Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

3 Pages123>
Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 19 October 2007 17:59:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By stephen smith Hello everyone. I would like you all to think about the above question. I see quite regularly postings for basic H&S assessment formats, powerpoint presentations, etc & this causes me to ask the question, are these requests from persons who have not the discipline to research and then refine and develop those formats, information and documents. your thoughts on this friday regards stephen
Admin  
#2 Posted : 19 October 2007 18:15:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Richard Paul-Jones Yes.
Admin  
#3 Posted : 19 October 2007 18:49:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By CFT Possibly but not always; at the end of the day how do you know? I suppose if you have the time to help then it is down to the individual request. Me, I ignore 'me too's' I would ignore the ones such as "can I see your H&S policy to compare" and sample RA's; PP's don't really see a problem with, nor do I with a basic pro-forma for instance say HAZ OP S's or JSA's, sometimes I believe the person needs the template to work from without the information contained within, it is the latter I would have concerns over. CFT
Admin  
#4 Posted : 19 October 2007 23:13:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Rob Randall Hi Stephen, if you combine this question with a comment on a previous thread about some posts from (presumably) unqualified people bringing the website and the profession into disrepute I think we may have a problem! I know that this is a public forum and that we should expect genuine enquiries from people looking to tap into our expertise. I don't have a problem with this nor with discussions about best practice, legislative or case law detail from fellow professionals I have no wish to parade my qualifications but perhaps we should insist on the use of designatory letters when responding to such enquiries so that we, and the general public, can see whether or not the responses are from a "competent person". I personally feel that any requests for information should be carefully sifted to decide whether they are from a person in a H&S job who cannot be bothered to do his or her own research. If that is the case then I for one would not respond. Regards, Bob R
Admin  
#5 Posted : 19 October 2007 23:25:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Peter MacDonald But it's a public access forum......?
Admin  
#6 Posted : 20 October 2007 08:21:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Raymond Rapp This same question has been done to death on this forum...let's try something else.
Admin  
#7 Posted : 20 October 2007 14:19:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Merv Newman Ray, yes, it has been done to death but I would like to reiterate my position : I won't give out documents but I will advise on how to produce such documents. I often ask plant managers to write their own, personal, safety policy. I don't give examples as I want to see their own words/feelings. Those who do it best are those who sweat about it. It concentrates the mind. Same thing with "me toos". I don't give. I advise. Isn't that what they pay me the big money for ? Merv
Admin  
#8 Posted : 22 October 2007 09:29:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Paul Darby My concern is that when some views or opinions are expressed on here that show a completely unbalanced view to risk, that the same people then go back to their employer or staff and give them that same view and advice. There is nothing wrong with safety law in the UK, its the people that interpret it that make it onerous. It is absolutely clear that most of the poor image and reputaion health & safety has comes from inside our profession. There was still a discussion on here recently that a paper cut in an office could be assessed as fatal risk, because it may become infected, lead to septacemia and subsequently death!! That is extremely poor safety management, and if you tell an operational manager that it will fuel the fire about H&S being a pain in the backside. More importanatly, if serious risks do exist in that organisation it dilutes the response to controlling them if everything is a fatal risk, but clearly a number of people on here do not see the balanced, priority driven, risk based approach.
Admin  
#9 Posted : 22 October 2007 09:42:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Ali I believe it's about sharing information, best practice etc, which the HSE will applaud. Of course, the info should then be tailored to suit individual requirements otherwise it will have little value. I would have hoped that this tailoring would be carried out by someone competent , but not necessarily by the same person asking for the info. Ali
Admin  
#10 Posted : 22 October 2007 11:12:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Robert K Lewis There actually is a very significant issue here. How far can we actually go in providing information to others without having substantial knowledge of their situation? Only templates, RAs or procedures may be requested but these are generally not absolute fits for all. We tend sometimes to justify such things as preventing the re-invention of the wheel - But as our friend Arran L S said to me today - management tools are not wheels and they need to be designed to suit the place they are used - if he will excuse my precis!! In reality if we do this perhaps the mentoring situation is the only "safe" way forwards. Then the mentor can judge the individual understanding and can have some knowledge of the work situation to which the advice is being applied. Bob
Admin  
#11 Posted : 22 October 2007 11:26:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Tabs Let me think .... If no-one told me anything as I was learning, if my managers told me "find out for yourself", if no-one wrote books on the subject, or taught at University, would I know as much (?) as I know now ...?? We tut very loudly at firefighters not being allowed to use ladders - at headteachers making kids wear goggles for conkers ... We can't expect people to just know things, sharing knowledge, tips, systems, forms and experience is EXACTLY what my profession is about. It is up to us to make sure that those asking understand HOW and WHEN to use them - if we want to share them (no-one has yet compelled me to share anything, I do it when I think I should/can). If we want to progress, we need to be inclusive yet careful. Not everyone thrown into the H&S position has the opportunity to go off and do a diploma - or even a certificate sometimes. Yet they still have their colleagues interests at heart. Continue to help each other, it is worthy.
Admin  
#12 Posted : 22 October 2007 11:44:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Robert K Lewis Tabs But when does handing out forms etc suited to one company become a significant issue. Sharing ideas for others to apply is one thing - but what if a form is wrongly used or an ill fit to the new situation? Without the advice of a "mentor" the recipient can think all is well. Yes we all learn from others but this perhaps to be on a personal basis rather than the impersonal web forums. Bob
Admin  
#13 Posted : 22 October 2007 12:05:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Tabs "Yes we all learn from others but this perhaps to be on a personal basis rather than the impersonal web forums." Nothing says you have to be impersonal when sharing. When sending a template, one can explain it - and ask if the recipient understands it, and even offer help ... The initial question posted -if answered in the negative- would mean the closing of this forum, because we are not allowed to be exclusive or discriminating (under the Charity Commission terms and conditions - see members forum threads). Good question, I guess, but unlikely to change how the forum operates. If any of your advice is ambiguous or has a potential to harm rather than help, explain it. As I go about my job, I never just impose things in the workplace. I explain them and justify them.
Admin  
#14 Posted : 22 October 2007 12:12:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Seano I agree with tabs.... I think some of you guys need to get over yourselves.
Admin  
#15 Posted : 22 October 2007 12:19:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Pete48 Yes we should share, subject to our professional ethics and codes. Remember this is a public access forum, therefore anyone who takes any advice from this forum at more than face value should not rely upon it as anything more. It could be given by someone with no affiliation to IOSH whatsoever. Also we should not assume that anyone posting for advice is anything other than a member of the public looking for information.
Admin  
#16 Posted : 22 October 2007 12:54:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Arran Linton - Smith Tabs, I frequently see the outcome this form/document sharing culture were the majority of sub-contractor risk assessments and method statements are poor and often fall outside the scope of work being undertaken. Just as plagiarism is frowned upon in higher education, should we also be confronting this issue in our professional activities and is it ethical to issue documents for others to use when you are not aware of the competence of the person using your documents, their supervision and how these documents are going to be used? Also there is the issue of copyright.
Admin  
#17 Posted : 22 October 2007 13:46:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By AF I am all for sharing ideas, exchanging information, obtaining relevant downloads, etc, etc I do agree, what is best for one company is not necessary the best way for your own company......! After all, the company is employing you and paying you on the basis of your experience, knowledge and qualifications, not on the basis that you can plagarise someone elses work.......!
Admin  
#18 Posted : 22 October 2007 13:57:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jim Walker I think we should try to help where we can and remember we all had to start somewhere. I was once offered (at a price) a training document I'd given to someone on this forum - my name was still embedded ;-))), but what can you do. However, I dearly wish people would use the search first. I rarely look in this forum these days as virtually every posting is going over (and over & over) old ground.
Admin  
#19 Posted : 22 October 2007 14:00:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Tabs Arran, "I frequently see the outcome this form/document sharing culture were the majority of sub-contractor risk assessments and method statements are poor and often fall outside the scope of work being undertaken." What did they have before? And do you correct them? Do you select your suppliers after a due diligence of their systems, competencies and methodology? I cannot see how the route they use to obtain paperwork influences even a tiny bit compared to being refused the work because they don't understand what they are doing. Refuse them the job, and they will have the impetus to learn. "Just as plagiarism is frowned upon in higher education, should we also be confronting this issue in our professional activities and is it ethical to issue documents for others to use when you are not aware of the competence of the person using your documents, their supervision and how these documents are going to be used?" Rubbish, we are not at school now - I actually give my colleagues the answers to problems if I can. I encourage toolbox talks (akin to cheat notes) I put out briefing documents full of information that my managers can't be bothered to research. I am not a teacher, I am an adult trying to get people to understand things that might save their life. I have to be able to rely on other adults to do similar. I cannot guarantee competency of those using my documents, no - but that doesn't mean I should remain mute when asked for help. But you can feel free to. And when did a document hurt someone - can you explain the risk please? Incompetent person with no document -v- incompetent person with document from competent person ? (document might even give some hints as to what is needed) "Also there is the issue of copyright." I left school in 1978. Would you like to guess how many times I or any of those people I have ever worked with have ever been taken to task over copyright? Even if it exists, has it ever been enforced within my 29 years of work life? If I am sharing my own work, technically my employer could claim copyright, but they would be wasting money. Nice topic this, and some good exercise for the grey matter ... probably not going to change anyone's opinions though, but entertaining.
Admin  
#20 Posted : 22 October 2007 14:21:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Pete48 Tabs, I agree totally with your approach. What I worry about is that members of the public increasingly visit this site as "a good site for free H&S advice" and place more trust in the responses than perhaps they should. It has always intrigued me that you would rarely find a business that would make a key financial decision based solely on a website forum; but you can find businesses that have done just that for H&S, strange old world, don't you think? p.s. Sorry that has probably hijacked the thread.
Admin  
#21 Posted : 22 October 2007 14:33:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Arran Linton - Smith Tabs, Are you suggesting that plagiarism, competence and copyright are not matters that we should worry about in the course of our duties as Chartered Safety and Health Practitioners?
Admin  
#22 Posted : 22 October 2007 14:59:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Robert K Lewis As you will guess I am with Arran on this. Swapping ideas and swapping/giving forms are different things and there are always questions to be resolved every time we pass control of something to another person. I have noted a number of consultancies requesting items - where are these going to be put to use? - Not personal I would guess. As already alluded to above these documents can be sold on the open market - That is intellectual piracy in anybody's language. Ethically also we may be selling/giving poor information on the basis of a process of which we know little or nothing. Are we thus infringing the code of ethical conduct? If askers are open and I can have a dialogue that may be different but at this moment most requests are a "black box" Bob
Admin  
#23 Posted : 22 October 2007 15:12:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Tabs Arran, in terms of documents such as risk assessment templates, a permit to work template, or even powerpoint presentations, I doubt the currency of 'worry'. As a professional, I would not pass to Tom the work of Harry, unless I knew Harry had expressed a disinterest in pursuit of copyright (I will never pass to you a British Standard for example, but would quite happily share with you a risk assessment form designed by one of my friends who has knowledge that I have already shared it more than once). I had hoped I had explained my thoughts on competency - a forum will never be able to solve that issue, but it doesn't need to. We have the option of to share or not to share, and I did ask you to explain the risk you perceive. :-) Plagiarism? There is nothing wrong with plagiarism - if there was, we would have to erase history, burn books, destroy corporate memory and start each day as a blank. The next time you change jobs, will you walk in and throw away all the systems and paper work that was done by your predecessor? I won't (unless they were really bad). Being a Chartered Member means that I have the experience and the knowledge required for that particular grade. Funnily enough, in my case, that means I also recognise a need for networks to help others come on, and that those at the start of their career might be alone and struggling. My 'worry' is that they are left there to make bad decisions and poor systems. Look at the "IOSH Members Forum" and you will see that I have challenged the President of IOSH to provide a member-only forum for discussions of that nature. She is unable to help. So, we have to continue here instead. Bob - your argument about things going to consultancies, and being sold on ... so what? If you don't want to help them, don't. I never send to consultancies, or to those people who appear to be too lazy to look things up. Look at my posts and I seldom even give links, I give website names instead. Occasionally though someone wants help, and there is no harm in providing it. Again I ask you - how dangerous is a template exactly?
Admin  
#24 Posted : 22 October 2007 15:37:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Pete48 The transfer of information and knowledge can be a tricky business. I have this quote on my wall that helps me stay grounded for most of the time anyway. It is not mine but I use it frequently, always attributing it to the originator. "Some luck lies in not getting what you thought you wanted but getting what you have, which once you have got it you may be smart enough to see is what you would have wanted had you known." Garrison Keillor Plagiarism is defined as the unacknowledged use, as one's own, of work of another person, whether or not such work has been published. The most likely act of plagiarism would therefore be committed by the receiver and not the sender.(hopefully anyway!)
Admin  
#25 Posted : 22 October 2007 15:45:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Steve Cartwright I'm with you tabs. Some people would call it mentoring. Did you know you can actually claim CPD points for mentoring. One of the critisms the IOSH Branches had following a recent survey was that not enough Chartered Members acted as mentors. There is actually a campaign within the branch network to recruite members to act as mentors.
Admin  
#26 Posted : 22 October 2007 15:51:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Philip McAleenan Hold on Tabs - there is nothing wrong with plagiarism? As per Pete's response, plagiarism is to present someone else's work as your own and as such is a very serious offence that could cost the plagiary his reputation, his job and even end him up in court. This has been stated often on this site; have a search, you'll find it. Check it out in the dictionary too. regards, Philip
Admin  
#27 Posted : 22 October 2007 16:30:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Tabs Philip - sorry, yes you are right if the user is passing something off as their own. The more common, day to day use of the word plagiarism tends to mean 'using' someone elses work. Copying. Again it comes down to what you are willing to share. Don't share something that you don't want to. I have used other people formats / templates and no-one has asked me the providence of it - nor have i offered any when I forward things
Admin  
#28 Posted : 22 October 2007 16:55:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Arran Linton - Smith Tabs, The crux of the current problem is that in the long term you help nobody by letting them copy existing documentation. All that does is simply defer the development of their competence and stifle innovation.
Admin  
#29 Posted : 22 October 2007 17:08:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Tabs Something has just occurred to me ... If it is so bad to offer templates and documents to people that you cannot gauge the competency of, why do HSE, IOSH, Barbour, Consult GEE, and multiples of others do it? I would wager that some of here on this forum are better qualified and better experienced to do so than they are. After all, we are doing the job, not writing about it :-)
Admin  
#30 Posted : 22 October 2007 17:15:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Tabs "All that does is simply defer the development of their competence and stifle innovation." I don't believe that at all, but will happily consider any clear evidence you might have to prove that statement. Over the years I have used other people's work and improved it (hopefullly) as I moulded it to my needs. Besides, I have not set myself the task of being the profession's quality police - I am not sure that anyone else should either until we set the standards of competency and professional grade (and salary) required before being landed with the responsibilities. There are people out there who want help, and thankfully no-one can stop us giving it.
Admin  
#31 Posted : 22 October 2007 17:34:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Sally My organisation doesn't pay me to 'develop competence and be innovative'. It pays me to provide solutions to health & safety issues that comply with legislation and protect the workforce. When I look at what I do in a week it would take me twice as long if i didn't use forms, presentations, guidance notes etc that others have started I'm a very experienced H&S adviser (started the year the six pack came out) but still rely on others to share their expertise
Admin  
#32 Posted : 22 October 2007 17:53:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By David Bannister I had always believed that advancement was about building on what has been done before. We've come on a bit since caveman first used a stick to hunt and a flame to cook and some of us can now routinely do both. How did we learn? - by copying and building on the acquired skills and knowledge of our forbears. We no longer have to figure out how to rub two sticks together to make fire. Similarly in the H&S world, our predecessors stopped children going up chimneys and recognised that benzene is a carcinogen, whilst we are still making advances in H&S. I am very happy to share my accumulated knowledge on this forum but I would take great exception if I subsequently found it for sale by anybody else, passing it off as their own. In fact I would expect IOSH to take disciplinary action against any member doing this. However, once anything is posted here or sent via email it passes from our control. That is the crux of the matter and we should all remember this when we post here. It is our choice.
Admin  
#33 Posted : 22 October 2007 19:19:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Merv Newman Sally, May I take exception to your first sentence ? I feel quite strongly that part of the job of an H&S person is to develop competence in the people they are guiding. I have just spent the day showing a group of managers how to do safety audits, how to actually SEE what they walk past everyday. (second group tomorrow) I am trying to develop their competence in managing safety. That IS my job. I can't be holding their hand and doing it for them every day of the week. Innovation ? Well there is nothing innovative about this week's training. I've been doing roughly the same thing for the last 20 odd years. But, I'm a consultant (last week I couldn't even spell the word. Now I are one) I move from plant to plant. So the same old rhubarb is always new to them. However, I did work (as you do) for about 12 years as plant safety. i soon found out just how innovative you have to be. Last years safety plan or programme just ain't no good for next year. People get bored and lose interest. You have to keep coming up with something new. Innovative. Lastly, and I do apologise if I have upset you, Keeping up with the legislation and advising managers of their responsibilities is a small, though essential, part of our job. Motivating them and employees and developing their competence and commitment to H&S is the most essential part. And so (dramatic roll of drums, thunder and lightening, hail of rain) back to the plot. I don't supply templates, forms or procedures. Everyone of my contributions to this outrageous and egregious chat show is designed (apart from the odd recipe) (well, even them to be honest) to guide others to be more competent in their jobs. Trust me. I'm a consultant. (did I already say that ?) Merv, Limoges. Sun shining, 10°C Enjoy.
Admin  
#34 Posted : 22 October 2007 20:32:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Clive Lowery Ladies & Gents, Only just picked up on this thread but heres my two penneth for what its worth. Example 1 I recently responded to a request for an accident trend spreadsheet template, as it happens I had recently created one and was happy to share it with others. I received over 50 emails off forum of the me too variety. Some were obviously consultants building their library but a few were quite genuine and several emails later my spreadsheet has improved and no doubt so has theirs. Example 2 Replied earlier this year to a request for a copy of a construction company policy as new incumbent wanted an example to point him in the right direction. Several weeks later on a site as a subbie, started to read the main contractors policy and lo & behold almost word for word same as ours. Result = 1. Yes I will still help others like myself who are still working our way up the H & S ladder gaining experience as we go to hopefully make us more competent (where I feel my level of knowledge is suitable and sufficient), but I am more selective who I give information to. 2. No I won't supply my hard work to "Me Too's" or where I feel that the individual is merely too lazy or not competent to research the subject or worse still a consultant who is simply going to "sell" my work off as their own. I have received some excellent help and advice from these forums, no doubt so have others and feel it would be detrimental to the proffession if all that help was suddenly cut off and not available. Knowledge sharing is all well and good but it is frustrating when you see your hard work blatantly being used for free by others. To the people who have supplied me with info, I have always replied with a "Thank You" and any templates I have used I have always put a footer on stating who supplied it. Regards Clive
Admin  
#35 Posted : 22 October 2007 20:46:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Bob Shillabeer Just a thought, where would we have been if the first person to get a competence decided to keep it to himself, Probably he would still be a lone voice in the wilderness and many people would have died. Please can we get off this high plane of snobbery we seem to be falling into. Without other professionals being prepared to share thier knowledge and experience I know I would still be a dumb idiot doing things the way I thought was right and just hoping I would not get hurt doing it.
Admin  
#36 Posted : 22 October 2007 20:58:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Merv Newman Clive, good on yer. (just signed off for dinner. Entercote à point, pomme au four and a bottle of bourgueill. (Not, actually, the whole bottle) Please, use your expertise. Decide, for yourselves, who merit help and who merit the finger. (best translated as "vennez swiveler". Cheers. Merv (mildly inebriated)
Admin  
#37 Posted : 23 October 2007 10:27:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Pete Longworth Bob Shillbeer - Spot on. The whole tone of this thread is "We are competent - Don't you bone idle mere mortals bother us in our ivory towers because you are all too ignorant to understand what we do" How can someone using information freely given be construed as plagiarism? How did that ever get into this debate? Tabs is right - if you don't like sharing information - don't do it, just don't criticise others who do wish to share.
Admin  
#38 Posted : 23 October 2007 13:38:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Raymond Rapp Done my best not to get embroiled in this pointless debate. That said, if you were to pose a significant problem to 10 h&s practitioners you would probably get 7 - 10 different answers! Does that mean the minority are giving incompetent advice. Of course not. If h&s practitioners cannot see some common sense, what hope is there for the rest of society. The moral of the story is - there are no 'right and wrongs' in health and safety, on the proviso you can justify what you have done. Ray
Admin  
#39 Posted : 23 October 2007 20:57:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By TBC No - keep all your info to yourself and then nobody else will have the opportunity to learn. If somebody needs any help - give them it no matter what.
Admin  
#40 Posted : 24 October 2007 08:26:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Campbell Peden Simple answer Yes, if I can help or share any information that will help reduce accidents and improve safety anywhere I will gladly passs it on,.
Users browsing this topic
Guest (4)
3 Pages123>
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.