Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Adrian Watson Does the "accident investigation model" predetermine the findings of the investigation?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Richie Ah, the good old days...
"Sergeant Major, Wheel the guilty b*^%*rd in!"
Richie
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Jez Corfield With all these strange questions, I feel like I am on my class one again....
Jez
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Tony Brunskill Jez,
Tell me Adrian was not in charge of your Class 1. By the way guys you have to respond on a Monday afternoon and spend no more than 40 minutes on each question.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Tony Brunskill Adrian,
It depends on the model. The problem with most models is that they assume only one guilty party and fail to address "contributors".
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Brett Day
Hang on, I did the TOPSET method and they have a section for People - includes 'guilty' party, witnesses, managers, supervisors and 'Others'.
Richie, sounds familier. Blew up the CO's landrover by mistake, honest !! Heard the same sort of comment at the review.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Jez Corfield Hi Tony
Adrian didnt do my class one, but he was wheeled out now and again when we needed to taught something difficult, like accident causation models....
My thoughts - the number of different models available, means you can pick one that suiyts your particular circumstances.
Cheers
Jez
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Tony Brunskill Bit like Hanibal Lecture
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By peter gotch Hi Adrian,
Not necessarily, but yes VERY often.
Regards, Peter
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.