Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Booney Good Morning All,
Can anyone tell me what likely environmental impact PAT testing can have please?
Apparently, in our last environmental management system audit, the auditor was checking dates on PAT labels - I can't see the relevance - am I missing something?
Kind Regards
Booney
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Robert K Lewis My strange auditors mind suggests that he is verifying that management system procedures set down are in fact implemented. In a roundabout way lack of following one process may indicate that others are also short circuited - It is actually a pretty good indicator and always can suggest a closer look.
Bob
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Booney Thanks Bob, I understand where you're coming from and that line of thinking however, this was an environmental management system audit and we don't have a safety management system in place so, like I said, I don't understand the need to check the PAT labels. Maybe they were just being nosey...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Robert K Lewis If you think about it - if you have labels for PAT testing with a next test date on and these are overrun then it suggests that general management is either weak or inefficient - both of which could cause an issue in environmental control or management. It is not a matter of whether there is a safety system or not. If managers set in place a process they should monitor compliance with the requirements, if not then it is pointless having the control.
Bob
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Ron Hunter Some Organisations replace Class 2 hand-held appliances rather than test them (an example - hand-held hair dryers in a training environment). In safety & cost terms, this is a reasonable, balanced approach - but not kind to the environment!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Booney Seems a bit extreme to me but I take your point Bob - you weren't a detective in a previous existence were you? :}
Many thanks for the postings
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Robert K Lewis Booney
No Just a cynical old auditor looking for the hidden signs to give me a lead in to the system weaknesses:-)
The other one is noting how the conversation moves elsewhere when a question is asked:-)
Bob
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Merv Newman I do lots of safety auditing. But I can't take time to look into all the details of every safety management system. So I "skim" most and go into the details of some. Looking at the dates of FE tests and checking the records will tell me a lot about routine equipment checks. A sideways question will give information on FE training and evacuation exercises.
Going ever further sideways and you can get into rescue and recovery. (with or without PTS counselling)If you need to.
Now relate that back to the Environment. How often are retention tanks or trays checked ? Is there a procedure for emptying and cleaning them ? Is it followed ? Are they really leak proof ? Still ?
Going general again : If one procedure is respected to the letter then that indicates that other procedures will probably also be well respected. If not, then not.
Back to the top : "skim some, do some" I usually pick a "critical" procedure; lock-out, hot work, confined spaces or other and chase it all the way down the line. back-of-the-hand stuff. If I end up with that warm, cuddly feeling then the place is probably pretty good. Otherwise, they need help.
Merv
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Booney Gentlemen, thank you, much appreciated
|
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.