Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 14 September 2009 10:04:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By lewes We own and operate two managed office complex’s and have a query with regards to the provision and the responsibility of fire marshals and the frequency of audible alarm testing. The two offices are managed by us although we don’t occupy the buildings and are rarely on site. Both of these buildings have multi-occupancy with numerous low-risk office based tenants. FIRE MARSHALS. As we don’t occupy the building who should be responsible for the provision of fire Marshals? Are we just responsible for the communal areas? AUDIBLE ALARM TESTING. What is the recommended frequency of audible fire alarm testing and who should be undertaking this, as again we are hardly ever on site? Should we be looking for a tenant to take control or to out source the task? Any thoughts??
Admin  
#2 Posted : 14 September 2009 11:02:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Stuff4blokes I have a client who owns several commercial property complexes, some offices, some retail and offices, some industrial. They manage some of these directly, others via managing agents. Fire arrangements are different in each. Some have tenants who have taken on the responsibility, some are the responsibility of th emanaging agents, others have a contracted "building manager" who performs this function and one has nobody but I'm working on that! Each tenant has the responsibility for their own unit and for safe and full evacuation on activation of the alarm. The fire drills are done at 6-monthly intervals and critiqued. Generally this should be specified at the letting stage and when the lease is drafted and part of the fire risk assessment must have dealt with this aspect. If not, then the most operable solution must be found. This is likely to be your responsibility as managers of the building. What does your management fee provide for the tenants?
Admin  
#3 Posted : 14 September 2009 11:43:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Coshh Assessor Are there any fire risk assessments for the offices?
Admin  
#4 Posted : 14 September 2009 11:46:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By lewes Thanks you both for your input. We are in the process of putting the fire RA together, hence my questions
Admin  
#5 Posted : 14 September 2009 12:05:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Coshh Assessor Fair enough! Evacuation arrangements surely need to be the responsibility of the tenants - as well as having their own evacuation procedure (which may or may not include marshals), they will need to test it in drills. Audible tests are normally done weekly. They are usually very quick and simple to do and involve operating one of the call-points in rotation (using a key to set it off, and contacting any monitoring centre beforehand to tell them it is a test). It would make sense for the tenants to do the testing. Of course they need the instructions for how to do it.
Admin  
#6 Posted : 14 September 2009 17:42:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By FAH Hi Lewes In answer to your specific questions & supporting information:- 1 - As the premises controller you are responsible for ensuring that FRAs have been completed for ALL common areas & that suitable emrgency procedures are imposed. 2 - As premises controller you are responsible for making sure that all the tenants have completed their FRAs AND that ALL their emergency response procedures are fully & properly integrated with yours [for the common areas] & each others. 3 - The provision of Fire Marshals is contentious under these circumstances. However, given that you have no controlling presence on site, it may be appropriate to oversee the tenant FRAs & ensure that each tenant provides some reliable means of providing information to the oncoming Emergency Services. 4 - The provision of an alarm system to cater for the common areas & to warn those elswhere in the building in the event of a fire is your responsibility. It is also your responsibility to ensure that the provided alarm system is suitably tested & maintained. One acceptable way of achieving the testing could be by "persuading" an influential tenant to undertake the testing; but the responsibility for it actually happening will remain yours! As part of the FRA, you should be considering what needs to be tested, how & what frequency. Frank Hallett
Admin  
#7 Posted : 14 September 2009 19:09:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Adrian Watson Regarding 2 above "2 - As premises controller you are responsible for making sure that all the tenants have completed their FRAs AND that ALL their emergency response procedures are fully & properly integrated with yours [for the common areas] & each others." you are not responsible for managing the tenants; you do have a duty to pass information and to co-ordinate actions. Regards
Admin  
#8 Posted : 14 September 2009 19:25:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Joe McCluskey I think you would be responsible to ensure adequate arrangements are made. (I'm sure I will be corrected if I'm wrong lol, but I believe the individual offices would be responsible for their internal procedures, however these would need to tie in with the landlords arrangements ( you being the landlord) I also believe you have the responsibility to manage the arrangements, but the costs associated would be part of the rental agreement. With such high amount of tenancy in one place, it would be normal to have concierge services on site and these guys would be trained to aid escape etc ( fire warden/marshal) Check out the The Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order 2005 the Fire (Scotland) Act 2005 and The Fire Safety (Scotland) Regulations 2006 (England is slightly different to us up here, however the end result would be the same.) THe regs can be downloaded from OPSI Hope this helps JOe
Admin  
#9 Posted : 14 September 2009 19:51:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Adrian Watson Joe, On what basis does the managing agent need to ensure that the tenants make adequate arrangements? Regards Adrian
Admin  
#10 Posted : 14 September 2009 20:19:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By FAH Hi Adrian I generally find that I agree with your posts. Unfortunately, on this occassion I find that I can't 'cos I have a different interpretation of the responsibilities of those who own, & manage on the owners behalf, to the one that you appear to have. In this case it appears that they are the same legal entity anyway. Let's both go back to research the actual wording of the legislation before we come back and dispute this further? Lewes, could you please clarify in which legal administrative area your premises actually are - Scotland, Wales, NI, England or somewhere else? Frank Hallett
Admin  
#11 Posted : 14 September 2009 21:38:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Joe McCluskey Adrian, Basic really I believe in such circumstances the Landlord has a duty of care towards all tenants, therefore he would have a duty to confirm that all tenants have adequate arrangements in place to ensure no tenant is placed at risk by another. Joe
Admin  
#12 Posted : 15 September 2009 07:01:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Adrian Watson Hi Frank/Joe, There is no dispute as to whether the managing agent has responsibilities; he has to carry out a risk assessment of the non-tenanted areas, etc, as well as provide information and coordinate activities with other persons. The point I differ on is as to whether he has responsibility for the tenants. He has responsibility for the tenants to the extent that he has control; no control - no responsibility; full control - full responsibility. If the tenants are an employer, then as employer they have responsibility for ensuring the safety of their staff. The landlord or agent may have responsibility for the structure in the tenants demise if there is not a full repair and maintenance lease in place. As employer the tenant has to appoint fire marshalls, carry out training, etc as well as provide information and coordinate activities with other persons including the landlords or its agent. In no case does the landlord or the agent have to ensure that the tenant complies with the law; that is the role of the enforcer. Regards Adrian
Admin  
#13 Posted : 15 September 2009 07:45:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By FAH Having read your latest post Adrian I believe that we're probably in agreement. I was mislead by the way in which your original observation was made - unfortunately. One last observation, to reinforce a point made in an earlier post. The degree of control to be exercised by the owner/agent will be related to the lease conditions as well as other issues. However, it will be almost impossible under UK law to evade their reponsibilities under the FSO/FSA. Frank Hallett
Admin  
#14 Posted : 15 September 2009 08:25:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By lewes Thanks for all your input, much greater knowledge.
Admin  
#15 Posted : 15 September 2009 08:40:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Adrian Watson Dear All, Apologies for any earlier confusion;I will bew more careful in future. Regards Adrian
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.