Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

IOSH Forums are closing 

The IOSH Forums will close on 5 January 2026 as part of a move to a new, more secure online community platform.

All IOSH members will be invited to join the new platform following the launch of a new member database in the New Year. You can continue to access this website until the closure date. 

For more information, please visit the IOSH website.

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 23 July 2007 09:50:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Booney
Good Morning All,

Can anyone tell me what likely environmental impact PAT testing can have please?

Apparently, in our last environmental management system audit, the auditor was checking dates on PAT labels - I can't see the relevance - am I missing something?

Kind Regards

Booney
Admin  
#2 Posted : 23 July 2007 10:01:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Robert K Lewis
My strange auditors mind suggests that he is verifying that management system procedures set down are in fact implemented. In a roundabout way lack of following one process may indicate that others are also short circuited - It is actually a pretty good indicator and always can suggest a closer look.

Bob
Admin  
#3 Posted : 23 July 2007 11:49:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Booney
Thanks Bob, I understand where you're coming from and that line of thinking however, this was an environmental management system audit and we don't have a safety management system in place so, like I said, I don't understand the need to check the PAT labels.
Maybe they were just being nosey...
Admin  
#4 Posted : 23 July 2007 12:07:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Robert K Lewis
If you think about it - if you have labels for PAT testing with a next test date on and these are overrun then it suggests that general management is either weak or inefficient - both of which could cause an issue in environmental control or management. It is not a matter of whether there is a safety system or not. If managers set in place a process they should monitor compliance with the requirements, if not then it is pointless having the control.

Bob
Admin  
#5 Posted : 23 July 2007 12:49:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Ron Hunter
Some Organisations replace Class 2 hand-held appliances rather than test them (an example - hand-held hair dryers in a training environment). In safety & cost terms, this is a reasonable, balanced approach - but not kind to the environment!
Admin  
#6 Posted : 23 July 2007 13:31:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Booney
Seems a bit extreme to me but I take your point Bob - you weren't a detective in a previous existence were you? :}

Many thanks for the postings
Admin  
#7 Posted : 23 July 2007 13:36:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Robert K Lewis
Booney

No Just a cynical old auditor looking for the hidden signs to give me a lead in to the system weaknesses:-)

The other one is noting how the conversation moves elsewhere when a question is asked:-)

Bob
Admin  
#8 Posted : 23 July 2007 13:57:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Merv Newman
I do lots of safety auditing. But I can't take time to look into all the details of every safety management system. So I "skim" most and go into the details of some. Looking at the dates of FE tests and checking the records will tell me a lot about routine equipment checks. A sideways question will give information on FE training and evacuation exercises.

Going ever further sideways and you can get into rescue and recovery. (with or without PTS counselling)If you need to.

Now relate that back to the Environment. How often are retention tanks or trays checked ? Is there a procedure for emptying and cleaning them ? Is it followed ? Are they really leak proof ? Still ?

Going general again : If one procedure is respected to the letter then that indicates that other procedures will probably also be well respected. If not, then not.

Back to the top : "skim some, do some" I usually pick a "critical" procedure; lock-out, hot work, confined spaces or other and chase it all the way down the line. back-of-the-hand stuff. If I end up with that warm, cuddly feeling then the place is probably pretty good. Otherwise, they need help.

Merv
Admin  
#9 Posted : 23 July 2007 15:47:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Booney
Gentlemen, thank you, much appreciated
Users browsing this topic
Guest (4)
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.