety reasons and everyone accepts this policy Steve - smoker
Admin  
#6 Posted : 03 August 2006 15:08:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Rob T Steve, No not everywhere is a fire issue. I used to work on an high explosive site but there were still areas where you could smoke! Obviously if there's a specific fire risk it would be the height of stupidity to show any naked flame. Come on be reasonable - you knew I didn't mean where there was a specific risk.
Admin  
#7 Posted : 03 August 2006 15:14:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Colin J Even though our MD is a smoker he has produced a no smoking policy and smoking is banned in all buildings. Funny enough I've never seen him standing outside with the rest of the smokers!
Admin  
#8 Posted : 03 August 2006 15:16:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Steven Point taken - but you can take the stupid away from the possible but not the stupidity out of the stupid. That didn't make sense but then again it is nearly friday.
Admin  
#9 Posted : 03 August 2006 15:26:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Steve Derby A number of years ago I made recommendations and implemented a policy restricting smoking via the Safety Committee, after complaints from employees. No problem in itself but it caused no end of other issues regarding when personnel could smoke, where and for how long. Thankfully the Site Manager made it very clear that the origins of the policy where entirely correct but all the follow-on issues were general management issues and not a matter for the safety committee or the safety manager - saved me no end of grief!!!
Admin  
#10 Posted : 03 August 2006 19:40:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Merv Newman I'm with Rob T on this one. Again. Smoking/no smoking is either a health or a safety issue. Maybe sometimes both if you are on a "dangerous" site No smoking in the building is a health issue. No smoking on a refinery or equivalently dangerous site is normally a safety issue but they often install "smoking cabins" at remotish areas of the site. (I recently had to search out and buy a "mechanical" camera (no battery) so as to comply with site regulations. Not easy) "no smoking outside the building" is neither a health not a safety issue. It is one of "corporate image" (huddled masses taking a quick drag around the corner) Nowadays when I visit a "dangerous" site I slap on a patch before I get out of the car. Usually gets me through the day (if they supply lots of coffee) Merv
Admin  
#11 Posted : 04 August 2006 08:58:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By john heath Hi Rob To me it is not a fire issue as there is already a designated smoking shelter away from are building, which we have had for the last two years with no problems on site. But my managing Director wants a total ban. We can do this with the new smoking laws that come in next year as long as we give them between 3-6 months notice. But the problem we will have is 150 employees smoke on site.
Admin  
#12 Posted : 04 August 2006 09:07:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Mike Herbert Not entirely on topic but...... Have a look at this site for fine demonstration of stupid. http://archive.theargus.co.uk/2006/8/3/213350.html Surely in line for a darwin award!! Happy friday mike
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.