Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

IOSH Forums are closing 

The IOSH Forums will close on 5 January 2026 as part of a move to a new, more secure online community platform.

All IOSH members will be invited to join the new platform following the launch of a new member database in the New Year. You can continue to access this website until the closure date. 

For more information, please visit the IOSH website.

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

2 Pages12>
Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 31 March 2008 16:56:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Robert K Lewis Think someone may be trying a scam - have received an email purportedly from the HSE concerning a new central point for F10s and a new form. Wording seems odd but the Header of the email suggests no IP address changes - any offers on this - no news on HSE website Bob
Admin  
#2 Posted : 31 March 2008 17:40:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jean Hi Robert While I don't know the answer to your queary, can I suggest that you ring the HSE and get the response from the horse's mouth. That way you could feedback to the rest of us who don't know the answer either. Jean
Admin  
#3 Posted : 31 March 2008 18:43:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Gerry Marchant Rob There is an electronic F10 available here but you cannot type onto it https://www.hse.gov.uk/forms/notification/f10.pdf as previous check with you local office Gerry
Admin  
#4 Posted : 31 March 2008 20:06:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By CFT Can you let us know please Bob? CFT
Admin  
#5 Posted : 01 April 2008 06:37:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Dav This may be a scam. I get calls from site managers and project managers every few months who have had this sort of thing through, asking me what they should do. It usually goes something along the lines of: Someone rings up claiming to be the HSE, and asks for the names and contact details of all the management staff on site as they have some important safety alerts to send out to them. Then if you say ill check and ring you back the number is not recognised. They are only interested in getting the details straight away. I spoke to the HSE the first time this happened and they informed me that they would never ask for for information like this and that everything would be available through their website. The HSE said that it was likely that it was a recruitment company trying an underhand method of getting hold of peoples details in order to poach them. I have never had the F10 thing before, but the F10 will detail the project duration, providing a recruitment company with useful information as to when staff may be available. I would still say ring to check though as the HSE are always keen to know of these scams.
Admin  
#6 Posted : 01 April 2008 07:10:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Gerry Marchant Dav the recruitment one is what occured to us last year....didn't twig until I got a call from two of our site managers claiming they had been called from an agency, didn't give name but it was within hours of me giving this 'HSE caller' site details Gerry
Admin  
#7 Posted : 01 April 2008 08:21:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By MAK Hey Bob, if there isnt anything on the HSE website then its most likely a scam. Incidentally emails like the one you write about are why I do not allow my email address to be shown on this forum.
Admin  
#8 Posted : 01 April 2008 08:24:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By MAK oh and one more thing, if you call infoline with a query that they cannot answer, then the next question invariably is, where is the area your call relates to? This so that they can then refer you the HSE office in that area. So would they make more admin work for themselves by making one central point for F10's which might be required to be sent out to another office?
Admin  
#9 Posted : 01 April 2008 08:32:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Robert K Lewis This was the answer from Paul Tams at HSE who sent out the original email purportedly Yes it is a genuine email and not an April Fools joke. The new form F10 should be available on the web site from tomorrow and it is in preparation for the notification process going entirely electronic in early June 2008. Any old style forms received at this office will be converted onto the new system for the time being, but obviously the more new style forms we get will assist us greatly. Hopefully you will post the new style forms onto the address previously supplied from 7/4/08 and cut us out all together. HSE are not publicising the initial phase, but there will be a big campaign regarding the new electronic system to be used, from May 2008. Paul The email header and IP addie check out but I have responded asking for further confirmation from his Principal today. I ccd to Stephen Williams. I also asked why their website was not being used to inform people. Makes you wonder if they are about ot change CDM07 as this permits one to use any form provided the information is all contained on it. Rubbish publicity at the very least. Bob
Admin  
#10 Posted : 01 April 2008 08:43:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Robert K Lewis Further update Paul Tams has responded to my email and has copied my request to Nic Rigby, Eleri James and others. We await verification that this is not a scam. Headers still match. Bob
Admin  
#11 Posted : 01 April 2008 14:04:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Robert K Lewis Here is the link that has been sent https://www.hse.gov.uk/forms/notification/f10.pdf. It is horrendus, 6 pages long, requiring information over and above the regulatory requirements, is not signed by the client and has to be handwritten. If this is an HSE April Fool joke then it is now time to string some turkeys for Christmas. Even the preparation of the form must have cost a fortune!!! Bob
Admin  
#12 Posted : 01 April 2008 14:59:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Brett Day I did notice this on the previous page: https://www.hse.gov.uk/forms/notification/ "Further information Please note that the online F10 notification form has been temporarily removed. The version currently available must be printed, completed manually and sent by post to HSE. We apologise for this inconvenience. A new replacement interactive form will shortly be available." So an all electronic form on the way ??
Admin  
#13 Posted : 01 April 2008 15:39:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Edward H No its not a scam or a prank, HSE are apparently implementing the electronic recording of F10s in two stages: The first stage involves the new form that is now on their website [a little bird tells me they have spotted the cock-up about the client signature and are amending overnight]. This form has to be printed, manually completed and posted to the new central unit. Apparently it has been designed so that it can be electronically scan-read into the database. The second stage, due in June, is meant to be a form that can be completed on-line. Given government's track record for IT projects I won't hold my breath...
Admin  
#14 Posted : 01 April 2008 15:52:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Robert K Lewis I have it on their authority that you can continue using the old version if you wish so the objective they desired is defunct. They also claim to have consulted widely on the new form - Anyone admit to it? Bob
Admin  
#15 Posted : 01 April 2008 15:56:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Brett Day Well part of my role is as a CDM-C, I attend the local HSE WWT meetings and this is the first I've heard on this matter.
Admin  
#16 Posted : 01 April 2008 17:40:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Mike I note that mandatory fields are marked with an asterix ???? the Gaul no doubt!
Admin  
#17 Posted : 02 April 2008 08:22:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Robert K Lewis I particularly like the idea that if you have a project involving asbestos, demolition, refurbishment, newbuild you have to do a separate F10 for each as you can only select ONE type of work on each form. Looks like they want projects split down into smaller elements - thus many of these will escape notification as they will fall below thresholds if needed to be notified alone. All in all a good way to increase bureacracy Bob
Admin  
#18 Posted : 02 April 2008 11:54:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Paul Woodard The CDM2007 Regulations list the particulars which need to be notified to the enforcing authority. Therefore if the CDM-C writes what is required on a blank piece of paper and sends this to the enforcing authority then they are compliant with the Regulations. How the HSE decides to process the information from there onwards is entirely up to them. Until legislation tells me to use a particular format I shall carry on using my own.
Admin  
#19 Posted : 02 April 2008 12:16:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Robert K Lewis I feel totally the same Paul. Somewhere along the line the vision of an electronic system and the implementation the HSE policy people seem to have lost the plot. My own organisation has written a formal response copied to Stephen Williams as we feel strongly that there has not been proper consultation over this. Apparently there are 2 or 3 selected organisations piloting the electronic version, if it is based around this hard copy form it will still be very unwieldy. Even the error correction to the signature last night has still not cured the syntactic problems and now makes no sense when read. Unless they have a lot of data entering assistants in Bootle the system will soon clog up. We will continue to use the report form that links to our database for notification. There are elements to make you smile though on page 2/3 of the form - "Not Required" is a type of project, ie we need to notify the non notifiable works - You can have a flat of 0 storey - The note requiring CDM C details to be completed is in section 6 area instead of section 7 I somehow doubt that we can make any difference unless organisations express their concerns. The idea of the electronic form and database is good but it needs to be done by people with knowledge of how construction works. The APS were apparently involved as consultees, not IOSH Constr. SG though, and I do not understand how the issues currently apparent slipped through the net. Perhaps the all singing and dancing electronic form due at the start of June will be the miracle that this hard copy form is not. Somehow I have my doubts. In the meantime and beyond carry on as you are we are still within the law whatever. Bob
Admin  
#20 Posted : 04 April 2008 16:29:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Robert K Lewis Sorry to resurrect this but Paul Tams under instruction from senior persons at HSE has now emailed persons again concerning the F10. He is claiming that only this new form can be used. This is incorrect and contrary to legislation - Any form can be used providing it contains the relevant information - Do not pay attention to the misinformation in any email received. Eleri James, of HSE, has confirmed my views in writing. Copy available Bob
Admin  
#21 Posted : 04 April 2008 23:26:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jean I bet you're sorry that I suggested obtaining clarification from the horses mouth. Sorry, but I'm not too sure that I'm any the wiser. Jean
Admin  
#22 Posted : 05 April 2008 07:43:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Martyn Hendrie I am sure someone will correct me if I am wrong, I don't have access to the regs to check. I thought there is no legal requirement to use the F10. Only to notify the prescribed information to the HSE. If that is the case how can the HSE enforce an electronic only notification process?
Admin  
#23 Posted : 05 April 2008 17:40:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Robert K Lewis Martyne The very question I asked - reponse was Quote As in war - merely following orders. Unquote Neither APS nor IOSH Constr. SG appear to know anything which suggests a mighty publicity flop and PR disaster looming if Mail or Times pick it up. Bob
Admin  
#24 Posted : 05 April 2008 20:11:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Robert K Lewis Martyn Excuse the Saturday spelling of your name. Jean I have had some private emails on this as well and I think the root of the problem lies in an HSE decision to not publicise this posting of the form onto the internet until the electronic version was ready for June. If they have made a mess of this e-form like the current new version I dread to think of the problems. The claimed consultees do not seem to know what is going on and one says it was a brief answer to a question at one meeting. Whoever prepared this form is not au fait with construction and as i said in an earlier post I look forward to notifying a house of 0 storey which is an offerred option or to tick Not Required as a type of work. Personally we will not be using this form and will continue to use the one produced via our database. We only need to enter the information once and not many times by hand. At up to 100 notifications a month we do need to use time efficiently. Shame that the powers that be at Bootle do not recognise this. This post will be most likely moderated out soon but I hope most do get a chance to read it. Are we in a position to defend organisations that have no sense of the real meaning of consultation and Working Well Together? Bob
Admin  
#25 Posted : 07 April 2008 13:05:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By peter gotch Bob. A flat of 0 storeys could be a road? Regards, Peter
Admin  
#26 Posted : 07 April 2008 13:26:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Robert K Lewis Peter A road is a separate item and needs a separate form for notification - one type of work per form only is permitted. Do not forget that you can also have a house of 0 storey - will this be a street in your reckoning? :-) Still it is good to know such people support WWT and many other campaigns encouraging a team approach to construction. Maybe it is a case of "don't do as we do, do as we say" syndrome. I personally am wonderingh if we will find out who has actually drafted the form and who is driving this forward so hard in spite of concerns which I think are being expressed in many quarters from what I have heard. Bob
Admin  
#27 Posted : 07 April 2008 13:45:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By peter gotch Yes, Bob. The street I live in has a monopitch roof!! P
Admin  
#28 Posted : 07 April 2008 13:49:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Robert K Lewis It must be just a roof otherwise it would have a storey. Bob
Admin  
#29 Posted : 07 April 2008 15:52:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Mitch Bob, Just had this link from HSE in their weekly bulletin. https://www.hse.gov.uk/f...hsegen/07-apr-2008&cr=15
Admin  
#30 Posted : 07 April 2008 16:05:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Robert K Lewis Mitch Been revised again since Friday I see wrt the signature box text. Very little else has changed and my original views still stand. The HSE have lost a lot of my respect over this fiasco. It is a little too late to start responding to comments from those in the industry when you have virtually ignored them up to this point. It still adds many coats of bureaucracy and asks for inane information. Also how do I identify the primary type of work when many of the boxes can apply to one project. Bob
Admin  
#31 Posted : 07 April 2008 16:23:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Mitch Bob, Ignoring this form shouldn't be a problem unless of course it becomes compulsory! The F10 the new stealth bomber!! Mitch
Admin  
#32 Posted : 07 April 2008 16:32:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Robert K Lewis Trouble is that the HSE would like to do that very thing of compulsion without a regulatory change. Bob
Admin  
#33 Posted : 07 April 2008 16:41:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Arran Linton - Smith Is this serious or an April Fool wind-up as this goes against objective of the 2007 CDM regulations which I thought was about reducing bureaucracy? If this is a serious proposal, then Schedule 1 of the CDM Regulations will need to be re-written!
Admin  
#34 Posted : 08 April 2008 07:57:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Mitch This response has been posted on the HSE Construction site with instructions that all notifications (in whatever form) should be sent to Bootle regardless of where the work is to take place. HSE has received a number of queries (posted on this site and at HSE Infoline) regarding the introduction of the new F10 Form. I hope the following clears up any misunderstanding. The position regarding notification of a construction project and signing and displaying the F10 form has not changed since 6 April 2007, when the Construction (Design and Management) Regulations came into force. Notifying a Construction Project and Signing the F10 Form 1) Form F10 encompasses the particulars contained in Schedule 1 to the CDM 2007 Regulations, i.e those to be notified to HSE. The last of these is "A declaration signed by or on behalf of the client that he is aware of his duties under these Regulations." (See also paragraph 6 below.) 2) Ideally, the client (or someone from their organisation) would sign the F10 form. However, the crucial issue is that the client is aware of their duties under the Regulations. Notifiable construction projects require the appointment of a CDM Co-ordinator. Recognising the practicalities involved, and the fact that it is the Co-ordinator's duty to give the client suitable and sufficient advice and assistance to enable them to help them comply with their CDM 2007 duties, the Regulations actually place the notification duty on the CDM Co-ordinator. 3) It follows that in many instances the CDM Co-ordinator will be the person who signs the F10 form on behalf of the client. It is important to be aware, however, that regardless of who signs the F10 form, the client retains their CDM 2007 duties. 4) Any CDM Co-ordinator appointed for a particular project or projects should be competent to discharge their particular duties under CDM 2007. Their particulars will be given on the F10 notification, and it is their legal duty to notify HSE of the project and to make the client aware of their duties. 5) There is no CDM 2007 requirement for a separate letter of authorisation relating to completion of the F10 form (and, in HSE's view, this would fly in the face of one of the underlying principles of CDM 2007, i.e. the reduction of unnecessary bureaucracy). 6) HSE is planning to introduce an interactive electronic F10 form in June 2008. In the meantime, a downloadable F10 form is available on the HSE website at: https://www.hse.gov.uk/forms/notification/f10.pdf. Two declarations are provided on this form, i.e. one to be signed by the client if he/she completes the F10 form; and the other to be signed by the CDM co-ordinator if he/she completes the form. Each declaration is marked with an asterisk, and Box 15 on the form clearly states "(*delete as appropriate). It is not necessary for both the client and the CDM co-ordinator to sign the form. 7) For the time being, old-style F10 forms and the website version can be submitted to HSE, as systems have been put in place for processing both. Displaying the project notification 8) The principal contractor's duty to display the project notification is contained in regulation 22 (k) of the CDM 2007 Regulations. It says: "(k) ensure that the particulars required to be in the notice given under regulation 21 are displayed in a readable condition in a position where they can be read by any worker engaged in the construction work." 9) The ACoP also covers it (page 34, paragaph 150 (q)), where it states that it is the PC's duty to display the project notification. 10) A common-sense approach would be helpful by all concerned i.e. if the F10 is used to notify the project, the simplest thing to do would be to display that at the site - whether it is 2 pages long or 6. If some other means of notification is used, then display that. As stated in the Regulations, it is the required information that needs to be provided or displayed - not any particular form. The F10 is provided as a convenient aid to simplify matters. Once the new interactive electronic F10 form has been introduced (around June 2008), it will produce a suitable copy of the form to be displayed at the construction site.
Admin  
#35 Posted : 08 April 2008 09:28:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Eddie1 Mitch Please could you post a link - can't find this on HSE Web site. Thanks
Admin  
#36 Posted : 08 April 2008 09:51:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Mitch Try this one rocksteady http://webcommunities.hs...showthread?threadid=9614
Admin  
#37 Posted : 08 April 2008 09:53:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Mitch And this one, someone at the HSE has woken up! http://webcommunities.hs...showthread?threadid=9646
Admin  
#38 Posted : 08 April 2008 10:42:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Robert K Lewis Still the implication then that reg 21 and schedule 1 will be changed. All forms even old style F10 can be used LEGALLY and there is nothing the HSE can do to change this without regulatory change. I still think as I have said - Badly worded, badly constructed form without real idea of how construction works Bob
Admin  
#39 Posted : 09 April 2008 08:39:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Robert K Lewis Received an apology from a person in HSE admin today apologising for being over zealous in his emails as it seems he has brought the HSE into disrepute. Seems to me some high ups have been stung and are now creating a scapegoat for their lack of good management over this affair. Bob
Admin  
#40 Posted : 09 April 2008 08:48:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Mitch Politics again, where is the disrepute if it satisfactorily resolves the problems, surely that is what discussion is for?
Users browsing this topic
Guest (2)
2 Pages12>
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.