Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 07 July 2009 10:25:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Admin  
#2 Posted : 07 July 2009 11:18:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Lee R Talk about pot kettle black! At my local fast food chain same as the one named in the article, they have employees waiting at the end window chatting to the employees inside, this giving a high risk of them being hit my vehicles using the drive through. LR
Admin  
#3 Posted : 07 July 2009 14:43:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Nicholas Sutcliffe Seems acceptable, you wouldn't go thorough the drive through on a normal bike so why go thought on a tandem. The chap even states 'We just decided to try our luck" that says to me it was just done to entice a reaction, and they didn't even expect to get served.
Admin  
#4 Posted : 07 July 2009 14:49:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Peter Still Just how does one ride a bike with a burger in one hand and a large Coke in the other? Even without the fries, there's a hazardous situation there!
Admin  
#5 Posted : 07 July 2009 14:59:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Peter Zunda Yes, could drop the burger, perish the thought!
Admin  
#6 Posted : 07 July 2009 15:51:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Paul Leadbetter Just you wait, there'll be an epidemic of 'no bikes' signs going up some time soon! Paul
Admin  
#7 Posted : 07 July 2009 19:06:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Crim I'm with Macdonalds on this one. How about a mum with a baby in a push chair going through, I suppose some of you would say she should be served?
Admin  
#8 Posted : 09 July 2009 07:23:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By justgossip I would consider that mcdonalds took the wrong action and it would have been OK to let them through. For me its just another example of H&S in lala land. garry
Admin  
#9 Posted : 09 July 2009 17:23:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Graham Bullough I know it’s not Friday today but I can’t resist a frivolous comment about the hypothetical mum mentioned by Crim: In veterinary and farming parlance, it would seem that she had already been “served” – some 9 months before her bairn was born! Hope this observation doesn’t overstep the threshold setting of any moderatorial smutometer. If so, I would advise that years ago the BBC would have regularly triggered smutometers with its TV comedy series “Are you being served”. Each episode was packed with double entendres, never mind the title one. Awareness of the series seems to have been revived by the recent death of actress Mollie Sugden who achieved fame as its formidable Mrs Slocombe.
Admin  
#10 Posted : 09 July 2009 18:41:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Adrian Woon With regard to the TV comedy series "Are you being served", I have the abiding memory of the phrase "I'm free" - he he!
Admin  
#11 Posted : 09 July 2009 18:42:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Mark Johnson This has more to do with insurance and liability than health and safety. Health and safety is always used as an excuse why things can't be done.
Admin  
#12 Posted : 10 July 2009 09:38:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Nicholas Sutcliffe its not called a walk through, nor is it called a pedal through, i think there is a hint of how to use it in the name "DRIVE through" Case Closed
Admin  
#13 Posted : 10 July 2009 09:40:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Paul Leadbetter But, surely, one drives a bike just as much as one drives a car? Paul
Admin  
#14 Posted : 10 July 2009 10:42:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Nicholas Sutcliffe Drive a bike???? personally i ride a bike. what is this, pedantic Friday?
Admin  
#15 Posted : 10 July 2009 11:09:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Swis most of the time it's; 'DRIVE THRU'
Admin  
#16 Posted : 10 July 2009 12:52:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Kevin Brown Just motorists, golfers and mauls then ...
Admin  
#17 Posted : 10 July 2009 13:01:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Ron Hunter That's one confused Restaurant Manager! 'It's a general health and safety policy in case they are hit by cars.' 'To be honest if I'd have been working that shift I would have probably served them but advised them it was at their own risk. 'After 11pm, we only open the drive-thru and in my opinion if somebody wants to be served at the window they do so at their own risk. Common sense should prevail.' H&S Policy, discretion, 'own risk' and common sense prevailing - all neatly wrapped into one argument! Sounds like a job for the RSES to sort out!
Users browsing this topic
Guest (2)
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.