Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

IOSH Forums are closing 

The IOSH Forums will close on 5 January 2026 as part of a move to a new, more secure online community platform.

All IOSH members will be invited to join the new platform following the launch of a new member database in the New Year. You can continue to access this website until the closure date. 

For more information, please visit the IOSH website.

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 04 February 2008 11:14:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By alan brotherton While job searching, I have become amazed at the semingly never ending string of additional responsibilities employers want to tag on behind H/S. It is not uncommon for example to see jobs such as Health and safety, quality, environmental, facilities, security manager all rolled into one advertised and even some with H/R responsibility tagged on as well. I have to ask myself if such recruiters have ever heard the phrase "Jack of all trades but master of none" With respect to H/S in particular, how much actual time can be devoted to such a vital role with so many other responsibilities to attend to? What's that they say about sticking a broom somewhere and sweeping the floor at the same time !!
Admin  
#2 Posted : 04 February 2008 11:23:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Chris Jerman Yes and typically the salary range reflects the thinking on how important all of these issues are(n't)! Still being a QUENSH manager sounds very snazzy - I don't think. CJ
Admin  
#3 Posted : 04 February 2008 11:57:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By DP Fair points Alan but if you now look at all the industries/sectors that are now recruiting safety people it is still a massive step forward from 10 years ago. Small companies don't have the resources to employ safety people alone so some roles get the add ons. Got to be a plus that safety is in there. That's also a positive as the individual gets the development and its mainly all risk management.
Admin  
#4 Posted: : 04 February 2008 14:40:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Taff2 I would not moan - are not the line managers (especially in smaller firms) meant to be HR + operations + quality + facilities mangers - who also have immediate h&s responsibilities...
Admin  
#5 Posted : 04 February 2008 15:00:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By steven n I once seen an advert for a welder/accountant now there's diversity!
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.