Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 24 August 2006 12:30:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By NSO I don't usually mind reading regs etc but the Simple Pressure Vessel Regs leave me cold. We produce welded heat exchanger units and then fix ancilliary pipework to the assembled unit. Compressed air is then used to check for leaks at 40psi. The construction doesn't appear to fall within the realms of the regs, can anyone point me in the general direction of user friendly guidance to understand the regs.
Admin  
#2 Posted : 24 August 2006 13:36:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By garyh Surely you pressure test with water due to the inherent explosion risk with air if the vessel fails (water is not compressible and so can't store energy - sorry if I am patronising you!!)
Admin  
#3 Posted : 24 August 2006 13:50:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By NSO The welded parts are subjected to a water test at higher pressure. This particular test is for 15mm and 22mm copper pipework attached to the unit. Essentially this is to test that compression joints which are fitted later in the process are sealed. Sorry to have been a little misleading.
Admin  
#4 Posted : 24 August 2006 14:03:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jeffrey Watt Hmmm. I had the same conversation with an engineer once, no convincing them to use water. Mainly because the insurance engineers test gas pressure vessels on site with air I couldn't convince the engineer it was a bad idea to test something that was designed to carry liquids with a gas. Bad comms day. Jeff
Admin  
#5 Posted : 24 August 2006 14:05:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jeffrey Watt Hmmmm of sympathy was directed to gary not nick.
Admin  
#6 Posted : 24 August 2006 14:11:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jeffrey Watt Not that I don't sympathise Nick, it was just your reply came up in between me reading gary's post and you posting your reply. Apologies to everyone I can't string a sentence together today. Jeff
Admin  
#7 Posted : 24 August 2006 14:47:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Merv Newman It's an extremely long time since I had to get into pressure vessel regs, but isn't there a minimum diameter (20 cm anyone ?) before it becomes a "vessel" ? Merv
Users browsing this topic
Guest (2)
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.