Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

IOSH Forums are closing 

The IOSH Forums will close on 5 January 2026 as part of a move to a new, more secure online community platform.

All IOSH members will be invited to join the new platform following the launch of a new member database in the New Year. You can continue to access this website until the closure date. 

For more information, please visit the IOSH website.

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 13 March 2008 15:18:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By ChrisinMalta Dear all, I have to devise a method statement for an electrical installation job. Most of the work will involve working at a height of about 10 metres installing electrical conduit and equipment on a concrete ceiling in a very large hangar. The intention is to use portable scaffold for the job, which I think will last for 3/4 months. I am most concerned about the continual erection, dismantling, and moving of the scaffold and the fall protection arrangements. Does anyone please have something readymade that I could adapt? Best regards, Chris
Admin  
#2 Posted : 13 March 2008 15:38:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Carolc Have you considered using a MEWP?
Admin  
#3 Posted : 13 March 2008 16:33:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Mitch Chris, For that duration I would use fixed scaffolding, even if only gang planked in the required areas, with kickboards and handrailing etc. Mitch
Admin  
#4 Posted : 13 March 2008 16:42:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By CFT Chris Will the hanger be used during said works, and has a system been devised to allocate areas; or....do you have Carte blanche access with no active consideration to either person or other movements below you, due to protective measures to not permit access to other users? CFT
Admin  
#5 Posted : 14 March 2008 10:11:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Joe Quinn Hi Chris, If it were me I would go for the MEWP option so long as the users receive adequate training. Apart from the safety aspects you may want to consider that a MEWP will be less time-consuming than messing about with scaffolds. I have a comprehensive risk assessment available for a MEWP which is yours if you email me. Regards, Joe
Admin  
#6 Posted : 14 March 2008 20:43:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By patrick carr for the job mentioned, imop,MEWPS, but you will have to have a traffic management system in place.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.