Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

IOSH Forums are closing 

The IOSH Forums will close on 5 January 2026 as part of a move to a new, more secure online community platform.

All IOSH members will be invited to join the new platform following the launch of a new member database in the New Year. You can continue to access this website until the closure date. 

For more information, please visit the IOSH website.

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 26 July 2007 21:40:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Paul Parry
Cutting a long story short I need an independant view on a safety railing.
I know it should be 1100mm high with no gap greater than 100mm or any horizontal railings.
It can also be made up of pretty much anything brick, railing etc to make 1100mm.

That's the easy bit.... the problem is the rail looks nothing like in the regs, ie straight up and down (i know its only a diagram)and the regs are a bit "wooley" or grey if you prefer.

It has a large vehicle bumper protrusion of 150 x 110mm integral to the safety railing about 450mm up. It is rounded but still large and easily enough for a child to stand on and fall over. Oh the barrier starts on the 5th floor !.
It only measures 650mm from the top of the vehicle bumper to the top of the safety railing.

I can supply photos with measurements.

Admin  
#2 Posted : 27 July 2007 09:05:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Adrian Watson
Paul,

Based on your description of the ledge it does not conform with the requirements of the Building Regulations. See paragraph 3.3 "The construction should be such that ... children will not be readily able to climb it."

Regards Adrian
Admin  
#3 Posted : 27 July 2007 10:22:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Bob Youel

risk assessment should also proactively take place and sometimes the RA requires/identifies different / tighter controls etc than the general specifications set down in the building regs

I advise that you go with the RA in the first instance

Some people blindly adhere to specifications when its obvious that addition risks exist that make the specifications less than adequate
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.