IOSH forums home
»
Our public forums
»
OSH discussion forum
»
Construction Head Protection Regulations 1989
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By JEB
What was the effect of the regulations on the reduction of fatalities/injuries on building sites?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Chris Pope
Frank Davies (head honcho HSE I think, at the time) told us at a seminar in Exeter in 1996 that it was the best regulation the HSE have ever had saving annually 20 - 30 lives. He had once witnessed a nut (metal one) falling off a tall engineering plant and coming to rest in someones throat having passed through his unprotected skull.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By steven bentham
It is my view that these have been significant in reducing serious head injuries.
In my short time (5 years) in construction, I have three clear accidents where the i.p. would have been very seriously injured or killed if he did not have a hard hat on.
(I fully agree that the other measures should have worked but when they don't this last resort measure can in some circumstances work).
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By John P
I agree that these Regulations have been very effective but can someone out there tell me why these Regulations didn't get replaced by the PPE Regs in 1992?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By gham
Must have been some size of nut
Im emailing mythbusters (imsure they did this with a penny off the Eiffel Tower.......)
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By lewes
"Im emailing mythbusters (imsure they did this with a penny off the Eiffel Tower.......)"
I think it was the Empire State Building but who's splitting hairs or nuts :o)
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By rks
i think it is myth.
I think if I remember correctly A kilogramme weight will fall at 10m per sec and this will be reduced to something like 9.89 m per sec due to gravitational resistance. In this respect a penny will not have the desired speed to penetrate the skull......Unless it is attached to a 10 kg weight!
Regards
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By gham
I think it accelerates at 9.61 m/s/s and reaches terminal velocity after 10m. but we've hijaked the thread sorry
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Lynne Ratcliffe
Recently told that in 'places foreign and abroad' where we are using local contractors to assist in 'reconstruction plans' we have been trying to get the locals to wear hard hats and boots with little success. One accident where the guy was wearing hard hat and only suffered a cut has convinced the others on that site to wear hats and this has now spread to other sites and areas.
|
|
|
|
IOSH forums home
»
Our public forums
»
OSH discussion forum
»
Construction Head Protection Regulations 1989
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.