pete48 wrote:Oh I don't know Paul, can we be so sure of either point? I have a good friend who currently installs window components and he has an engineering qualification, so he is-although the job doesn't require it.
Have you ever tried calling a maintenance engineer a fitter? It can result in an interference fit I am told. LOL
Enjoyed the rant, good for us all once in a while,
p48
Sorry, I had to have the rant.
Your "friend" ;-)
Has an engineering qualification, I have over a dozen of various sorts.
Does my C&G in PAT testing, no entry qualifications, C&G level, less than a weeks course make me an Engineer?
I don't think so, but my other qualifications do, and they entitle me to put letters after my name and, practice as an engineer in countries where the title is protected in law, just as a medical doctor is in this country.
A globally recognised engineering qualification, to be globally recognised, as an engineer, is at least at first degree level.
We should remember this if we wish to protect our professional recognition.
I'm NOT CMIOSH, and would not pretend to be, I do give H&S advice to customers but within my competence, similar to my posts on here.
I'm no asbestos expert, I have some limited experience, I would not give advice on a petrochem COMAH hazard as I have no real measurable competence, I may comment on areas where my competence can be paralleled though for “debate”.
Sorry peeps!
Please respect other professions.
BTW, I have worked as a maintenance engineer in the past, and most of those I worked with were not engineers, nor was I at the time!
A maintenance engineer may actually be a fitter or an electrician, but probably in all honesty NOT an engineer especially in the UK.
Sorry.
Rant over for now! :-))
Paul