Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 08 September 2009 15:17:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By jeffrey david smith Looking for some clarification as I think I am loosing my mind... I was recently informed that there may be changes to the types and numbering of the surveys. Has anyone else heard about this and does anyone actually know what it is about?
Admin  
#2 Posted : 08 September 2009 15:29:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Bob Howden Recent information on the HSE website gives two types of survey - a Management Survey and a Refurbishment/Demolition Survey.
Admin  
#3 Posted : 08 September 2009 15:43:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By jeffrey david smith thanks for that although I was thinking more along the lines of types 1 thru' 3. Any ideas?
Admin  
#4 Posted : 08 September 2009 15:44:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Phil Rose My understanding is that MDHS100 will be replaced with a guidance note and that the current type 1,2 etc will be replaced with a narrative and more understandable description of the survey type as above.
Admin  
#5 Posted : 08 September 2009 16:47:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Robert K Lewis The refurbishment/demolition survey gives me some concerns as there seems to be no limit on the scale of refurbishment and the draft text worked on a presumption that the ACMs will be removed. I applaud the idea of a narrative description though in order to remove any doubt in the minds of developers that an intrusive survey is needed before demolition. This is as opposed to a type 2 and expecting the contractor to look out for suspect materials which seems to be the attitude of many. Bob
Admin  
#6 Posted : 08 September 2009 16:53:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Doug Kelly There is 'soon' to be published a guidance note along the lines of HSG248 The analyst's guide and HSG247 The licensed contractors guide, to be named 'The survey guide' or similar. This will replace MDHS100 as previously posted. I understand the intention is to clarify asbestos-survey requirements based on experience of operating under the existing guidance. Hopefully the new guidance will not mean having to re-survey - although a re-evaluation of existing arrangements might be in order.
Admin  
#7 Posted : 08 September 2009 18:06:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Richard Hammer No longer will certain surveyors be able to get away with the 'no access so presume asbestos' routine that some always seem to have as bog standard.
Admin  
#8 Posted : 08 September 2009 22:45:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Ron Hunter There has been some talk of alpha-numeric classification of Survey type (2a, 3b etc) however I fear we really will have to wait until the revised documents are published to see what system is proposed.
Admin  
#9 Posted : 09 September 2009 08:15:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By gerry d I attended a roadshow organised by the HSE/ BOHS in June relating to the proposed changes. The document is to be called Asbestos: The Surveyors Guide and is not yet published as far as I`m aware. Survey types 1, 2 & 3 are to be replaced by `Management` and `Refurbishment/ Pre-demolition` surveys. Caveats are to be discouraged. Surveyors must refrain from using presumptive assessments unless there is strong evidence as to why this in necessary. The responsibility lies with both the surveyor and their client to avoid things like `no access` or `inaccessible`. The theory is to ensure all ACMs are accounted for in any given building. In reality, there will still be instances where ACMs cannot be easily reached or detected especially during `management` surveys. What the HSE are trying to do is reduce this to the lowest level possible as currently it is an easy default when conducting surveys. I agree with the comment that it may be difficult to establish when a refurbishment/ pre-dem survey is applicable. Perhaps the final publication may clarify this. I presume the comment referring to `re-survey` means `re-inspection`. There is no change to this requirement. ACMs must still be managed on an ongoing basis. Gerry
Admin  
#10 Posted : 09 September 2009 08:45:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Robert K Lewis What is certain is that costs will rise! We do need better guidance than the MDHS 100 though and one can only hope that clients will come to understand the Management Plan needs of CAR2006 better once the guidance is available. Bob
Admin  
#11 Posted : 10 September 2009 13:10:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By jeffrey david smith thanks all for your replies. Just glad to know that I wasn't going nuts. Keep up the good work Jeff
Users browsing this topic
Guest (2)
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.